A parallel solution-adaptive scheme for multi-phase core flows in solid propellant rocket motors

International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 159-177

  Sachdev, J S ^a   Groth, C P T ^a   Gottlieb, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive mesh refinement; Multi phase flow; Parallel computing; Solid propellant rocket motors

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT (AMR); GRAIN GEOMETRY; MULTI-PHASE FLOW; SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKET MOTORS (SRM);

DATA STRUCTURES; DECOMPOSITION; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; OSCILLATIONS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); ROCKET ENGINES;

SOLID PROPELLANTS;

EID: 12344335045     PISSN: 10618562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10618560410001729135     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Aftosmis, M.J., Berger, M.J. and Melton, J.E. Robust and efficient Cartesian mesh generation for component-base geometry. AIAA J., 1998, 36(6), 952-960.
2. Alavilli, P., Buckmaster, J., Jackson, T.L. and Short, M. Ignition-transient modeling for solid propellant rocket motors. AIAA Paper, 2000, 00-3567.
3. Barth, T.J. Recent developments in high order k-exact reconstruction on unstructured meshes. AIAA Paper, 1993, 93-0668.
4. Barth, T.J. and Fredrickson, P.O. Higher order solution of the Euler equations on unstructured grids using quadratic reconstruction. AIAA Paper, 1990, 90-0013.
5. Bayyuk, S.A., Powell, K.G. and van Leer, B. A simulation technique for 2-D unsteady inviscid flows around arbitrarily moving and deforming bodies of arbitrary geometry. AIAA Paper, 1993, 93-3391.
6. Berger, M.J. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. PhD thesis, 1982, Stanford University.
7. Berger, M.J. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys., 1984, 53, 484-512.
8. Berger, M.J. and Colella, P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys., 1989a, 82, 67-84.
9. Berger, M.J. and LeVeque, R.J. An adaptive Cartesian mesh algorithm for the Euler equations in arbitrary geometries. AIAA Paper, 1989b, 89-1930.
10. Berger, M.J. and Saltzman, J.S. AMR on the CM-2. Appl. Numer. Math., 1994, 14, 239-253.
11. Bramkamp, F., Ballmann, J. and Müller, S. Development of a flow solver employing local adaptation based on multiscale analysis on b-spline grids. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Montreal, Canada, June 11-13, 2000, 1, pp. 111 -118, 2000 (CFD Society of Canada).
12. Brewster, M.Q. Solid propellant combustion response: Quasi-steady (QSHOD) theory development and validation. In Solid Propellant Chemistry, Combustion, and Motor Interior Ballistics, edited by V. Yang, T.B. Brill and W.-Z. Ren, pp. 607-638, 2000 (AIAA: Reston, VA), Volume 185 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics.
13. Carrier, G., Fendell, F., Brent, D., Kimdrough, C., Loucks, S., Hess, E. and Acosta, P. Simple modeling of particle trajectories in solid rocket motors. J. Propulsion Power, 1991, 7(2), 185-195.
14. Ciucci, A., Iaccarino, G. and Amato, M. Numerical investigation of 3D two-phase turbulent flows in solid rocket motors. AIAA Paper, 1998, 98-3966.
15. Coirier, W.J. and Powell, K.G. An accuracy assessment of Cartesianmesh approaches for the Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys., 1995, 117, 121-131.
16. Colella, P. and Woodward, P.R. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 1984, 54, 174-210.
17. Daniel, E., Basset, T. and Loraud, J.C. Eulerian approach for unsteady two-phase reactive solid rocket motor flows loaded with aluminum particles. AIAA Paper, 1999, 98-3697.
18. Davis, R.L. and Dannenhoffer, J.F. Decomposition and parallelization strategies for adaptive gridembedding techniques. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 1993, 1, 79-93.
