A method for calculation of dose per unit concentration values for aquatic biota

Journal of Radiological Protection

Volumn 24, Issue 4 A, 2004, Pages

  Vives i Batlle, J ^a   Jones, S R ^a   Gomez Ros J M ^b  

^a Westlakes Scientific Consulting Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b CIEMAT   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ECOSYSTEMS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PLANTS (BOTANY); RADIATION EFFECTS; RADIOISOTOPES; SPREADSHEETS;

AQUATIC BIOTA; ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT; ELLIPSOIDS; ORGANISMS;

DOSIMETRY;

RADIOISOTOPE;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; ENERGY ABSORPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COMMUNITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ABSORPTION;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BIRDS; CRUSTACEA; FISHES; MAMMALS; MARINE BIOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLLUSCA; PLANKTON; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOBIOLOGY; RADIOISOTOPES;

EID: 12344279872     PISSN: 09524746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/24/4A/002     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brown J, Gomez-Ros J-M, Jones S R, Pröhl G, Taranenko V, Thørring H, Vives i Batlle J and Woodhead D 2003 Dosimetric: models and data for assessing radiation exposures to biota FASSET Deliverable 3 Report for the EC 5th Framework Programme Contract FIGE-CT-2000-00102, ed G Pröhl (available for download from http://www.fasset.org)
2. Berger M J 1968 Energy deposition in water by photons from point isotropic sources J. Nucl. Med. 9 15-25
3. Berger M J 1971 Distribution of absorbed doses around point sources of electrons and beta particles in water and other media J. Nucl. Med. 12 5-23
4. Copplestone D, Bielby S, Jones S R, Patton D, Daniel P and Gize I 2001 Impact assessment of ionising radiation on wildlife R& D Publication 128 (Bristol: Environment Agency)
5. ICRP 1983 Radionuclide transformations - energy and intensity of transmissions ICRP Publication 38 (Ann. ICRP 11-3) (Oxford: Pergamon)
6. Fossett N G, Byrne B J, Kelley S J, Tucker A B, Arbour-Reily P and Lee W R 1994 The influence of large deletions on the mutation frequency induced by tritiated water and X-radiation in male Drosophila melanogaster post-meiotic germ cells Mutat. Res. 307 213-22
7. Johnson J R, Myers D K, Jackson J S, Dunford D W, Gragtmans N J, Wyatt H M, Jones A R and Percy D H 1995 Relative biological effectiveness of tritium for induction of myeloid leukemia in CBA/H mice Radiat. Res. 144 82-9
8. 3H in water Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 46 195-200
9. Straume T and Carsten A L 1993 Tritium radiobiology and relative biological effectiveness Health Phys. 65 657-72
10. Tanaka K, Sawada S and Kamada N 1994 Relative biological effectiveness and dose rate effect of tritiated water on chromosomes in human lymphocytes and bone marrow cells Mutat. Res. Lett. 323 53-61
11. Copplestone D, Wood M, Bielby S, Jones S R, Vives J and Beresford N A 2003 Habitats regulations for Stage 3 assessments: radioactive substances authorisations R&D Technical Report P3-101/SP1A (Bristol: Environment Agency) p 104
12. ICRU 1992 Report 56. Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues (Bethesda, MD: ICRU)
13. ICRP 1996 Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides. Part 5. Compilation of ingestion and inhalation dose coefficients ICRP Publication 72 (Ann. ICRP) (Oxford: Pergamon)
14. Simmonds J R, Lawson G and Mayall A 1995 Radiation Protection 72: Methodology for assessing the radiological consequences of routine releases to the environment Report EUR 15760 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EC)