An audit on trends of vaginal delivery after one previous caesarean section

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 135-138

  Singh, T ^a,b   Justin, C W ^a   Haloob, R K ^a  

^a BASILDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MIDWIFE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT INDICATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 1242297659     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610410001645406     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ayromlooi J. and Garfinkel R. (1980) Impact of fetal scalp blood pH on incidence of cesarean section performed for fetal distress. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 17, 391-392.
2. Behague D.P., Victoria C.G. and Barros F.C. (2002) Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice or social inequality? British Medical Journal, 324, 942-945.
3. Cragin E. (1916) Conservatism in obstetrics. New York Medical Journal, civ, 1-5.
4. de Meeus J.B., Ellia F. and Magnin G. (1998) External cephalic version after previous caesarean section: a series of 38 cases. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology, 81, 65-68.
5. Enkin M., Kierse M.J.N.C., Neilson J., Crowther C., Dudley L., Hodnett E. and Jofmeyr J. (2000) A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 3rd edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 359-371.
6. Gamble J.A. and Creedy D.K. (2001) Women's preferences for a caesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth, 28, 101-110.
7. Martins E.M. (1996) Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Clinical Perinatology, 23, 141-153.
8. Myles T. (2001) Vaginal birth of twins after a previous caesarean section. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 10, 171-174.
9. Pai M., Sundaram P., Radhakrishnan K.K., Thomas K. and Muliyil J.P. (1999) A high rate of caesarean sections in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern? National Medical Journal of India, 12, 156-158.
10. Parrish K.M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R., Connell F.A. and LoGerfo J.P. (1994) Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271, 443-447.
11. Pitkin R.M. (1991) Once a cesarean? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 77, 939.
12. Porreco R.P. and Thorp J.A. (1996) The cesarean birth epidemic: trends, causes, and solutions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175, 369-374.
13. Quinlivan J.A., Petersen R.W. and Nichols C.N. (1999) Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 39, 207-214.
14. Sims E.J., Newman R.B. and Hulsey T.C. (2001) Vaginal birth after cesarean, to induce or not to induce. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 184, 1122-1124.