Effect of pressure on dynamic heterogeneity in dendrimeric alkyd resin

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 2020-2025

  Paluch, M ^a,b   Sekula, M ^a   Maslanka S ^a   Manczyk K ^a   Sulkowski W W ^a   Rzoska, S J ^a   Ziolo, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROADBAND NETWORKS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COPOLYMERS; CROSSLINKING; CURVE FITTING; DENDRIMERS; DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES; GLASS TRANSITION; ISOTHERMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRESSURE EFFECTS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; THERMAL EFFECTS;

DENDRIMIC ALKYD RESINS; DIELECTRIC RESPOSE;

RESINS;

EID: 1242332005     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1636696     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. It is worthy of remark that only by neutron spin echo the atomic correlation can be directly observed in the time domain, and the nonexponential (non-Debye) behavior of the dynamics can be established at a microscopic level. See, e.g., R. Zorn, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R1025 (2003).
2. M. D. Ediger, C. A. Angell, and S. R. Nagel, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13200 (1996).
3. K. L. Ngai, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 275, 5 (2003).
4. It should be noted the there still is some controversy whether the nonexponential relaxation is intrinsically stretched or merely a consequence of a distribution of Debye-type processes. See, e.g., W. Doster, F. Post, and M. Settles, in Disordered Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994); A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, M. Monkenbush, and D. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 590 (1998); F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 88, 195 (1992); R. V. Chamberlin, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15638 (1993); R. Richert, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6323 (1997).
5. It should be noted the there still is some controversy whether the nonexponential relaxation is intrinsically stretched or merely a consequence of a distribution of Debye-type processes. See, e.g., W. Doster, F. Post, and M. Settles, in Disordered Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994); A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, M. Monkenbush, and D. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 590 (1998); F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 88, 195 (1992); R. V. Chamberlin, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15638 (1993); R. Richert, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6323 (1997).
6. It should be noted the there still is some controversy whether the nonexponential relaxation is intrinsically stretched or merely a consequence of a distribution of Debye-type processes. See, e.g., W. Doster, F. Post, and M. Settles, in Disordered Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994); A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, M. Monkenbush, and D. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 590 (1998); F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 88, 195 (1992); R. V. Chamberlin, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15638 (1993); R. Richert, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6323 (1997).
7. It should be noted the there still is some controversy whether the nonexponential relaxation is intrinsically stretched or merely a consequence of a distribution of Debye-type processes. See, e.g., W. Doster, F. Post, and M. Settles, in Disordered Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994); A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, M. Monkenbush, and D. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 590 (1998); F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 88, 195 (1992); R. V. Chamberlin, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15638 (1993); R. Richert, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6323 (1997).
8. It should be noted the there still is some controversy whether the nonexponential relaxation is intrinsically stretched or merely a consequence of a distribution of Debye-type processes. See, e.g., W. Doster, F. Post, and M. Settles, in Disordered Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994); A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, M. Monkenbush, and D. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 590 (1998); F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 88, 195 (1992); R. V. Chamberlin, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15638 (1993); R. Richert, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 6323 (1997).
9. K. L. Ngai, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 1107 (2003).
10. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992).
11. T. Pakula, J. Mol. Liq. 86, 109 (2000).
12. R. Böhmer, K. L. Ngai, C. A. Angell, and D. J. Plazek, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4201 (1993).
13. M. Paluch, S. Hensel-Bielowka, and J. Ziolo, Phys. Rev. E 61, 526 (2000).
14. M. Paluch, K. L. Ngai, and S. Henel-Bielowka, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10872 (2001).
15. M. Paluch, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10029 (2001).
16. C. M. Roland, R. Casalini, and M. Paluch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 367, 259 (2003).
17. M. Paluch, S. Pawlus, and C. M. Roland, Macromolecules 35, 7338 (2002).
18. R. Casalini, M. Paluch, J. J. Fontanella, and C. M. Roland, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 4901 (2002).
19. A. Patkowski, M. Paluch, and H. Kriegs, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 2192 (2002).
20. C. G. Robertson, C. M. Roland, C. Paulo, and J. E. Puskas, J. Rheol. 45, 759 (2001).
21. C. G. Robertson, C. M. Roland, and J. E. Puskas, J. Rheol. 46, 307 (2002).
22. P. Janik, M. Paluch, J. Ziolo, W. Sulkowski, and L. Nikiel, Phys. Rev. E 64, 042502 (2001).
23. G. Fludas, G. Fytas, T. Reisinger, and G. Wegner, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 9129 (1999).
24. A. Alegria, D. Gomez, and J. Colmonero, Macromolecules 35, 2030 (2002).
25. K. Mańczyk and P. Szewczyk, Prog. Org. Coat. 44, 99 (2002).
26. H. J. Hobson and W. J. Feast, Polymer 40, 1279 (1999).
27. A. Burgath, A. Sunoler, and H. Frey, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 201, 782 (2000).
28. H. Vogel, Phys. Z. 22, 645 (1921).
29. G. Tammann and W. Hesse, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 156, 245 (1926).
30. G. Williams and D. C. Watts, Trans. Faraday Soc. 66, 80 (1970).