Suitability for psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Validation of the Dynamic Assessment Interview (DAI)

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Volumn 109, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 179-186

  Valbak, K ^a   Rosenbaum, B ^b   Hougaard, E ^c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b GLOSTRUP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Long term; Outcome; Predictors; Psychoanalytic psychotherapy; Suitability; Therapeutic alliance; Working alliance

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT INTERVIEW; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 1242292244     PISSN: 0001690X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0001-690X.2003.00249.x     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. BACHRACH HM, LEAFF LA. 'Analyzability': a systematic review of the clinical and quantitative literature. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1978;26:881-920.
2. BLOCH S. Assessment of patients for psychotherapy. Br J Psychiatry 1979;135:193-208.
3. BINDER JL, HENRY WP, STRUPP HH. An appraisal of selection criteria for dynamic psychotherapies and implications for setting time limits. Psychiatry 1987;50:154-166.
4. MALAN DH. Selection criteria. In: Psychodynamics, training and outcome in brief psychotherapy. London: Butterwoth, 1992:298-303.
5. TILLETT R. Psychotherapy selection and treatment selection. Br J Psychiatry 1996;168:10-15.
6. TRUANT GS. Assessment of suitability for psychotherapy: I. Introduction and the assessment process. Am J Psychother 1998;52:397-410.
7. TRUANT GS. Assessment of suitability for psychotherapy: II. Assessment based on basic process goals. Am J Psychother 1999;53:17-34.
8. SAFRAN JD, SEGAL ZV, VALLIS TM, et al. Assessing patient suitability for short-term cognitive therapy with an interpersonal focus. Cogn Ther Res 1993;17:23-38.
9. WEBER JJ, BACHRACH HM, SOLOMON M. Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis: report of the columbia psychoanalytic center research project (II). Int Rev Psycho-Anal 1985;12:127-141.
10. LUBORSKY L, MINTZ J, AUERBACH A et al. Predicting the outcome of psychotherapy. Findings of the Penn Psychotherapy Project. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:471-481.
11. PIPER WE, JOYCE AS, MCCALLUM M, AZIM HFA. Interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998;66:558-567.
12. HØGLEND P. Suitability for brief dynamic psychotherapy: psychodynamic variables as predictors of outcome. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;88:104-110.
13. ROSENBAUM B, SELZER MA, VALBAK K, HOUGAARD E, SOMMERLUND B. The Dynamic Assessment Interview: testing the psychodynamic assessment variables. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997;95:531-538.
14. SELZER MA, KERNBERG P, FIBEL B, CHERBULIEZ T, MORTATI SG. The personality assessment interview: preliminary report. Psychiatry 1987;50:142-153.
15. BENJAMIN LS. Structural analysis of social behaviour. Psychol Rev 1974;81:392-425.
16. JORGENSEN CR, HOUGAARD E, ROSENBAUM B, VALBAK K, REHFELD E. The Dynamic Assessment Interview (DAI). Interpersonal Process measured by Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour (SASB) and Therapeutic Outcome. Psychother Res 2000;10:181-195.
17. SPITZER RL, WILLIAMS JBW, GIBBON M, FIRST MB. SCID-II Questionnaire enclosed in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorder. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc., 1990.
18. KERNBERG OF. Severe personality disorders. Psychotherapeutic strategies. New York: Yale University Press, 1984.
19. SHROUT PE, FLEISS JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.
20. HORVATH AO, GREENBERG L. Development and Validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Counsel Psychol 1989; 36:223-233.
21. MARMAR CR, GASTON L. Manual of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales (CALPAS). Version 05.12.89. San Francisco, CA: University of California (Mimeo), 1989.
22. DEROGATIS LR. SCL-90-R. Administration, Scoring and Procedures. Manual-II. Clin Psychometr Res 1992.
23. FRANK JD, HOEHN-SARIC R, IMBER SD, LIBERMAN BL, STONE AR. Effective ingredients of successful psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1978.
24. ENDICOTT J, SPITZER RL, FLEISS JL, COHEN J. The Global Assessment Scale. A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33:766-771.
25. MINTZ J, LUBORSKY L, CHRISTOPH P. Measuring outcomes of psychotherapy: findings from the Penn Psychotherapy Project. J Consult Clin Psychol 1979;47:319-334.
26. LUBORSKY L, CRITS-CHRISTOPH P, MINTZ J, AUERBACH A. Who will benefit from psychotherapy? Predicting therapeutic outcomes. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, 1988.
27. VALBAK K. Suitability for psychoanalytic psychotherapy: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;164-178.
28. DEWITT KN, KALTREIDER NB, WEISS DS, HOROWITZ MJ. Judging change in psychotherapy: reliability of clinical ratings. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:1121-1128.
29. VAUGHAN SC, SPITZER R, DAVIES M, ROOSE S. The definitions and assessment of analytic process: can analysts agree? Int J Psycho-Anal 1997;78:959-973.
30. HØGLEND P, SOLIE T, SORBYE O, HEYERDAHL O, AMLO S. Long-term changes after brief dynamic psychotherapy: symptomatic vs. dynamic assessments. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992; 86:165-172.
31. BATES LW, LYONS JA, SHAW JB. Effects of brief training on application of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Psychol Rep 2002;91:999-1006.
32. LOEVDAHL H, FRIIS S. Routine evaluation of mental health: reliable information or worthless 'guesstimates'? Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;92:125-128.
33. ORLINSKY DE, GRAWE K, PARKS BK. Process and outcome in psychotherapy - noch einmal. In: BERGIN AE, GARFIELD SL, eds. Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change. 4th edn. New York: Wiley, 1994:290.
34. MARTIN DJ, GARSKE JP, DAVIS MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables. A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:438-450.
35. HAAGA DAF. Introduction to the special section on stepped care models in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68:547-548.
36. LAMBERT MJ. Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: patient-focused research. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2001;69:147-149.
37. BARTH K, NIELSEN G, HAVIK OE et al. Assessment for three different forms of short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Findings from the Bergen Project. Psychother Psychosom 1988;49:153-159.