Correlation between sentences recognition thresholds in quiet and tonal thresholds;Correlação entre limiares de reconhecimento de sentenças no silêncio e limiares tonais

Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 672-677

  Soncini, Fabiana ^a,d   Costa, Maristela J ^a,b   Tochetto De Oliveira, Tania M ^a,b   Lopes, Luis Felipe D ^a,c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^d UNIFESP/SP ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Audiology; Audiometry pure tone; Auditory perception; Hearing; Speech discrimination tests

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEATUSCOPY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PORTUGAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 12344282974     PISSN: 00347299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-72992003000500013     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Schochat E. Percepγπo da Fala. In: _ Processamento Auditivo. São Paulo: Lovise; 1996. cap. 1, p.15-42.
2. Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Improving the reability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18:43-52.
3. Bronkhorst AW, Plomp RA. Clinical test for the assessment of binaural speech perception in noise. Audiology 1990; 29:275-85.
4. Nilsson MJ, Soli SD, Sullivan J. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am feb 1994; 95(2):1085-99.
5. Nilsson MJ, Soli SD, Sumida A. Development of norms and percent intelligibility functions for the hint. House Ear Institute feb 1995; 1-9.
6. Costa MJ. Lista de sentenças em português: apresentação & estratégias de aplicação na audiologia. Santa Maria: Pallotti; 1998. 44p.
7. rd. ed. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1970. cap. 9, p. 253-79.
8. Cser PL, Costa MJ, Cser MJS, Fukuda Y. Reconhecimento de sentenγas no silêncio e no ruído em indivíduos portadores de perda auditiva induzida pelo ruído. Rev Bras ORL jul./ago 2000; 66(4):362-70.
9. Costa MJ. Comunicação Pessoal no Serviço de Atendimento Fonoaudiolgico (SAF) da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) abr. 2002.
10. Levitt H, Rabiner LR. Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing. J Acoust Soc Am May 1967; 42(3):609-12.
11. Soldera CLC. Limiar de reconhecimento de sentenças no silêncio e no ruído: aspectos que podem influenciar estas medida. 2001. Monografia (Especialização em Fonoaudiologia) Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Santa Maria; 2001. 53p.
12. Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aid. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63:533-49.
13. Smoorenburg GF. Speech reception in quiet and in noise conditions by individuals with noise - induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am jan 1992; 91(1):421-437.
14. Hughson W, Thompson E. Correlation of hearing acuity for speech with discrete frequency audiograms. Arch Otolaryngol 1942; 36:526-40.
15. Carhart M. Monitored live-voice as a test of auditory acuity. J Acoust Soc Am 1946; 17:338-49.
16. Fletcher H. A method of calculating hearing loss for speech from the audiogram. Acta Otolaringol Suppl 1950; 90:26-37.
17. Duquesnoy AJ. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1983 oct; 74(4):1136-44.
18. Cooper JC, Cutts BP. Speech discrimination in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1971 jun; 14(2):332-7.
19. Festen JM, Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990 oct; 88(4):1725-36.