Designing and life cycle engineering-a systematic approach to designing

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture

Volumn 215, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 657-672

  Eder, W E ^a  

^a ROYAL MILITARY COLLEGE OF CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Design process; Designing; Systematic designing

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344288843     PISSN: 09544054     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/0954405011518593     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Graedel, T. E. Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment, 1998 (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).
2. Bush, S. A. and Sheldon, D. F. Whose cost is it anyway? In WDK 22: Proceedings of ICED 93, The Hague, 1993, pp. 1130-1135 (Heurista, Zürich).
3. Bush, S. A. and Sheldon, D. F. Whole life costing: a businesslike approach to product design. In WDK. 23: Proceedings of ICED 95, Prague, 1995 (Ed.V. Hubka), pp. 988-994 (Heurista, Zurich).
4. Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. Design Science: Introduction to the Needs, Scope and Organization of Engineering Design Knowledge, 1996 (Springer-Verlag, London).
5. Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. Theory of Technical Systems, 1988 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York).
6. Hubka, V. Theorie der Konstniktionsprozesse (Theory of Design Processes), 1976 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
7. Hubka, V. and Eder, W. E. Engineering Design, 1992 (Heurista, Zürich).
8. Hubka, V., Andreasen, M. M. and Eder, VV. E. Practical Studies in Systematic Design, 1988 (Butterworths, London).
9. Eder, W. E. (Ed.) WDK 24-EDC- Engineering Design and Creativity-Proceedings of Workshop EDC, 1996 (Heurista, Zurich).
10. Klaus, G. Kybernetik in Philosophischer Sicht (Cybernetics in Philosophical View), 4th edition, 1965 (Dietz Verlag, Berlin).
11. Ashby, W. R. An Introduction to Cybernetics, 1968 (Methuen University Paperbacks, London).
12. Züst, R., Matt, D., Geisinger, D. and Winkler, R. A change of paradigm for planning life-cycle optimized and innovative products. In WDK 26: Proceedings of ICED 99, Munich, 1999, pp. 1081-1084 (Heurista, Zürich).
13. Züst, R. Systems engineering-a methodology for life cycle engineering in interdisciplinary teams. In WDK 25: Proceedings of ICED 97, Tampere, 1997, pp. 329-336 (Heurista, Zürich).
14. Fahl, G. and Beitz, W. Konstruktionslehre, 3rd edition, 1993 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg); Engineering Design (Eds K. M. Wallace, L. Blessing and F. Bauert), 2nd edition, 1955 (Springer-Verlag, London).
15. Joncs, J. Cli. Design Methods-Seeds of Human Futures, 2nd edition, 1980 (John Wiley, New York).
16. Cross, N. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 2nd edition, 1994 (John Wiley, London).
17. Birmingham, R., Cleland, G., Driver, R. and Maffin, D. Understanding Engineering Design, 1997 (Prentice-Hall, London).
18. Suh, N. P. Principles of Design, 1989 (University Press, Oxford).
19. Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, 1983 (Basic Books, New York).
20. Feilden, G. B. R. Engineering Design, Report of Royal Commission, 1963 (HMSO, London).
21. Eder, W. E. Methode QFD-Bindeglied zwischen Produktplanung und Konstruktion (Method QFD-Connective link between product planning and design). In Konstruktion, February 1995, Vol. 47, Nos 1/2, pp. 1-9 (SpringerVerlag, Berlin).
22. Cross, N. Engineering Design Methods: Strategics for Product Design, 2nd edition, 1994 (John Wiley, Chichester).
23. Bossert, J. L. Quality Function Deployment, 1990 (Marcel Dekker, New York).
24. Hauser, J. R. and Clausing, D. The house of quality. Harv. Business Rev., May-June 1988, 63-73.
25. Sullivan, L. P. Quality function deployment. Quality Prog., June 1986, 39-51.
26. Hofmeister, K. R. Quality function deployment: market success through customer-driven products. In Food Product
27. Development From Concept to the Marketplace (Eds E. Graf and I. S. Saguy), 1990, pp. 189-210 (ASI Press, Dearborn, Michigan).
28. Müller, J. Akzeptanzbarrieren als berechtigte und ernst zu nehmende Notwehr kreativer Konstrukteure-nicht immer nur böser Wille, Denkträgheit oder alter Zopf (Acceptance barriers as justified and serious defence reaction of creative designers-not always ill will, thinking inertia or old hat). In WDK 20: Proceedings of ICED 91, Zürich (Ed. V. Hubka), 1991, pp. 769-776 (Heurista, Zurich); also Acceptance barriers as justified and serious defence reaction of creative designers-not always only ill will, thinking inertia or old hat. In WDK 24-EDC-Engineering Design and Creativity-Proceedings of Workshop EDC (Ed. \V. E. Eder), 1996, pp. 79-84 (Heurista, Zurich).
29. Müller, J. Akzeptanzprobleme in der Industrie, ihre Ursachen und Wege zu ihrer Überwindung (Acceptability problems in industry, their causes and ways to overcome them). In Psychologische und Pädagogische Fragen beim Methodischen Konstruieren-Ladenburger Diskurs (Ed. G. Pahl), 1994, pp. 247-266 (Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne).
30. Eder, W. E. Acceptance barriers-why are design methods not accepted. In Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Design in Engineering Education Division (Session 2225), Charlotte, North Carolina, June 1999 (ASEE, Washington, DC).
31. Koen, B. V. Definition of the Engineering Method, 1985 (ASEE, Washington, DC).