19. De Zeeuw, D. and Powell, K.G. An adaptively refined Cartesian mesh solver for the Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys., 1993, 104, 56-68.
20. Dick, W.A. and Heath, M.T. Whole system simulation of solid propellant rockets. AIAA Paper, 2002, 02-4345.
21. Einfeldt, B. On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1988, 25, 294-318.
22. Godunov, S.K. Finite-difference method for numerical computations of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Mat. Sb., 1959, 47, 271-306.
23. Gottlieb, J.J. and Groth, C.P.T. Assessment of Riemann solvers for unsteady one-dimensional inviscid flows of perfect gases. J. Comput. Phys., 1988, 78, 437-458.
24. Gottlieb, J.J. and Groth, C.P.T. Collection of boundary conditions for one-and some multidimensional unsteady flows of polytropic gases. CASI J., 1999, 45(2), 161-182.
25. Greatrix, D.R. Combined structural oscillation effects on solid rocket internal ballistics. AIAA Paper, 1999, 99-2509.
26. Greatrix, D.R. and Gottlieb, J.J. Erosive burning model for composite-propellant rocket motors with large length-to-diameter ratios. Can. Aeronaut. Space J., 1987, 33(3), 133-142.
27. Greatrix, D.R., Gottlieb, J.J. and Constantinou, T. Quasi-steady analysis of the internal ballistics of solid-propellant rocket motors. Can. Aeronaut. Space J., 1987, 33(2), 61-70.
28. Greatrix, D.R., Gottlieb, J.J. and Constantinou, T. Numerical model for pellet-dispersion igniter systems. J. Propulsion Power, 1988, 4(5), 412-420.
29. Gropp. W., Lusk, E. and Skjellum, A., Using MPI, 1999 (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA).
30. Groth, C.P.T., Zeeuw, D.L.D., Powell, K.G., Gombosi, T.I. and Stout, Q.F. A parallel solution-adaptive scheme for ideal magnetohydro-dynamics. AIM Paper, 1999, 99-3273.
31. Groth, C.P.T., De Zeeuw, D.L., Gombosi, T.I. and Powell, K.G. Global three-dimensional MHD simulation of a space weather event: CME formation, interplanetary propagation, and and interaction with the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 2000, 105(A11), 25,053-25,078.
32. Harten, A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys., 1983, 49, 357-393.
33. Harten, A. On a class of high resolution total-variation-stable finite-difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1984, 21, 1-23.
34. Harten, A., Enquist, B., Osher, S. and Chakravarthy, S.R. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys., 1987, 71, 231-303.
35. Hartmann, R. and Houston, P. Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 2002, 24(3), 979-1004.
36. Hwang, C.J. and Chang, G.C. Numerical study of gas-particle flow in a solid rocket nozzle. AIAA J., 1988, 26(6), 682-689.
37. King, M.K. Erosive burning of composite solid propellants: experimental and modeling studies. J. Spacecraft Rockets, 1979, 16(7), 154-162.
38. van Leer. B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. I. The quest of monotonicity. Lecture Notes in Physics. 18, pp. 163-168, 1973 (Springer-Verlag: New York).
39. van Leer, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. J. Comput. Phys., 1974, 14, 361-370.
40. van Leer, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. III. Upstream-centered finite difference schemes for ideal compressible flow. J. Comput. Phys., 1977a, 23, 263-275.
41. van Leer, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection. J. Comput. Phys., 1977b, 23, 276-299.
42. van Leer, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys., 1979, 32, 101-136.
43. van Leer, B. Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations. Lecture Notes in Physics, 170, p. 507, 1982 (Springer-Verlag: New York).
44. van Leer, B., Tai, C.H. and Powell, K.G. Design of optimally-smoothing multi-stage schemes for the Euler equations. AIAA Paper, 1989, 89-1933-CP.
45. Linde, T. A practical, general-purpose, two-state HLL Riemann solver for hyperbolic conservation laws. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 2002, 40, 391-402.
