Satisfaction attainment theory as a model for value creation

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue , 2004, Pages 185-194

  Briggs, Robert O ^a,b   Qureshi, Sajda ^c   Reinig, Bruce ^d  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^d SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SATISFACTION ATTAINMENT THEORY (SAT); SET OF SALIENT GOALS (SSG); SHIFT IN THE YIELD ASSESSMENT (SYA); STAKEHOLDERS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INVESTMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 12344305217     PISSN: 10603425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. 2000.
2. Barua, A. and T. Mukhopadhyay. Information Technology and Business Performance: Past, present and future." In R. Zmud, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past. Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati. 2000.
3. Barua, A., Kriebel, C.H. and T. Mukhopadhyay. Information Technology and Business Value: An Analytical and Empirical Investigation. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 3-23, 1995.
4. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 2000.
5. Briggs, R.O., Adkins, M., Mittleman, D., Kruse, J., Miller, S., & Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. A Technology Transition Model Derived from Field Investigation of GSS use aboard U.S.S. CORONADO, Journal of Management Information Systems. 15(3), 151-193, 1999.
6. Briggs, R.O, Reinig, B. A., and Vreede, G.J. de. Satisfaction Attainment Theory and its Application To Group Support Systems Meeting Satisfaction. Information Science and Technology Working Paper Series, 1(1), College of Information Science and Technology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2003.
7. Brynjolfsson, E. and L. Hitt. Beyond the Productivity Paradox. Communications of the ACM. 41(8), 49-55, 1998.
8. Checkland, P. Systems Thinking Systems Practice. Wiley and Sons. Chichester. 1981.
9. Cragg, P.B. and M. King "Small firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors," MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 47-60, 1993.
10. Delone, W.H. Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 51-61, 1998.
11. Greenspan, A. Chairman of the Federal Reserve, in a speech to the National Association for Business Economics, as quoted in the New York Times, March 28, 2001.
12. Hlupic, V. and Qureshi, S. What causes value to be created when it did not exist before? A Research Model for Value Creation. Proceedings of the 36th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE., January 6-9, 2003
13. Keil, M., Truex, D.P., and Mixon, R., "The Effects of Sunk Cost and Project Completion on Information Technology Project Escalation," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(4), 372-381, 1995.
14. Keil, M., "Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation," MIS Quarterly., 19(4), 421-447, 1999
15. Keil, M., and Mann, J., "The Nature and Extent of IT Project Escalation: Results From a Survey of IS Audit and Control Professionals (Part 1)," IS Audit and Control Journal, 1(1) 40-48, 1997.
16. Land, F. and R. Hirschheim. "Participative Systems Design". Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 91-107, 1983.
17. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. and M. Erez. "Determinants of Goal Commitment". Academy of Management Review. 13(1) 23-39, 1988.
18. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.
19. Miller, G.A., (1956), The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 63(1), 81-97.
20. Mitroff, J. Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind. San Francisco: Josey Bass. 1985.
21. Mobley, W.H., Locke, E.A. The relationship of value importance to satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 463-483.
22. Mumford, E. and M. Weir. Computer Systems in Work Design: The ETHICS Method. New York: Wiley. 1979.
23. Pinker, S. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press, 2002.
24. Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge, 1959.
25. Por The Value of Emergent Value Creation 'models in the Knowledge Economy, Position paper presented to the European Commission's Directorate-General Information Society, Brussels. May, 2000.
26. Reinig, B.A. Towards an understanding of satisfaction with the process and outcomes of teamwork. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 2003.
27. Stultz, D.M., Messé, L.A., & Kerr, N.L. Belief-discrepant behavior and the bogus pipeline: impression management or arousal attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 20(1), 47-54, 1984.
28. Sutherland, W.A., Introduction to metric and topological spaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975.
29. Winston, E. R. and D. Dologite "How does Attitude Impact IT Implementation: A Study of Small Business Owners", Journal of End User Computing. pp: 16-29, April-June 2002.
30. Vroom, V.C. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
31. Weick, K. E. Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell. 2001.
32. Whitaker, A.C. History and criticism of the Labor Theory of Value In English Political Economy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1904.
33. Zhu, K. and K. Kraemer. "eCommerce Metrics for net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the value of eCommerce to Firm Performance in the manufacturing Sector." Information Systems Research. 13(3):275-295, 2002.