Evaluation of a human-robot interface: Development of a situational awareness methodology

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue , 2004, Pages 2077-2086

  Scholtz, Jean ^a   Antonishek, Brian ^a   Young, Jeff ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AIRCRAFT; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER CONTROL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

DYNAMIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERFACES (HRI); ROBOTIC VEHICLES; SITUATIONAL AWARENESS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 12344326627     PISSN: 10603425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2004.1265327     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bell, H. and Lyon, D. Using Observer Ratings to Assess Situation Awareness (2000) in Mica R. Endsley and Daniel J. Garland (Eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey. 129-146.
2. Drivers-ZED® for Adult Drivers, AAA foundation for Traffic Safety, 1-800-305-SAFE.
3. Drury, J, Scholtz, J, and Yanco, H. 2003. Awareness in Human-Robot Interactions, to be presented at 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics.
4. Endsley, M. 2000. Theoretical Underpinning of Situation Awareness: Critical Review (2000) in Mica R. Endsley and Daniel J. Garland (Eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey. 3-32.
5. nd Annual Meeting, vol. 1, 97-101. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
6. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7. th International Symposium of Robotics Research, November, Lorne, Victoria, Australia.
8. Jones, D. Subjective Measures of Situation Awareness (2000) in Mica R. Endsley and Daniel J. Garland (Eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey. 113-128.
9. Mayhew, D. 1992. Principles and Guidelines in Software User Interface Design, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 494.
10. Murphy, R. 2000. Introduction to AI ROBOTICS. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
11. NASA Task Load Index (TLX), Human Performance Research Group, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett field, California, v.1.0.
12. Pritchett, A. and Hansman, R. Use of Testable Responses for Performance-Based Measurement of Situation Awareness (2000) in Mica R. Endsley and Daniel J. Garland (Eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 189-209.
13. Scholtz, J. 2002. Creating Synergistic CyberForces in Alan C. Schultz and Lynne E. Parker (eds.), Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata. Kluwer.
14. Scholtz, J. 2003. Human-robot Interactions: Creating Synergistic Cyberforces. Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Jan. 2003.
15. Scholtz, J. and Bahrami, S. 2003. Human-Robot Interaction: Development of an evaluation methodology for the Bystander Role to be presented at 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics.
16. Scholtz, J., Antonishek, B., and Young, J. 2003. Evaluation of Operator Interventions in Autonomous Off-road Driving, to be presented at PerMIS 2003.
17. Yanco, H., Drury, J. and Scholtz, J. In Press. Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition. To appear in Human-Computer Interaction