Modeling a Ground Water Circulation Well Alternative

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 66-73

  Elmore, Andrew Curtis ^a,b,c   DeAngelis, Luca ^a,b,d,e  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b URS Group Inc   (United States)

^c Nebraska Ordnance Plant Site   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^e University of Kansas ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; FLOW OF WATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REMEDIATION; WATER WELL PUMPS; WATER WELLS;

GROUNDWATER CIRCULATION WELLS (GCW);

GROUNDWATER;

FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTION; REMEDIATION; WELL;

FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REMEDIATION; WELL;

EID: 1242298739     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2004.tb00706.x     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Barrash, W., and M.E. Dougherty. 1997. Modeling axially symmetric and nonsymmetric flow to a well with MODFLOW, and application to Goddard2 well test, Boise, Idaho. Ground Water 35, no. 4: 602-611.
2. Elmore, A.C., and T. Graff. 2002. Best available treatment technologies applied to groundwater circulation wells. Remediation Journal 12, no. 3: 63-80.
3. Elmore, A.C., and T. Graff. 2001. A case study of the beneficial reuse of treated groundwater. Remediation Journal 11, no. 3: 49-62.
4. Elmore, A.C., and J.B. Hellman. 2001. Model-predicted groundwater circulation well performance. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 5, no. 4: 203-210.
5. Fetter C.W. 1994. Applied Hydrogeology, 3rd edition. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
6. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
7. Javandel, I., and C.F. Tsang. 1986. Capture zone type curves: A tool for aquifer cleanup. Ground Water 24, no. 5: 616-625.
8. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. In Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 6, Chapter A1. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.
9. Piskin, R. 1971. Hydrogeology of the University of Nebraska Field Laboratory at Mead, Nebraska. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
10. Pollock, D.W. 1989. Documentation of computer programs to compute and display pathlines using results from the U.S. Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 89-381.
11. Spitz, K., and J. Moreno. 1996. A Practical Guide to Groundwater and Solute Transport Modeling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12. U.S. EPA. 1998. Field applications of in situ remediation technologies: Ground-water circulation wells. EPA 542-R-98-009. Waterloo Hydrogeologic. 2000. Visual MODFLOW. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc.
13. Waterloo Hydrogeologic. 2000. Visual MODFLOW. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc.
14. Zheng, C., and P.P. Wang. 1999. MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; Documentation and user's guide. Contract Report SERDP-99-1, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.