Managerial use and emerging norms: Effects of activity patterns on software design and deployment

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue , 2004, Pages 595-604

  Grudin, Jonathan ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERSONNEL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; USER INTERFACES; VIDEO CONFERENCING; WEB BROWSERS;

APPLICATION SHARING; DESKTOP VIDEOCONFERENCING; SOFTWARE DEPLOYMENT; TASK ANALYSIS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 12344314169     PISSN: 10603425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2004.1265111     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bälter, O. (2000): Keystroke level analysis of email message organization. Proc. CHI 2000, 105-112.
2. Bälter, O. (2002): Give the boss a break from email: Managers and their communication. Proc. NordiCHI 2002.
3. Bälter, O. & Sidner, C. (2002): Bifrost Inbox Organizer: Giving users control over the inbox. Proc. NordiCHI 2002.
4. Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998): Contextual design. Morgan Kaufmann.
5. BLS (2002): Computer and Internet use at work in 2001. Bureau of Labor Statistics report. USDL-02-601.
6. Carroll, J. (2000): Making use: Scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT.
7. Cooper, A. (1999): The inmates are running the asylum. Macmillan.
8. Fischer, G., Lemke, A. & Schwab, T. (1984): Active help systems. In T. Green et al. (Eds.), Proc. European. Conf. on Cognitive Ergonomics, 116-131. Springer-Verlag.
9. Horvitz, E. (1999): Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Proc. CHI'99, 159-166.
10. Jackson, M. (Feb. 3, 2002): Last days of the corporate technophobe. New York Times.
11. Jones, W. P., Bruce, H. & Dumais, S. T. (2001): Keeping found things found on the web. Proc. CIKM 2001, 119-126.
12. Kling, R. (1992): Behind the terminal: The critical role of computing infrastructure in effective information systems' development and use. In W. Cotterman & J. Senn (Eds.) Challenges and strategies for research in systems development, 153-201. Wiley.
13. Mark, G. (2002): Conventions and commitments in distributed CSCW groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 349-387.
14. Mintzberg, H. (1984): A typology of organizational structure. In D. Miller & P. H. Friesen (Eds.), Organizations: A quantum view (pp. 68-86). Prentice-Hall. Reprinted in R. Baecker (Ed.), Readings in groupware and computer-supported cooperative work. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
15. Mintzberg, H. (1989): Mintzberg on management. Free Press.
16. Orlikowski, W. (1992): Learning from Notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proc. CSCW'92, 362-369. ACM.
17. Palen, L. (1998): Calendars on the New Frontier: Challenges of Groupware Technology. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
18. Palen, L. & Grudin, J. (2002): Discretionary adoption of group support software: Lessons from calendar applications. In B.E. Munkvold (Ed.), Organizational implementation of collaboration technology. Springer.
19. Perin, C. (1991): Electronic social fields in bureaucracies. Comm. ACM, 34, 12, 74-82.
20. Pickering, J.M. & King, J.L. (1992): Hardwiring weak ties: Individual and institutional issues in computer mediated communication. Proc. CSCW 92, 356-361.
21. Vicente, K. (1999): Cognitive work analysis. Erlbaum.
22. Whittaker, S. & Sidner, C. (1996): Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proc. CHI 96, 276-283.