The role of demand underscheduling in the California energy crisis

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue , 2004, Pages 783-790

  Hausman, Ezra D ^a   Tabors, Richard D ^a  

^a Tabors Caramanis and Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC RATES; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MARKETING; PURCHASING; SCHEDULING;

BIDDING; CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ELECTRICITY MARKETS; PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC (CO);

ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT;

EID: 12344331455     PISSN: 10603425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2004.1265170     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Van Vactor, S. and F. Pickel, "Money, Power and Trade", Public Utilities Fortnightly, Vol. 139, No. 11, May 15, 2001.
2. San Diego Gas & Electric v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System Operator Corp. and the California Power Exchange Corp., 93 FERC 61, 121 at 61, 359-62 (2000).
3. Stoft, Steven, Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. Wiley-Interscience, 2002.
4. Jurewitz, John, "California's Electricity Debacle: A Guided Tour", The Electricity Journal, May, 2002, pp. 10-29.
5. California ISO Department of Market Analysis, "The Firm Transmission Rights Market: Review of the First Nine Months of Operation, February 1 - October 31, 2000", November 30, 2000.
6. New York Independent System Operator, Inc., "Evaluation of the Impact of Virtual Trading on the Summer 2002 New York Electricity Markets", filed as FERC Docket Nos. ER01-3009-000, ER01-3153-000 and EL00-90-000, 12/16/02.
7. FERC Docket No. PA02-2-000, Final Report on Price Manipulation in Western Markets, 3/26/03, Chapter VI.