A stakeholder model of business intelligence

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue , 2004, Pages 3509-3517

  Simmers, Claire A ^a  

^a SAINT JOSEPH S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; FUNCTIONS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

HUMAN CAPITAL; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDERS;

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 12344318045     PISSN: 10603425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2004.1265516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Albert, S. 1998. Knowledge management: Living up to the hope. Midrange Systems, 11(13): 52.
2. Arthanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. 2000. Intel-nationalization, tacit knowledge and the top management teams of MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3): 471-487.
3. Barley, S.R. 1990. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:61-103.
4. Boisot, M.H. 1999. Knowledge Assets; Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Boon, C. 1998. In pursuit of business intelligence. Document World 3(6): 18-24.
6. Cooper, R., Kaplan, R.S., Maisel, L.S., Morrissey, E., & Oehm, R. M. 1992. Implementing Activity-Based Cost Management: Moving from Analysis to Action, Institute of Management Accountants: Montvale, NJ.
7. D'Aveni, R. M. 1994. Hypercompetition. New York: The Free Press.
8. Davidow, W.H., & Malone, M.S. 1992. The Virtual Corporation. New York: HarperCollins.
9. Denison, D.R. 1997. Toward a process-based theory of organizational design: Can organizations be designed around value chains and networks? Adv. Strategic Management 14: 1-44.
10. Dijksterhuis, M.S., Van den Bosch, F.A. J., Volberda, H.W. 1999. Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organization Science 10(5): 569-582.
11. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.
12. Eisenhardt, K., & Schoonhoven, D. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7: 136-150.
13. Evans & Wurster, 2000. Blown to bits. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. 1990. Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484-503.
15. Grant, Robert M. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter 1996): 109-122.
16. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. 1989. Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review 67(3): 63-76.
17. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. 1994. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Press: Boston.
18. Hansotia, B., 2002. Gearing up for CRM: Antecedents to successful implementation. Journal of Database Marketing 10(2): 121-132.
19. Harreld, H. 2002. BI commands performance. www.Infoworld.com. 09.23.02, 40-41.
20. Hibbard, J. 1997. Ernst & Young deploys app for knowledge management. Information Week, July 28: 28.
21. Hoelscher, R. 2002. Business intelligence platforms boost ERP. Financial Executive 18(2): 66-69.
22. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
23. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
24. Lesser, E.L. & Storck, J. 2001. Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 831-841.
25. Malhotra, Y. 2000. From information management to knowledge management: Beyond "Hi-Tech Hidebound" systems. In Srikantaiah, T. K. and Koenig, M.E.D. (Eds.). Knowledge Management. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 37-62.
26. Margulius, D.L. 2002. Building toward BPM. http://www.Infoworld.com. 09.23.02, 40-41.
27. Moncla, B. 2000. The rise of the i-Market: The convergence of E-Business and Business Intelligence. http://www.dmreview.com/master.cfm?NavID=198&E DIB=2538.August.
28. Nass, C. 1994. Knowledge or skills: Which do administrators learn from experience? Organisation Science, 5: 38-50.
29. Ragins E.J., & Greco, A.J. 2003. Customer relationship management and E-business: More than a software solution. Review of Business 24(1): 25-30.
30. Ring, P.S. & Van de Yen, 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 19(1): 90-118.
31. Roberts, J. 2000. From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12(4): 429-444.
32. Schneider, M. 2002. A stakeholder model of organizational leadership. Organization Science 13(2): 209-220.
33. Simonin, B.L. 1997. The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5): 1150-1174.
34. Solomon, C.M. 2001. Managing Virtual Teams, Workforce, June, 2001: 60-65.
35. Stamps, D. 1997. Communities of practice: Learning is social. Training is irrelevant? Training. February: 34-42.
36. Stimpson, J. 2003. CRM is Hot! Practical Accountant 36(1): 38-41.
37. Stewart, G.L. & Manz, C.C. 1995. Leadership for self-managing work teams: A typology and integrative model. Human Relations 48(7): 747-770.
38. Wheatley, M.J. 1992. Leadership and the New Science. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco,CA.