Implementing high seas biodiversity conservation: Global geopolitical considerations

Marine Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 221-226

  Kaye, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Geopolitics; High seas; Marine parks

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GEOPOLITICS; INTERNATIONAL LAW; MARINE PARK; NATURE CONSERVATION;

EID: 1242276491     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2003.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kwiakowska B. Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 mile in the light of the 1982 law of the sea convention and state practice Ocean Development and International Law 22 1991 153
2. Oda S. International control of sea resources. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989. p. xxi.
3. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, done at Montego Bay 10 December 1982, entered into force 16 November 1994: Reprinted at 21 ILM 1261.
4. Schreiber HN. Ocean governance and the marine fisheries crisis: Two decades of innovation. Virginia Environmental Law Review 2001;20:119, 126.
5. Balton D.A. The Bering Sea doughnut hole convention: Regional solution global implications Stokke O.S. Governing high seas fisheries-the interplay of global and regional regimes 2001 153 Oxford University Press Oxford
6. Kaye S.B. International fisheries management 2001 Kluwer Law International The Hague
7. Meltzer E. Global overview of straddling, and highly migratory fish stocks: The non-sustainable nature of high seas fisheries. Ocean Development and International Law 1994;25:255, 279-305.
8. Teece D.R. Global overfishing and the Spanish-Canadian turbot war: Can international law protect the high-seas environment? Colorado Journal of International Law and Policy 8 1997 89
9. Christopherson M. Toward a rational harvest: The United Nations agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory species Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 5 1996 357
10. Faith J. Enforcement of fishing regulations in international waters: Piracy or protection: is gunboat diplomacy the only means left? Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law 1996;19:199, 203.
11. Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas, done at Rome on 24 November 1993, entered into force 24 April 2003: Reprinted 33 ILM 968, 1994.
12. Koh TTB, Jayakumar S. The negotiating process of the third United Nations conference on the law of the sea. In: Nordquist MH, editor. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol. 1. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1985. p. 29, 72-5.
13. Galdorisi G. The United States Freedom of Navigation Program: A bridge for international compliance with the 1982 United Nations convention on the law of the sea Ocean Development and International Law 27 1996 399
14. Rolph J.W. Freedom of navigation and the Black Sea bumping incident: How "innocent" must innocent passage be? Military Law Review 135 1992 137
15. See Article 3, MARPOL 73/78, done at London on 17 February 1978, entry into force 2 October 1983: 1492 UNTS 365; Article 7(4), International Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter done at London, Mexico City, Moscow, and Washington on 29 December 1972, entered into force on 30 August 1975: 1046 UNTS 120.
16. McCarthy E.M. International regulation of transboundary pollutants: The emerging challenge of ocean noise Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 6 2000 257
17. Post AM. Deep sea mining and the law of the sea. The Hangue: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983. p. 57-65.
18. Schmidt MG. Common heritage or common burden? The United States position on the development of a regime for deep sea-bed mining in the Law of the Sea Convention. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. p. 142.
19. Lodge MW. The International Seabed Authority's regulations on prospecting and exploration for polymetallic nodules in the area. Internet Journal of the Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy 2001;10.
20. Allen C.H. Protecting the oceanic gardens of Eden: International law issues in deep-sea vent resource conservation and management Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 13 2001 563
21. Knauss J.A. The effects of the law of the sea on future marine scientific research and of marine scientific research on the future law of the sea Louisiana Law Review 45 1985 1201