Time-domain Raman measurement of molecular submonolayers by time-resolved reflection spectroscopy

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 108, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1525-1528

  Fujiyoshi, Satoru ^a,b   Ishibashi, Taka Aki ^a,b   Onishi, Hiroshi ^a,b  

^a KANAGAWA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; DYES; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; FUSED SILICA; MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS; RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY; REFLECTION; SPIN COATING; SUBSTRATES; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

CRESYL VIOLET; MOLECULAR SUBMONOLAYERS; TIME RESOLVED REFLECTION SPECTROSCOPY;

MONOLAYERS;

EID: 1242265614     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp037240w     Document Type: Letter

References (21)

1. Ulman, A. An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films from Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1991.
2. Adams, D. M.; Brus, L.; Chidsey, C. E. D.; Creager, S.; Creutz, C.; Kagan, C. R.; Kamat, P. V.; Lieberman, M.; Lindsay, S.; Marcus, R. A.; Metzger, R. M.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E.; Miller, J. R.; Newton, M. D.; Rolison, D. R.; Sankey, O.; Schanze, K. S.; Yardley, J.; Zhu, X. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 6668.
3. Otto, A.; Mrozek, I.; Grabhorn, H.; Akemann, W. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1992, 4, 1143.
4. Campion, A.; Kambhampati, P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 241.
5. Hamaguchi, H. In Advances in Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy; Clark, R. J. H., Hester, R. E., Eds.; Wiley: Heyden, 1985; Vol. 12, p 273.
6. Dhar, L.; Rogers, J. A.; Nelson, K. A. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 157.
7. Cho, M.; Du, M.; Scherer, N. F.; Fleming, G. R.; Mukamel, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 2410.
8. Ziegler, L. D.; Fan, R.; Desrosiers, A. E.; Scherer, N. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 1823.
9. Goodno, G. D.; Miller, R. J. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 10619.
10. Khalil, M.; Demirodöven, N.; Golonzka, O.; Fecko, C. J.; Tokmakoff, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 5711.
11. The temporal behavior of the response of the substrate (Figure 2e) is apparently different from that of the electronic response observed in the time-resolved absorption measurements (Figure 2b). The temporal behavior (Figure 2e) probably reflects the optical interference between the pump and probe pulses. This type of interference appeared when the incident angle of the probe light was close to the surface normal of the substrate.
12. Bloembergen, N.; Pershan, P. S. Phys. Rev. 1962, 128, 606.
13. Iwata, K.; Hamaguchi, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 632.
14. Fujiyoshi, S.; Takeuchi, S.; Tahara, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 494.
15. Anfinrud, P.; Crackel, R. L.; Struve, W. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5873.
16. Walker, G. C.; Jarzeba, W.; Kang, T.; Johnson, A. E.; Barbara, P. F. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1990, 7, 1521.
17. Joo, T.; Jia, Y.; Yu, J.-Y.; Lang, M. J.; Fleming, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 6089.
18. Passino, S. A.; Nagasawa, Y.; Joo, T.; Fleming, G. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 725.
19. Shang, X.; Benderskii, A. V.; Eisenthal, K. B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 11578.
20. Benderskii, A. V.; Eisenthal, K. B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6698.
21. Joo, T.; Albrecht, A. C. Chem. Phys. 1993, 173, 17.