A numerical study on low and higher-order potential based BEM for 2D inviscid flows

Computational Mechanics

Volumn 32, Issue 4-6, 2003, Pages 327-335

  Vaz, G ^a   Falcao de Campos J A C ^a,b   Eca L ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b MARIN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Asymptotic Order of Accuracy; BEM; Higher order methods; Verification methods

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; CAVITATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; KINEMATICS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SHIP PROPELLERS;

ASYMPTOTIC ORDER OF ACCURACY; BEM; HIGHER-ORDER METHODS; VERIFICATION METHODS;

FLOW OF FLUIDS;

EID: 1242265149     PISSN: 01787675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-003-0490-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Batchelor GK (1967) An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press
2. Dang J (2001) Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Partial Cavity Flows, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University
3. Eça L, Hoekstra M (2002) An Evalution of Verification Procedures for CFD Applications. Proceedings of the 24th Symposyum on Naval Ship Hydrodynamics
4. Eça L, Vaz G, Falcão de Campos JAC (2002) Verification Study of Low and Higher-Order Potential Based Panel Methods for 2D Foils. Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, St. Louis Missouri, USA
5. Gans HK (1994) Numerical Time Dependent Sheet Cavitation Simulations using a Higher Order Panel Method, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University
6. Hess JL (1972) Higher order numerical solution of the integral equation for the two-dimensional Neumann problem. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2: 1-15
7. Hess JL (1975) Improved solution for potential flow about arbitrary axisymmetric bodies by the use of a higher order surface source method. Comput. Math. Appl. Mech. Eng. 5: 297-308
8. Hoeijmakers HW (1992) Panel Methods for Aerodynamics Analysis and Design, Tech. Rep. 783, AGARD
9. Katz J, Plotkin A (2001) Low Speed Aerodynamics., Cambridge Aerospace Series, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn.
10. Kinnas SA (1996) Theory and numerical methods for the hydrodynamics analysis of marine propulsors. Advances in Marine Hydrodynamics. Computational Mechanics Publications, pp. 279-322
11. Kinnas SA, Hsin CY (1994) The local error of a low order boundary element method at the trailing edge of a hydrofoil and its effect on the global solution. Comput. Fluids 23(1): 63-75
12. Krishnaswamy P, Andersen P, Kinnas SA (2001) Re-entrant Jet Modelling for Partially Cavitating Two-Dimensional Hydrofoils. Proceedings of Cav2001, Pasadena, California, USA
13. Maskew B (1982) Prediction of subsonic aerodynamic characteristics: A case for low-order panel methods. J. Aircraft 19(2): 157-163
14. Morino L, Bernardini G (2001) Singularities in BIE's for the Laplace Equation: Joukowski Trailing-edge Conjecture Revisited Eng. Ana. Boundary Elements 25: 805-818
15. Morino L, Kuo C (1974) Subsonic potential aerodynamics for complex configurations: A general theory. AIAA J. 12(2): 191-197
16. Roache P (1997) Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annual Review Fluid Mechanics, pp. 123-160
17. Romate JE (1988) Local Error Analysis in 3D Panel Methods. J. of Eng. Math., pp. 123-142
18. Vaz G (2001) A Higher Order Potential Based BEM for Two-Dimensional Flows, Tech. Rep. J584-3, IST/MARETEC