MR coronary angiography and late-enhancement myocardial MR in children who underwent arterial switch surgery for transposition of great arteries

Radiology

Volumn 234, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 542-547

  Taylor, Andrew M ^a,b,c   Dymarkowski, Steven ^a   Hamaekers, Pascal ^a   Razavi, Reza ^c   Gewillig, Marc ^a   Mertens, Luc ^a   Bogaert, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTERY SURGERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; GREAT VESSELS TRANSPOSITION; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HEART; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSPOSITION OF GREAT VESSELS;

EID: 12344284894     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342032059     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jatene AD, Fontes VF, Paulista PP, et al. Anatomic correction of transposition of the great vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 72:364-370.
2. Prêtre R, Tamisier D, Bonhoeffer P, et al. Results of the arterial switch operation in neonates with transposed great arteries. Lancet 2001; 357:1826-1830.
3. Losay J, Touchot A, Serraf A, et al. Late outcome after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 2001; 104(suppl I):I121-I126.
4. Tanel RE, Wernovsky G, Landzberg MJ, Perry SB, Burke RP. Coronary artery abnormalities detected at cardiac catheterization following the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:153-157.
5. Bonnet D, Bonhoeffer P, Piéchaud JF, et al. Long-term fate of the coronary arteries after the arterial switch operation in newborns with transposition of the great arteries. Heart 1996; 76:274-229.
6. Bonhoeffer P, Bonnet D, Piéchaud JF, et al. Coronary artery obstruction after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries in newborns. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:202-206.
7. Faulkner K, Love HG, Sweeney JK, Bardsley RA. Radiation doses and somatic risk to patients during cardiac radiological procedures. Br J Radiol 1986; 59:359-363.
8. NRPB. Guidelines on patient dose to promote the optimisation of protection for diagnostic medical exposures. Vol 10, no. 1. London, England: NRPB, 1999.
9. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Bronzwaer JG, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries: a new gold standard for delineating the proximal course? Circulation 1995; 92:3163-3171.
10. McConnell MV, Ganz P, Selwyn AP, Li W, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Identification of anomalous coronary arteries and their anatomic course by magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Circulation 1995; 92: 3158-3162.
11. Taylor AM, Thorne SA, Rubens MB, et al. Coronary artery imaging in grown up congenital heart disease: complementary role of magnetic resonance and x-ray coronary angiography. Circulation 2000; 101:1670-1678.
12. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ. Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. Radiology 1999; 212: 579-587.
13. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1863-1869.
14. Botnar RM, Stuber M, Danias PG, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ. Improved coronary artery definition with T2-weighted, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary MRA. Circulation 1999; 99:3139-3148.
15. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. Cardiac real-time imaging using SENSE: SENSitivity Encoding scheme. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:177-184.
16. Etienne A, Botnar RM, Van Muiswinkel AM, Boesiger P, Manning WJ, Stuber M. "Soap-bubble" visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48:658-666.
17. DuBois D, DuBois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916; 17:863-871.
18. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2:358-367.
19. Kurotobi S, Nagai T, Kawakami N, Sano T. Coronary diameter in normal infants, children and patients with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Int 2002; 44:1-4.
20. Lorenz CH. The range of normal values of cardiovascular structures in infants, children, and adolescents measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21: 37-46.
21. Helbing WA, Niezen RA, Le Cessie S, van der Geest RJ, Ottenkamp J, de Roos A. Right ventricular diastolic function in children with pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy or Fallot: volumetric evaluation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1827-1835.
22. Liu YL, Riederer SJ, Rossman PJ, Grimm RC, Debbins JP, Ehman RL. A monitoring, feedback, and triggering system for reproducible breath-hold MR imaging. Magn Keson Med 1993; 30:507-511.
23. Taylor AM, Keegan J, Jhooti P, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. Differences between normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease for three different MR coronary angiography respiratory suppression techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:786-793.
24. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MR1 delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100:1992-2002.
25. Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR, Mata JF, French BA. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001; 104:2838-2842.
26. Bogaert J, Goldstein M, Tannouri F, Golzarian J, Dymarkowski S. Late myocardial enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:981-985.
27. McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, et al. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2003; 108:54-59.
28. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1445-1453.
29. Ebels T, Meuzelaar K, Huet R. Neonatal arterial switch operation complicated by intramural left coronary artery and treated by left internal mammary bypass graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 97:473-475.
30. Rheuban K, Kron IL, Bulatovic A. Internal mammary artery bypass after the arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50: 125-126.
31. Hausdorf G, Kampmann C, Schneider M. Coronary angioplasty for coronary stenosis after the arterial switch procedure. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:621-623.
32. Yates RW, Marsden PK, Badawi RD, et al. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion using positron emission tomography in infants following a neonatal artenal switch operation. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21:111-118.
33. Hauser M, Bengel FM, Kühn A, et al. Myocardial blood flow and flow reserve after coronary reimplantation in patients after arterial switch and Ross operation. Circulation 2001; 103:1875-1880.
34. Rickers C, Sasse K, Buchert R, et al. Myocardial viability assessed by positron emission tomography in infants and children after arterial switch operation and suspected infarction. J Am Colt Cardiol 2000; 36:1676-1683.