Stability and electronic structure of the complex K2PtCl 6-structure hydrides DMH6 (D=Mg, Ca, Sr; M=Fe, Ru, Os)

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 19, 2004, Pages 1-11

  Halilov, S V ^a,b   Singh, D J ^a,e   Gupta, M ^c   Gupta, R ^d  

^a NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^d DIF   (France)

^e OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BERYLLIUM; CALCIUM; CHLORIDE; IRON; LEAD; MAGNESIUM; OSMIUM; PLATINUM; POTASSIUM; RUTHENIUM; STRONTIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPOSITION; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRON; MAGNETISM; PHONON; POLARIZATION;

EID: 12344270819     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195117     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. R. O. Moyer, Jr., C. Stanitski, J. Tanaka, M. I. Kay, and B. Kleinberg, J. Solid State Chem. 3, 541 (1971).
2. J.-J. Didisheim, P. Zolliker, K. Yvon, P. Fischer, J. Schefer, M. Gubbelmann, and A. F. Williams, Inorg. Chem. 23, 1953 (1984).
3. M. Kritikos, D. Noreus, B. Bogdanovic, and U. Wilczok, J. Less-Common Met. 161, 337 (1990).
4. B. Huang, F. Bonhomme, P. Selvam, K. Yvon, and P. Fischer, J. Less-Common Met. 171, 301 (1991).
5. K. Yvon, Chimia 52, 613 (1998).
6. R. O. Moyer, Jr., R. Lindsay, and D. F. Storey, Z. Phys. Chem., Neue Folge 165, 83 (1989).
7. I. G. Konstanchuk, E. Yu. Ivanov, M. Pezat, B. Darriet, V. V. Boldyrev, and P. Hagenmuller, J. Less-Common Met. 131, 181 (1987).
8. B. Bogdanovic, A. Reiser, K. Schlichte, B. Spliethoff, and B. Tesche, J. Alloys Compd. 345, 77 (2002).
9. G. J. Miller, H. Deng, and R. Hoffmann, Inorg. Chem. 33, 1330 (1994).
10. D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 53, 176 (1996).
11. E. Orgaz and M. Gupta, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 6697 (1993).
12. D. J. Singh, Planewaves Pseudopotentials and the LAPW Method (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994).
13. D. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 43, 6388 (1991).
14. S. F. Parker, K. P. J. Williams, M. Bortz, and K. Yvon, Inorg. Chem. 36, 5128 (1997).
15. L. F. Mattheiss, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1863 (1991).
16. 0 sphere.
17. A. Aguayo and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 69, 155103 (2004).
18. 8 manifold. However, this is not compatible with the electron count of Fe and Mg.
19. O. Gunnarsson, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 6, 587 (1976).
20. H. Yamada, J. Inoue, K. Terao, S. Kanda, and M. Shimizu, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 14, 1943 (1984).
21. I. I. Mazin and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 56, 2556 (1997).
22. D. C. Patton, D. V. Porezag, and M. R. Pederson, Phys. Rev. B 55, 7454 (1997).
23. E. Wicke and H. Brodowsky, in Hydrogen in Metals II, edited by G. Alefeld and J. Volkl (Springer, Berlin, 1978), pp. 73-155.
24. H.-J. Tao, K.-M. Ho, and X.-Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. B 34, 8394 (1986).
25. K. Miwa and A. Fukumoto, Phys. Rev. B 65, 155114 (2002).
26. M. Bortz, B. Bertheville, G. Bottger, and K. Yvon, J. Alloys Compd. 287, L4 (1999).
27. R. Yu and P. K. Lam, Phys. Rev. B 37, 8730 (1988).
28. A. F. Andresen, A. J. Maeland, and D. Slotfeldft-Ellingsen, J. Solid State Chem. 20, 93 (1977).
29. N. E. Brese, M. O'Keefe and R. B. von Dreele, J. Solid State Chem. 88, 571 (1990).
30. R. C. Weast, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Sec. D (CRC, New York, 1974).
31. H. Smithson, C. A. Marianetti, D. Morgan, A. Van der Ven, A. Predith, and G. Ceder, Phys. Rev. B 66, 144107 (2002).
32. C. Wolverton, V. Ozolins, and M. Asia, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144109 (2004).
33. 2; D. J. Singh, W. E. Pickett, and H. Krakauer, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11628 (1991). The good agreement with experiment for the formation energy of FeAl (which is on the borderline of magnetism) from ferromagnetic Fe and Al supports the conclusion that the error due to the LDA treatment of the magnetic energy of Fe is small.
34. R. E. Cohen, Nature (London) 358, 136 (1992).
35. D. J. Singh and L. L. Boyer, Ferroelectrics 136, 95 (1992).
36. 6.
37. T. Miyake, F. Aryasetiawan, H. Kino, and K. Terakura, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16491 (2000).
38. Z. Wu, R. E. Cohen, D. J. Singh, R. Gupta, and M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. B 69, 085104 (2004).
39. The trend with A-site cation is not surprising in an ionic picture. One can think of the formation energy in stages: first the formation of ions by atomization and ionization of the elements, and then formation of a lattice from the ions. The latter would favor smaller lattice parameters via the 1/r scaling of the Ewald energy (which is opposite to the calculated trends in the energies), but this is overcome by the large ionization and atomization energies. The sums of the experimental atomization, and first and second ionization energies for Be, Mg, Ca, and Sr are 2982, 2336, 1913, and 1778 kJ/mol, respectively; NIST.
40. S. Jonsson, K. Kaltenbach, and G. Petzow, Z. Metallkd. 73, 534 (1982).
41. R. Jesser and I. Vincze, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 6, 1567 (1976).
42. H. Samata, Y. Nagata, S. Morita, G. Tanaka, T. Mitsuhashi, S. Yashiro, and S. Abe, J. Alloys Compd. 302, 29 (2000).
43. P. Mohn and K. Schwarz, Physica B & C 130, 26 (1985).
44. D. J. Singh and M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. B 69, 132403 (2004).
45. J. Breuer, A. Grun, F. Sommer, and E. J. Mittemeijer, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 32, 913 (2001).
46. M. Fornari and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 63, 092101 (2001).
47. G. A. Samara and A. A. Giardini, Phys. Rev. A140, 954 (1965); G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 1, 3777 (1970).
48. G. A. Samara and A. A. Giardini, Phys. Rev. A140, 954 (1965); G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 1, 3777 (1970).
49. D. J. Singh and L. L. Boyer, Ferroelectrics 136, 95 (1992).