Function of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Robotic Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 224-229

  Suggs, Jeremy F ^a,b   Li, Guoan ^a,d   Park, Sang Eun ^a   Steffensmeier, Scott ^c   Rubash, Harry E ^a   Freiberg, Andrew A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c ZIMMER INC   (United States)

^d Bioengineering Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanics; Kinematics; Knee; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

AGED; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE LIGAMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 1242319584     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Jamali AA, Rodricks, DJ, Malberg, MI, et al: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasy, p. 1111. In Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, et al (eds): The adult knee. Lippincott, Williams, and Williams, Philadelphia, PA, 2003
2. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop 367:50, 1999
3. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11:782, 1996
4. Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK, et al: The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:692, 1988
5. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ: The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983, 1998
6. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA: Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862, 1998
7. Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, et al: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop 271:96, 1991
8. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, et al: Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop 367:61, 1999
9. Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, et al: Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after "Oxford" medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br811999783
10. Chassin EP, Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, et al: Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:553, 1996
11. Iesaka K, Tsumura H, Sonoda H, et al: The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 35:969, 2002
12. Kennedy WR, White RP: Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop 221:278, 1987
13. Bradley J, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ: A radiographic study of bearing movement in unicompartmental Oxford knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:598, 1987
14. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, et al: In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:1049, 2002
15. Moller JT, Weeth RE, Keller JO: Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of tibial component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 56:115, 1985
16. Moller JT, Weeth RE, Keller JO, et al: Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of the importance of the anterior cruciate ligament. Acta Orthop Scand 56:120, 1985
17. Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES: Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:259, 1980
18. Murrell GA, Maddali S, Horovitz L, et al: The effects of time course after anterior cruciate ligament injury in correlation with meniscal and cartilage loss. Am J Sports Med 29:9, 2001
19. Indelicato PA, Bittar ES: A perspective of lesions associated with ACL insufficiency of the knee. A review of 100 cases. Clin Orthop 198:77, 1985
20. Hsich YF, Draganich LF, Ho SH, et al: The effects ol removal and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on the contact characteristics of the patellofemoral joint. Am J Sports Med 30:121, 2002
21. Harman MK, Markovich GD, Banks SA, et al: Wear patterns on tibial plateaus from varus and valgus osteoarthritic knees. Clin Orthop 352:149, 1998
22. Most E: Development of a 6-DOF robotic test system for studying the biomechanics of total knee replacement [PhD thesis]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2000
23. Li G, Gill TJ, DeFrate LE, et al: Biomechanical consequences of PCL deficiency in the knee Linder simulated muscle loads-an in vitro experimental study. J Orthop Res 20:887, 2002
24. Hoher J, Kanamori A, Zeminski J, et al: The position of the libia during graft fixation affects knee kinematics and graft forces for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 29:771, 2001
25. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J: The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop 276:245, 1992
26. Deschamps G, Lapeyre B: [Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. Apropos of a series of 79 Lotus prostheses with a follow-up of more than 5 years]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73:544, 1987
27. Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Ma CB, et al: The effect of knee flexion angle and application of an anterior tibial load at the time of graft fixation on the biomechanics of a posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 28:460, 2000
28. Allen GR, Wong EK, Livesay GA, et al: Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res 18:109, 2000
29. Sakane M, Livesay GA, Fox RJ, et al: Relative contribution of the ACL, MCL, and bony contact to the anterior stability of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:93, 1999
30. Eastlack ME, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L: Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:210, 1999
31. Alkjaer T, Simonsen EB, Peter Magnusson SP, et al: Differences in the movement pattern of a forward lunge in two types of anterior cruciate ligament deficient patients: copers and non-copers. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:586, 2002