Early mammalian embryo development depends on cumulus removal technique

Lab on a Chip

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 86-90

  Zeringue, H C ^a,b   Rutledge, J J ^c   Beebe, D J ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CUMULUS OOPHORUS; DOSE RESPONSE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROFLUIDICS; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA TRANSCRIPTION;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 12344304482     PISSN: 14730197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b316494m     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G. Palermo, H. Joris, P. Devroey and A. C. V. Steirteghem, Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte, Lancet, 1992, 340, 17-18.
2. I. Wilmut, A. E. Schnieke, J. McWhir, A. J. Kind and K. H. Campbell, Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells, Nature, 1997, 385, 810-813.
3. T. Wakayama, A. C. Perry, M. Zuccotti, K. R. Johnson and R. Yanagimachi, Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei, Nature, 1998, 394, 369-374.
4. R. M. Schultz and C. J. Williams, The science of art, Science, 2002, 296, 2188-2190.
5. S. Kattera, P. Shrivastav and I. Craft, Comparison of pregnancy outcome of pronuclear- and multicellular-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers, J. Assist. Reprod. Genetics, 1999, 16, 358-362.
6. D. J. Beebe, M. Wheeler, H. C. Zeringue, E. Walters and S. Raty, Microfluidic technology for assisted reproduction, Theriogenology, 2002, 57, 125-135.
7. S. Raty, J. A. Davis, D. J. Beebe, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas and M. B. Wheeler, Culture in microchannels enhance in vitro embryonic development of preimplantation mouse embryos, Theriogenology, 2001, 55, 241.
8. B. S. Cho, T. G. Schuster, X. Y. Zhu, D. Chang, G. D. Smith and S. Takayama, Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm, Anal. Chem., 2003, 75, 1671-1675.
9. A. Sawano, S. Takayama, M. Matsuda and A. Miyawaki, Lateral propagation of egf signalling after local stimulation is dependent on receptor density, Developmental Cell, 2002, 3, 245-257.
10. H. C. Zeringue, D. J. Beebe and M. B. Wheeler, Removal of cumulus from mammalian zygotes using microfluidic techniques, Biomed. Microdevices, 2001, 3, 219-224.
11. Y. Fukui and Y. Sakuma, Maturation of bovine oocytes cultured in vitro: Relation to ovarian activity, follicular size and the presence or absence of cumulus cells, Biol. Reprod., 1980, 22, 669-673.
12. R. C. Chian, K. Okuda and K. Niwa, Influence of cumulus cells on in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes derived from in vitro maturation, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 1995, 38, 37-48.
13. A. Martino, T. Mogas, M. J. Palomo and M. T. Paramio, In vitro maturation and fertilization of prepubertal goat oocytes, Theriogenology, 1995, 43, 472-485.
14. D. P. Wolf, in In vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, ed. D.P. Wolf, Plenum Press, New York, 1988, 132-135.
15. A. G. Sacco and C. A. Shivers, in Methods in Mammalian Reproduction, ed. J.C. Daniel, Academic Press, New York, 1978, 214-216.
16. A. S. Doherty and R. M. Schultz, in Developmental Biology Protocols, ed. R. S. Tuan and C.W. Lo, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 50-51.
17. B. Hogan, R. Beddington, F. Costantini and E. Lacy, Manipulating the Mouse Embryo, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Harbor Springs, NY, 2nd edn., 1994.
18. A. Fisher, D. P. Bernal, C. Guiterrez-Robayo and J. J. Rutledge, Estimates of heterosis for in vitro embryo production using reciprocal crosses in cattle, Theriogenology, 2000, 54, 1433-1442.
19. G. E. P. Box, Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, i. Effects of inequality of variance in the one-way classification, Ann. Math. Stat., 1954, 25, 290-302.
20. F. Aoki, D. M. Worrad and R. M. Schultz, Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo, Develop. Biol., 1997, 181, 296-307.
21. J. Wu, Mechanisms of animal cell damage associated with gas bubbles and cell protection by medium additives, J. Biotechnol., 1995, 43, 81-94.
22. S. Mercille, M. Johnson, S. Lanthier, A. A. Kamen and B. Massie, Understanding factors that limit the productivity of suspension-based perfusion cultures operated at high medium renewal rates, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2000, 67, 465-450.
23. P. J. M. Hendriksen, W. N. M. Steenweg, J. C. Harkeme, J. S. Merton, M. M. Bevers, P. L. A. M. Vos and S. J. Dieleman, Effects of different stages of the follicular wave on in vitro developmental competence of bovine oocytes, Theriogenology, 2004, 61, 909-920.
24. G. Vajta, T. T. Peura, P. Holm, A. Paldi, T. Greve, A. O. Trounson and H. Callesen, New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: The well of the well (wow) system, Mol. Reprod. Develop., 2000, 55, 256-264.
25. P. Lonergan, D. Rizos, A. Gutierrez-Adan, P. M. Moreira, B. Pintado and J. de la Fuente, Temporal divergence in the pattern of messenger rna expression in bovine embryos cultured from zygotes to blastocyst stage in vitro or in vivo, Biol. Reprod., 2003, 69, 1424-1431.
26. E. Christians, E. Campion, E. M. Thompson and J. P. Renard, Expression of the hsp 70.1 gene, a landmark of early zygotic activity in the mouse embryo, is restricted to the first burst of transcription, Development, 1995, 121, 113-122.
27. M. Lane and D. K. Gardner, Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids, J. Reprod. Fertility, 1997, 109, 153-164.
28. G. Lazzari, C. Wrenzycki, D. Herrmann, R. Duchi, T. Kruip, H. Niemann and C. Galli, Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome, Biol. Reprod., 2002, 67, 767-775.
29. J. Eckert and H. Niemann, Mrna expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor (lif) and its receptor subunits glycoprotein 130 and lif-receptor-beta in bovine embryos derived in vitro or in vivo, Mol. Hum. Reprod., 1998, 4, 957-965.
30. P. Hyttel, et al., Ribosomal rna gene expression and chromosome aberrations in bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos, Reproduction, 2001, 122, 21-30.
31. R. W. Wright and J. Ellington, Morphological and physiological differences between in vivo- and in vitro-produced preimplantation embryos from livestock species, Theriogenology, 1995, 44, 1167-1189.
32. H. Niemann and C. Wrenzycki, Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: Implementations for subsequent development, Theriogenology, 2000, 53, 21-34.
33. G. M. Walker, H. C. Zeringue and D. J. Beebe, Microenvironment design considerations for cellular scale studies, Lab Chip, 2004, 4, 91-97.