메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 255-261

Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDEMISM; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

EID: 1242310425     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00330.x     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (157)

References (25)
  • 2
    • 0036619726 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Phylogenetic diversity: A quantitative framework for measurement of priority and achievement in biodiversity conservation
    • Barker, G. M. 2002. Phylogenetic diversity: a quantitative framework for measurement of priority and achievement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76:165-194.
    • (2002) Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , vol.76 , pp. 165-194
    • Barker, G.M.1
  • 5
    • 0026499429 scopus 로고
    • Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity
    • Faith, D. P. 1992a. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61:1-10.
    • (1992) Biological Conservation , vol.61 , pp. 1-10
    • Faith, D.P.1
  • 6
    • 38249008767 scopus 로고
    • Systematics and conservation: On predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa
    • Faith, D. P. 1992b. Systematics and conservation: on predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa. Cladistics 8:361-373.
    • (1992) Cladistics , vol.8 , pp. 361-373
    • Faith, D.P.1
  • 8
    • 0002971751 scopus 로고
    • Phylogenetic diversity: A general framework for the prediction of feature diversity
    • P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, and R. I. Vane-Wright, editors. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
    • Faith, D. P. 1994b. Phylogenetic diversity: a general framework for the prediction of feature diversity. Pages 251-268 in P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, and R. I. Vane-Wright, editors. Systematics and conservation evaluation. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    • (1994) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation , pp. 251-268
    • Faith, D.P.1
  • 9
    • 0036185335 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quantifying biodiversity: A phylogenetic perspective
    • Faith, D. P. 2002. Quantifying biodiversity: a phylogenetic perspective. Conservation Biology 16:248-252.
    • (2002) Conservation Biology , vol.16 , pp. 248-252
    • Faith, D.P.1
  • 10
    • 0030429589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? On hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches
    • Faith, D. P., and P. A. Walker. 1996a. How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? On hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches. Biodiversity Letters 3:18-25.
    • (1996) Biodiversity Letters , vol.3 , pp. 18-25
    • Faith, D.P.1    Walker, P.A.2
  • 11
    • 0030460213 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Environmental diversity: On the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas
    • Faith, D. P., and P. A. Walker. 1996b. Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5:399-415.
    • (1996) Biodiversity and Conservation , vol.5 , pp. 399-415
    • Faith, D.P.1    Walker, P.A.2
  • 12
    • 45549113281 scopus 로고
    • Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity
    • Margules, C. R., A. O. Nicholls, and R. L. Pressey. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43:63-76.
    • (1988) Biological Conservation , vol.43 , pp. 63-76
    • Margules, C.R.1    Nicholls, A.O.2    Pressey, R.L.3
  • 13
    • 0031970433 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation
    • Moritz, C., and D. P. Faith. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation. Molecular Ecology 7:419-430.
    • (1998) Molecular Ecology , vol.7 , pp. 419-430
    • Moritz, C.1    Faith, D.P.2
  • 14
    • 0035212505 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria for setting conservation priorities for North American birds
    • Polasky, S., B. Csuti, C. Vossler, and S. M. Meyers. 2001. A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria for setting conservation priorities for North American birds. Biological Conservation 97:99-105.
    • (2001) Biological Conservation , vol.97 , pp. 99-105
    • Polasky, S.1    Csuti, B.2    Vossler, C.3    Meyers, S.M.4
  • 15
    • 0034788822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using phylogenetic diversity measures to set priorities in conservation: An example from southern South America
    • Posadas, P., D. R. Miranda Esquivel, and J. V. Crisci. 2001. Using phylogenetic diversity measures to set priorities in conservation: an example from southern South America. Conservation Biology 15:1325-1334.
    • (2001) Conservation Biology , vol.15 , pp. 1325-1334
    • Posadas, P.1    Miranda Esquivel, D.R.2    Crisci, J.V.3
  • 17
    • 0034628432 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology
    • Radajewski, S., P. Ineson, N. R. Parekh, and J. C. Murrell. 2000. Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology. Nature 403: 646-649.
    • (2000) Nature , vol.403 , pp. 646-649
    • Radajewski, S.1    Ineson, P.2    Parekh, N.R.3    Murrell, J.C.4
  • 18
    • 0036206518 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas
    • Rodrigues, A. S. L., and K. J. Gaston. 2002. Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas. Biological Conservation. 105:103-111.
    • (2002) Biological Conservation , vol.105 , pp. 103-111
    • Rodrigues, A.S.L.1    Gaston, K.J.2
  • 20
    • 0033770858 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea mountains: Implications for conservation
    • Smith, T. B., K. Holder, D. Girman, K. O'Keefe, B. Larison, and Y. Chan, 2000. Comparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea mountains: implications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 10:1505-1516.
    • (2000) Molecular Ecology , vol.10 , pp. 1505-1516
    • Smith, T.B.1    Holder, K.2    Girman, D.3    O'Keefe, K.4    Larison, B.5    Chan, Y.6
  • 23
    • 0028162098 scopus 로고
    • Do conservationists and molecular biologists value differences between organisms in the same way?
    • Williams, P. H., K. J. Gaston, and C.J. Humphries. 1994. Do conservationists and molecular biologists value differences between organisms in the same way? Biodiversity Letters 2:67-78.
    • (1994) Biodiversity Letters , vol.2 , pp. 67-78
    • Williams, P.H.1    Gaston, K.J.2    Humphries, C.J.3
  • 24
    • 0030613347 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bacterial diversity of a Carolina bay as determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis: Confirmation of novel taxa
    • Wise, M. G., J. V. McArthur, and L. J. Shimkets. 1997. Bacterial diversity of a Carolina bay as determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis: confirmation of novel taxa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63:1505-1514.
    • (1997) Applied and Environmental Microbiology , vol.63 , pp. 1505-1514
    • Wise, M.G.1    McArthur, J.V.2    Shimkets, L.J.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.