|
Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 304-306
|
Pathological validity of esophageal endoscopy. How real is what we see? Myth or reality?
|
Author keywords
Endoscopy; Esophageal biopsy; Pathological validity
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BARRETT ESOPHAGUS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
DYSPLASIA;
ERYTHEMA;
ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA;
ESOPHAGITIS;
ESOPHAGOSCOPY;
ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY;
ESOPHAGUS DISEASE;
HUMAN;
INTESTINE METAPLASIA;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA;
VALIDATION PROCESS;
ADENOCARCINOMA;
BARRETT ESOPHAGUS;
BIOPSY;
CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS;
ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS;
ESOPHAGITIS;
ESOPHAGOSCOPY;
FEMALE;
GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX;
HUMANS;
MALE;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 12344329191
PISSN: 11208694
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00430.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (7)
|