Editorial comment

Urology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 239-240

  Novick, Andrew C ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; CANCER STAGING; DATA BASE; HUMAN; NEPHRECTOMY; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUBLISHING; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURVIVAL RATE; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 1242274352     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.082     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Bennington J.L. Renal adenoma. World J Urol. 5:1987;66-75.
2. Bosniak M.A., Birnhaum B.A., Krinsky G.A., et al. Small renal parenchymal neoplasms further observations of growth . Radiology. 197:1995;589-597.
3. Guinan P., Saffrin R., Stuhldreher D., et al. Renal cell carcinoma comparison of the TNM and Robson stage groupings . J Surg Onc. 59:1995;186-189.
4. Guinan P., Sobin L., Algaba F., et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 80:1997;992-993.
5. Igarashi T., Tobe T., Nakatsu H., et al. The impact of a 4 cm cut-off point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 165:2001;1103-1106.
6. Zisman A., Pantuck A., Chao D., et al. Re-evaluation of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma T1 and T2 cut-off point at 4.5 rather than 7 cm better correlates with clinical outcome . J Urol. 166:2001;54-58.
7. Cheville J., Blute M., Zincke H., et al. Stage pT1 conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma pathological features associated with cancer specific survival . J Urol. 166:2001;453-456.
8. Hafez K., Fergany A., Novick A.C. Nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging . J Urol. 162:1999;1930-1933.
9. Lerner S., Hawkins C., Blute M., et al. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron-sparing or radical surgery. J Urol. 155:1996;1868-1873.
10. Lee C., Katz J., Shi W., et al. Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol. 163:2000;730-736.