46. Marble, F.E. Dynamics of dusty gases. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 1970, 2, 397-446.
47. Najjar, P.M., Balachandar, S., Alavilli, P.V.S. and Ferry, J. Computations of two-phase flow in aluminized solid propellant rockets. AIAA Paper, 2000, 00-3568.
48. Najjar, F.M., Ferry, J., Wasistho, B. and Balachandar, S. Full-physics large-scale multiphase large eddy simulations of flow inside solid rocket motors. AIM Paper, 2002, 02-4343.
49. Najjar, P.M., Haselbacher, A., Ferry, J., Wasistho, B., Balachandar, S. and Moser, R.D. Large-scale multiphase large-eddy simulation of flows inside solid-rocket motors. AIAA Paper, 2003, 03-3700.
50. Orbekk, E. Internal flow analysis of a technology demonstrator rocket motor with new CFD code. AIAA Paper, 1998, 98-3967.
51. Osher, S. Riemann solvers, the entropy condition, and difference approximations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1984, 21(2), 217-235.
52. Paillère, H., Powell, K.G. and De Zeeuw, D.L. A wave-model-based refinement criterion for adaptive-grid computation of compressible flows. AIAA Paper, 1992, 92-0322.
53. Peskin, C.S. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer., 2002, 1-39.
54. Powell, K.G., Roe, P.L. and Quirk, J. Adaptive-mesh algorithms for computational fluid dynamics. In Algorithmic Trends in Computational Fluid Dynmaics, edited by M.Y. Hussaini, A. Kumar and M.D. Salas, pp. 303-337, 1993 (Springer-Verlag: New York).
55. Powell, K.G., Roe, P.L., Linde, T.J., Gombosi, T.I. and De Zeeuw, D.L. A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys., 1999, 154, 284-309.
56. Quirk, J.J. An adaptive grid algorithm for computational shock hydrodynamics. PhD thesis, 1991, Cranfield Institute of Technology.
57. Quirk, J.J. and Hanebutte, U.R. A parallel adaptive mesh refinement algorithm, 1993, Report 93-63, ICASE.
58. Renie, J.P. and Osborn, J.R. Erosive burning. AIAA J., 1983, 21(12), 1681-1689.
59. Roe, P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 1981, 43, 357-372.
60. Roe, P.L. (1984) Generalized formulation of TVD Lax-Wendroff schemes, Report 84-53, ICASE.
61. Rudinger, G. Fundamentals of gas-particle flow, 1980 (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam).
62. Sabnis, J.S. Numerical simulations of distributed combustion in solid rocket motors with metalized propellant. J. Propulsion Power, 2003, 19(1), 48-55.
63. Sachdev, J.S., Groth, C.P.T. and Gottlieb, J.J. Parallel solution-adaptive scheme for multi-phase core flows in rocket motors. AIAA Paper, 2003, 03-4106.
64. Sauerwein, H. and Fendell, F.E. Method of characteristics in two-phase flow. Phys. Fluids, 1965, 8, 1564-1565 Research Note.
65. Saurel, R., Daniel, E. and Loraud, J.C. Two-phase flows: second-order schemes and boundary conditions, AIAA J., 1994, 32(6), 1214-1221.
66. Sethian, J.A. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods, 2nd Ed., 1999 (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics).
67. Slater, S.A. and Young, J.B. The calculation of inertial particle transport in dilute gas-particle flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 2001, 27, 61-87.
68. Sun, M. and Takayama, K. Conservative smoothing on an adaptive quadrilateral grid. J. Comput. Phys., 1999, 150, 143-180.
69. Surzhikov, S.T., Murphy, J.J. and Krier, H. 2D model for unsteady burning heterogenous AP/binder solid propellants. AIAA Paper, 2000, 00-3573.
70. Venkatakrishnan, V. On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions. AIAA Paper, 1993, 93-0880.
71. Vuillot, F., Basset, T., Dupays, J., Daniel, E. and Lupoglazoff, N. 2D Navier-Stokes stability computations for solid rocket motors: rotational, combustion and two-phase flow effects. AIM Paper, 1997, 97-3326.
72. Yee, H.C. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. J. Comput. Phys., 1987, 68, 151-179.