A conjunctive parallelogram model for pick any/n data

Psychometrika

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 401-420

  Leenen, Iwin ^a   Van Mechelen, Iven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Binary data; Choice data analysis; Noncompensatory combination rule; Parallelogram analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344305157     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02295643     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (3rd ed., pp. 231-309). New York: Random House.
2. Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.
3. Andrich, D. (1989). A probabilistic IRT model for unfolding preference data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 193-216.
4. Andrich, D. (1995). Hyperbolic cosine latent trait models for unfolding direct responses and pairwise preferences. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 269-290.
5. Andrich, D., & Luo, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.
6. Arabie, P. (1991). Was Euclid an unnecessarily sophisticated psychologist? Psychometrika, 56, 567-587.
7. Arabie, P., & Hubert, L. (1992). Combinatorial data analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 169-203.
8. Barbut, M., & Monjardet, B. (1970). Ordre et classification: Algèbre et combinatoire [Order and classification: Algebra and combinatorics]. Paris: Hachette.
9. Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts. Chichester, England: Wiley.
10. Böckenholt, U., & Böckenholt, I. (1991). Constrained latent class analysis: Simultaneous classification and scaling of discrete choice data. Psychometrika, 56, 699-716.
11. Booth, K. S., & Lueker, G. S. (1976). Testing for the consecutive ones property, interval graphs, and graph planarity using PQ-tree algorithms. Journal of Compute and System Sciences, 13, 335-379.
12. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Carroll, J. D., & Chaturvedi, A. (1995). A general approach to clustering and multidimensional scaling of two-way, three-way, or higher-way data. In R. D. Luce, M. D'Zmura, D. Hoffman, G. J. Iverson & A. K. Romney (Eds.), Geometric representations of perceptual phenomena (pp. 295-318). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
15. Coombs, C. H., & Smith, J. E. (1973). On the detection of structure in attitudes and developmental processes. Psychological Review, 80, 344-358.
16. Croon, M. (1993). Ordinal latent class analysis for single-peaked items. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 42, 127-142.
17. DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1986). Simple and weighted unfolding treshold models for the spatial representation of binary choice data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 247-264.
18. Falmagne, J.-C., Koppen, M., Vilano, M., Doignon, J.-P., & Johannesen, L. (1990). Introduction to knowledge spaces: How to build, test and search them. Psychological Review, 97, 201-224.
19. Feger, H. (1994). Structure analysis of co-occurence data. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
20. Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Process tracing methods: contributions, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75-117.
21. Formann, A. K. (1988). Latent class models for nonmonotone dichotomous items. Psychometrika, 53, 45-62.
22. Formann, A. K. (1993). Latent class models for monotone and nonmonotone dichotomous items. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 42, 143-160.
23. Fulkerson, D. R., & Gross, O. A. (1965). Incidence matrices and interval graphs. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 15, 835-855.
24. Ganter, B., & Wille, R. (1996). Formale begriffsanalyse: Mathematische grundlagen [Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
25. Gara, M. A., & Rosenberg, S. (1979). The identification of persons as supersets and subsets in free-response personality descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2161-2170.
26. Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1982). Representations of qualitative and quantitative dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 325-340.
27. Gelman, A., Leenen, I., Van Mechelen, I., De Boeck, P., & Poblome, J. (2001). Bridges between deterministic and probabilistic classification models. Submitted for publication.
28. Ghosh, S. P. (1972). File organization: the consecutive retrieval property. Communication of the Association for Computing Machinery, 9, 802-808.
29. Goldmann, K. (1971). Some archaeological criteria for chronological seriation. In F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall & P. Tǎutu (Eds.), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences: Proceedings of the Anglo-Romanian Conference (pp. 202-208). Edinburgh, Scotland: University Press.
30. Haggard, E. A. (1958). Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Dryden.
31. Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley.
32. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (Fifth ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.
33. Hoijtink, H. (1990). A latent trait model for choice data. Psychometrika, 55, 641-656.
34. Hoijtink, H. (1991). The measurement of latent traits by proximity items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 153-169.
35. Hoijtink, H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1992). Testing for DIP in a model with single peaked item characteristic curves: The PARELLA model. Psychometrika, 57, 383-397.
36. Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 55, 244-252.
37. Kendall, D. G. (1969). Incidence matrices, interval graphs and seriation in archaeology. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 28, 565-570.
38. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39. Leenen, I., & Van Mechelen, I. (2001). An evaluation of two algorithms for hierarchical classes analysis. Journal of Classification, 18, 57-80.
40. Leenen, I., Van Mechelen, I., & De Boeck, P. (1999). A generic disjunctive/conjunctive decomposition model for n-ary relations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 102-122.
41. Leenen, I., Van Mechelen, I., & De Boeck, P. (2001). Models for ordinal hierarchical classes analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 389-404.
42. Leik, R. K., & Matthews, M. (1968). A scale for developmental processes. American Sociological Review, 33, 62-75.
43. Luo, G. (1998). A general formulation of multidimensional unfolding models involving the latitude of acceptance. In A. Rizzi, M. Vichi & H.-H. Bock (Eds.), Advances in data science and classification (pp. 483-488). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
44. Ogilvie, J. R., & Schmitt, N. (1979). Situational influences on linear and nonlinear use of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 337-352.
45. Roberts, J. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996). A unidimensional item response model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree-agree scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 231-255.
46. Smits, D. J. M., De Boeck, P., Kuppens, P., & Van Mechelen, I. (2002). The structure of negative emotion scales: Generalization over contexts and comprehensiveness. European Journal of Personality, 16, 127-141.
47. Tucker, A. C. (1972). A structure theorem for the consecutive l's property. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 12, 153-162.
48. van Leeuwe, J. F. J., & Roskam, E. E. (1991). The conjunctive item response model: A probabilistic extension of the Coombs and Kao model. Methodika, 5, 14-32.
49. Van Schuur, W. H. (1993a). MUDFOLD. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 42, 39-54.
50. Van Schuur, W. H. (1993b). Unfolding models for pick any/n data: a summary and discussion. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 42, 161-176.
51. Vansteelandt, K., & Van Mechelen, I. (1998). Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: A triple typology model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 751-765.
52. Verhelst, N. D., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (1993). A stochastic unfolding model derived from the partial credit model. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 42, 73-92.
53. Westenberg, M. R. M., & Koele, P. (1992). Response modes, decision processes and decision outcomes. Acta Psychologica, 80, 169-184.