Prediction of Subjective Response from Objective Measurements Applied to Walking Sound

Acta Acustica (Stuttgart)

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 161-170

  Johansson, Ann Charlotte ^a   Hammer, Per ^a   Nilsson, Erling ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOUND INSULATING MATERIALS; SOUND INSULATION; VENEERS;

PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND QUALITY; WALKING SOUNDS;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

EID: 1242352946     PISSN: 16101928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. U. Jekosch, J. Blauert: A semiotic approach toward product sound quality. Inter-Noise 96, GB-Liverpool, 1996, 2283-2286.
2. H. Fastl: The psychoacoustics of sound-quality evaluation. Acustica/acta acustica 83 (1997) 754-764.
3. H. Fletcher, W. A. Munson: Loudness, its definition, calculation and measurement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5 (1933) 82-108.
4. ISO 532: Method for calculating loudness level. 1975.
5. S. Stevens: The measurement of loudness. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 27 (1955) 815-829.
6. S. Stevens: Calculation of loudness of complex noise. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 28 (1956) 807-832.
7. S. Stevens: Procedure for calculating loudness: Mark VI. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 33 (1961) 1577-1585.
8. E. Zwicker: Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (frequenzgruppen). J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 33 (1961) 248.
9. E. Zwicker: A model of loudness summation. Psychological Review 72 (1965) 3-26.
10. DIN 45631: Procedure for calculating loundness level and loudness. 1991.
11. E. Zwicker: Procedure for calculationg loudness of temporally variable sounds. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 62 (1977) 675-682.
12. E. Zwicker: What is a meaningful value for quantifying noise reduction? Inter-Noise 85, Munich, 1985, 47-56.
13. E. Zwicker: Meaningful noise measurement and effective noise reduction. Noise Control Engineering Journal 29 (1987) 66-76.
14. ASAZ24.3: American tentative standards for sound level meters for measurement of noise and other sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 8 (1936) 147-152.
15. E. Zwicker, W. Daxer: A portable loudness meter based on psychoacoustical models. Inter-Noise 81, Amsterdam, 1981, 869-872.
16. L. L. Beranek, J. L. Marshall, A. L. Cudworth, A. P. G. Peterson: Calculation and measurement of the loudness of sounds. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 23 (1951) 261-269.
17. ISO 717: Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements. 1996.
18. K. Bodlund: Alternative reference curves for evaluation of the impact sound insulation between dwellings. Journal of Sound and Vibration 102(3) (1985) 384-402.
19. W. Fasold: Untersuchungen über den Verlauf der Sollkurve für den Trittschallschutz im Wohnungsbau. ACUSTICA 15 (1965) 271-284.
20. E. Zwicker, H. Fastl: Examples for the use of loudness: Transmission loss and addition of noise sources. Inter-Noise 86, Cambidge, Massachusetts, 1986, 861-866.
21. E. Nilsson, P. Hammer: Subjective evaluation of impact sound transmission through floor structures. Tech. Rept. TVBA-3103, Engineering Acoustics, Lund University, 1999.
22. J. Y. Jeon: Subjective evaluation of floor impact noise based on the model of ACF/IACF. Journal of Sound and Vibration 241 (2001) 147-155.
23. Y. Ando: A theory of primary sensations and spatial sensations measuring environmental noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration 241 (2001) 3-18.
24. J. Y. Jeon, J. H. Jeong, Y. Ando: Objective and subjective evaluation of floor impact noise. Journal of Temporal Design in Architecture and the Environment 2 (2002) 20-28.
25. E. Zwicker: A proposal for defining and calculating the unbiased annoyance. Contributions to Psychological Acoustics, A. Schick et al. (eds.) Bibliotheks- und Information-ssystem der Universit t Oldenburg, p. 187-202, 1991.
26. S. K. Tang: Performance of noise indices in air-conditioned landscaped office buildings. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 102 (1997) 1657-1663.
27. U. Ayr, E. Cirillo, I. Fator, F. Martellotta: A new approach to assessing the performance of noise indices in buildings. Applied Acoustics 64 (2003) 129-145.
28. O. Brandt: Akustisk planering, In Swedish. Stockholm, 1958.
29. A.-C. Johansson, E. Nilsson, P. Hammer: Footstep sound from different floor coverings, subjective measurements. Acoustics 2000, Volume 22, GB-Liverpool, 2000, 95-100.
30. A.-C. Johansson, P. Hammer, E. Nilsson: Aspects on three methods for paired comparison listening tests. ICA 01, Rome, 2001, 2 pages.
31. N. Gridgeman: Pair comparison, with and without ties. Biometrics 15 (1959) 382-388.
32. P. V. Rao, L. L. Kupper: Ties in paired comparison experiments: A generalization of the Bradley-Terry model. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 62 (1967) 194-204, Corrigenda 63 1550.
33. R. A. Bradley, M. E. Terry: The rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39 (1952) 324-345.
34. R. A. Bradley: Paired comparisons: Some basic procedures and examples. - In: Handbook of Statistics 4: Nonparametric Methods. P. R. Krishnaiah, P. K. Sen (eds.). Elsevier Science Publishers, 1984, 299-326.
35. A.-C. Johansson, E. Nilsson, P. Hammer: Subjective classification of footstep sound from different floor coverings. Inter-Noise 2000, Volume 5, France, Nice, 2000, 3248-3251.
36. E. Zwicker, H. Fastl: Psychoacoustics, facts and models, 2nd Ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
37. E. Zwicker, U. T. Zwicker: Dependence of binaural loudness summation on interaural level differences, spectral distribution, and temporal distribution. J. Acous. Soc. Amer. 89 (1991) 756-764.
38. G. von Bismarck: Sharpness of steady sounds. ACUSTICA 30 (1974) 159-172.
39. D. C. Montgomery: Design and analysis of experiments, 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
40. U. Widmann: Aurally adequate evaluation of sounds. Proc. Euro Noise 98, 1998, 29-46.
41. H. Fastl: Evaluation and measurement of perceived average loudness. - In: Contributions to Psychological Acoustics. A. S. et al. (ed.). Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universit t Oldenburg, 1991, 205-216.
42. E. Terhardt: Über ein Äquivalenzgesetz für Intervalle akustischer Empfindungsgrößen. Kybernetik 5 (1968) 127-133.