Challenging the paradigms on up-stream B2B E-commerce?

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 37, Issue , 2004, Pages 2615-2624

  Juul, Niels Christian ^a   Andersen, Kim Viborg ^b   Korzen Bohr, Sara ^b  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; CORRELATION METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVENTORY CONTROL; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; XML;

CONSTANT GROWTH RATES; DATA ADOPTION; DATA INTEGRATION; DIGITALIZATION;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 12344293384     PISSN: 10603425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2004.1265408     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Andersen, K. V., Bjørn-Andersen, N., & Dedrick, J. (2003). Governance Initiatives Creating a Demand-Driven E-Commerce Approach: The Case of Denmark. Information Society, 19(1), pp. 95-105.
2. Andersen, K. V., Bjørn-Andersen, N., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2003). Globalization and E-commerce: Environment and Policy in Denmark. Irvine, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine. Also forthcoming in CAIS. URL http://crito.uci.edu/publications/pdf/GEC/DenmarkGEC2.pdf (last access August 152003)
3. Andersen, K. V., Juul, N. C., Henriksen, H. Z., Bjørn-Andersen, N. & Bunker, D. (2000). Business-to-business e-commerce: Enterprises facing a turbulent world. DJØF Publishing, Copenhagen, Denmark, November 2000.
4. Andersen, K. V., & Juul, N. C. (2003). EDI: Third-Party Traffic Still Rising. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference, e-Society 2003. Volume 2, p. 1023. Lisbon, Portugal June 3-6.
5. Attewell, P. (1992). Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing. Organization Science, 3(1), pp. 1-19.
6. Austin, R. D., & McFarlan, F. W. (1997). H. E. Butt Grocery Co.: A Leader in ECR Implementation (B). Harvard Business School Case (Field) 9-198-016.
7. Bergeron, F., & Raymond, L. (1992). The Advantages of Electronic Data Interchange. DATABASE Advances, 23(4), pp. 19-31.
8. Bjørn-Andersen, N., & Andersen, K. V. (forthcoming). Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: The Case of Denmark. Irvine, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine. URL: http://crito.uci.edu/publications/ pdf7GEC/
9. Chan, C., & Swatman, P. (2003). B2B E-Commerce Implementation in the Australian Context. Communications of Association of Information Systems (CAIS) 11 (article 23).
10. Chatfield, A.T. & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (1997). The Impact of IOS-enabled Business Process Change on Business Outcomes: Transformation of the Value Chain of Japan Airlines. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), pp. 13-40.
11. Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1992). Limits to Interfirm Coordination through IT. Journal of Management Information Systems, 70(1), pp. 73-95.
12. Cox, B., & Ghoneim, S. (1996). Drivers and Barriers to Adopting EDI: A Sector Analysis of UK Industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 5(1), pp. 24-33.
13. CRITO (2002). Global E-Commerce Survey. Irvine, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine.
14. Crum, M., Premkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1996). An Assessment of Motor Carrier Adoption, Use, and Satisfaction with EDI. Transportation Journal, 35(4), pp. 44-57.
15. Damsgaard, J., & Truex, D. (2000). The Procrustean Bed of Standards: Binary relations and the limits of EDI standards. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(3), pp. 173-88.
16. Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. (1995). The Reengineering Revolution. New York: Harpers Collins.
17. Hart P., & Saunders, C. S. (1997). Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), pp. 23-42.
18. Henriksen, H. Z. (2002). Performance, Pressures, and Politics: Motivators for Adoption of Interorganzational Information Systems. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur. Also available at URL http://www.cbs.dk/staff/hzh/hzh_phd. pdf
19. Henriksen, H. Z., Andersen, K.V., & Pedersen, T. (2002). IS innovation: Adoption of B2B e-commerce. in Towards the Knowledge Society: eCommerce, eBusiness and eGovernment. Proceedings of the second IFIP conference on eCommerce, eBusiness, eGovernment (I3E 2002) (pp. 569-81). October 7-9. Lisbon, Portugal.
20. Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology. MIS Quarterly (December), pp. 465-85.
21. Keen, P. W. (1981). Information Systems and Organizational Change. Communications of the ACM, 24(1), pp. 24-33.
22. Kraemer, K. L., Dedrick, J., & Dunkle, D. (2002). E-Commerce: A Mile Wide and an Inch Deep. Irvine, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine. http://crito.uci.edu/publications/pdf/GIT/GEC/IndustrySector Snapshot.pdf (last access May 27, 2003)
23. Krcmar, H., Bjørn-Andersen, N., & O'Callaghan, R. (1995). EDI in Europe: How it Works in Practice. New York: Wiley.
24. Lai, V. S., & Guynes, J. L. (1997). An Assessment of the Influence of Organizational Characteristics of Information Technology Adoption Decision: A Discriminative Approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(2), pp. 146-57.
25. Lange, C. (2002). Customer Relationship Management (eCRM). Proceedings of the second IFIP conference on eCommerce, eBusiness, eGovernment (I3E 2002) (pp. 131-44). October 7-9. Lisbon, Portugal.
26. Lee, H. G., Clark, T., & Tarn, K. Y. (1999). Can EDI Benefit Adopters? Information Systems Research, 10(2), pp. 186-95.
27. Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), pp. 430-44.
28. McFarlan, F. W., & Dailey, M. (2000). H. E. Butt Grocery Co.: The New Digital Strategy (A). Harvard Business School Case. 9-300-106.
29. Nakayama, M. (2000). E-Commerce and Firm Bargaining Power Shift in Grocery Marketing Channels: A Case of Wholesalers' Structured Document Exchanges. Journal of Information Technology, 15(3), pp. 195-210.
30. O'Callaghan, R., & Turner, J. A. (1995). Electronic Data Interchange - Concepts and Issues. In Krcmar, H., Bjørn-Andersen, N. & O'Callaghan, R. (eds.), EDI in Europe: How It Works in Practice (pp. 1-19). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
31. Porter, M. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 63-78.
32. Press, P. (1995). Kder i dansk detailhandel. Lyngby: Stockmangruppen.
33. Riggins, F. J. & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1994). Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), pp. 37-57.
34. Saunders, C. S., & Clark, S. (1992). EDI Adoption and Implementation: A Focus on Interorganizational Linkages. Information Resources Management Journal, 5(1), pp. 9-19.
35. th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 281-290).
36. Statistics Denmark. (2002). IT in the Danish Companies. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark.
37. Supermarkedshåndbogen (2002). Lyngby: Stockmangruppen.
38. Thong, J. Y. L. (1999). An Integrated Model for Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), pp. 187-214.
39. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Process of Technological Innovation. Toronto: Lexington Books.