Correlation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission measures to auditory thresholds

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Balatsouras, Dimitrios G ^a,e   Kaberos, Antonis ^a   Karapantzos, Ilias ^b   Homsioglou, Elias ^c   Economou, Nicolas C ^a   Korres, Stavros ^d  

^a TZANEIO GENERAL HOSPITAL OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

^b DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

^c ENT Clinic   (Greece)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^e NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Auditory threshold; Hearing; Regression analysis; Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOUND INTENSITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 1242308274     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. st ed. San Diego (CA): Singular Publishing Group; 1999. 2-6
2. Kemp DT: Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 1978; 64: 1386-91
3. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P: A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 1990; 11: 92-105
4. Burns EM, Arehart KH, Campbell SL: Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am, 1992; 91: 1571-75
5. McFadden D, Mishra R: On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 1993; 71: 208-13
6. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G: A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 1991; 89: 2027-67
7. Johnsen NJ, Elberling C: Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear: 1. Equipment and response parameters. Scand Audiol, 1988; 11: 3-12
8. Hussain DM, Gorga MP, Neely ST et al: Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 1998; 19: 434-49
9. nd ed. New York: Thieme, 2002, 213-42
10. Bray P, Kemp D: An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol, 1987; 21: 191-204
11. Bonfils P, Piron JP, Uziel A, Pujol R: A correlative study of otoacoustic emission properties and audiometric thresholds. Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1988; 245: 53-56
12. Collet L, Veuillet E, Chanel JM, Morgon A: Evoked otoacoustic emissions: Correlates between spectrum analysis and audiogram. Audiology, 1991; 30: 164-72
13. Prieve BA, Gorga MP, Schmidt A et al: Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 1993; 93: 3308-19
14. Glattke TJ, Pafitis IA, Cummiskey C, Herer GR: Identification of hearing loss in children and young adults using measures of transient otoacoustic emission reproducibility. Am J Áudiol, 1995; 4: 71-86
15. Hurley RM, Musiek FE: Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad Audiol, 1994; 5: 195-203
16. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman B et al: A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 1993; 94: 2639-48
17. Bonfils P, Uziel A: Evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic tumors. Am J Otol, 1988; 9: 412-17
18. Attias J, Furst M, Furman V et al: Noise induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear, 1995; 16: 612-18
19. Prasher D, Sulkowski W: The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 1999; 12: 183-92