On the throughput analysis of rate-based and window-based congestion control schemes

Computer Networks

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 701-711

  Akan, Özgür B ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

AIMD; Multimedia transport; Rate control protocols; Rate based congestion control

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

ADDITIVE-INCREASE MULTIPLICATIVE-DECREASE (AIMD); MULTIMEDIA TRANSPORT; RATE CONTROL PROTOCOLS; RATE-BASED CONGESTION CONTROL;

CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION);

EID: 1242321279     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2003.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Akan O.B., Fang J., Akyildiz I.F. Performance of TCP protocols in deep space communication networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 6(11):2002;478-480.
2. Akyildiz I.F., Morabito G., Palazzo S. Research issues for transport protocols in satellite IP networks. IEEE Personal Communications. 8(3):2001;44-48.
3. M. Allman, V. Paxson, W. Stevens, TCP Congestion Control, RFC 2581, April 1999.
4. H. Balakrishnan, H.S. Rahul, S. Seshan, An integrated congestion management architecture for Internet hosts, in: Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 1999, September 1999, pp. 175-187.
5. S. Cen, C. Pu, J. Walpole, Flow and congestion control for Internet media streaming applications, in: Proceedings of SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking, January 1998, pp. 250-264.
6. S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, A comparison of equation-based and AIMD congestion control, ACIRI Technical Report, Available 〈http://www.aciri.org/tfrc/aimd.pdf, May 2000〉.
7. Lakshman T.V., Madhow U. The performance of TCP/IP for networks with high bandwidth-delay products and random loss. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking. 5(3):1997;336-350.
8. J.R. Li, S. Ha, V. Bharghavan, HPF: a transport protocol for supporting heterogeneous packet flows in the Internet, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 1999, vol. 3, March 1999, pp. 543-550.
9. D. Logothetis, K.S. Trivedi, A. Puliafito, Markov regenerative models, in: Proceedings of International Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium, Erlangen, Germany, 1995, pp. 134-143.
10. The Network Simulator, ns-2, Available: 〈http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/index.html〉.
11. Padhye J., Firoio V., Towsley D., Kurose J. Modeling TCP Reno performance: a simple model and its empirical validation. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking. 8(2):2000;133-145.
12. Puri R., Lee K.-W., Ramchandran K., Bharghavan V. An integrated source transcoding and congestion control paradigm for video streaming in the internet. IEEE Trans. Multimedia. 3(1):2001;18-32.
13. R. Rejaie, M. Handley, D. Estrin, RAP: an end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the Internet, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 1999, March 1999, vol. 3, pp. 1337-1345.
14. J. Tang, G. Morabito, I.F. Akyildiz, M. Johnson, RCS: a rate control scheme for real-time traffic in networks with high bandwidth-delay products and high bit error rates, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, vol. 1, April 2001, pp. 114-122.
15. D.T. Tran, F.J. Lawas-Grodek, R.P. Dimond, W.D. Ivancic, SCPS-TP, TCP and rate-based protocol evaluation for high-delay, error-prone links, in: SpaceOps 2002, Houston, TX, October 2002.
16. Y.R. Yang, S.S. Lam, General AIMD congestion control, in: Proceedings of IEEE ICNP 2000, Osaka, Japan, November 2000, pp. 187-198.