Species interactions with quackgrass and their effects on forage production

Crop Science

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 290-296

  Brenly Bultemeier, T L ^a   Barker, D J ^a   Sulc, R M ^a   Harrison, S K ^a   Regnier, E E ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DACTYLIS; DACTYLIS GLOMERATA; ELYMUS REPENS; ELYTRIGIA; POACEAE; TRIFOLIUM; TRIFOLIUM REPENS;

EID: 12344265851     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anten, N., and T. Hirose. 1999. Interspecific differences in aboveground growth patterns result in spatial and temporal partitioning of light among species in tall-grass meadow. J. Ecol. 87:583-597.
2. Barker, D.J., R.M. Sulc, A. Deak, M.H. Hall, M.A. Sanderson, and T.L. Bultemeier. 2003. Performance of pastures with high and low species richness in northeast USA. Proc Am. For. Grassl. Congr. 12:172-176.
3. Brougham, R.W. 1970. Frequency and intensity of grazing and their effects on pasture production. Proc. N.Z. Grassl. Assoc. 32:137-144.
4. Bultemeier, T.L., D.J. Barker, R.M. Sulc, S.K. Harrison, and E.E. Regnier. 2002a. Species interactions with quackgrass and their effect on forage production. In Annual Meetings Abstracts [CD-ROM]. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
5. Bultemeier, T.L., D.J. Barker, R.M. Sulc, S.K. Harrison, and E.E. Regnier. 2002b. Quackgrass interactions and effects on forage species. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. Abstr. 199. [CD-ROM Computer File]. North Central Weed Sci. Soc., Champaign, IL.
6. Bultemeier, T.L., D.J. Barker, R.M. Sulc, S.K. Harrison, and E.E. Regnier. 2003. Quackgrass contribution to production of pasture mixtures under grazing. Proc. Am. For. Grassl. Congr. 12:135-139.
7. Carlassare, M., and H.D. Karsten. 2002. Species contribution to seasonal productivity of a mixed pasture under two sward grazing height regimes. Agron. J. 94:840-850.
8. Casler, M.D., and W.H. Goodwin. 1998. Agronomic performance of quackgrass and hybrid wheatgrass populations. Crop Sci. 38:1369-1377.
9. Christen, A.M., J.R. Seoane, and G.D. Leroux. 1990. The nutritive value for sheep of quackgrass and timothy hays harvested at two stages of growth. J. Anim. Sci. 68:3350-3359.
10. Connolly, J., P. Wayne, and F.A. Bazzaz. 2001. Inter-specific competition in plants: How well do current methods answer fundamental questions? Am. Nat. 157:107-125.
11. deWit, C.T. 1960. On competition. Versl. Landouwkd. Onderz. 66:1-82.
12. Greub, L.J., M. Collins, S.K. Carlson, and M.D. Casler. 1986. Relationship of morphological characteristics to forage quality in quackgrass. Crop Sci. 26:819-822.
13. Griffin, T., E. Giberson, and M. Wiedenhoeft. 2002. Yield response of long-term mixed grassland swards and nutrient cycling under different nutrient sources and management regimes. Grass Forage Sci. 57:268-278.
14. Hume, D.E. 1991. Effect of cutting on production and tillering in prairie grass compared with two ryegrass species. Ann. Bot. 67:533-541.
15. Malzer, G.L., and R.P. Schoper. 1984. Influence of time and rate of nitrogen application on yield and crude protein of three cool season grasses grown on organic soils. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:319-328.
16. Marten, G.C., and A.W. Hoven. 1980. Harvest schedule, persistence, yield and quality interactions among four perennial grasses. Agron. J. 72:378-387.
17. Reidy, M.E., and C.J. Swanton. 2001. Quackgrass. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/ english/crops/facts/ quackgrass.htm; verified 20 July 2004.
18. Sheaffer, C.C., D.L. Wyse, G.C. Marten, and P.H. Westra. 1990. The potential of quackgrass for forage production. J. Prod. Agric. 3:256-259.
19. Smith, D. 1973. Distribution of dry matter and chemical constituents among the plant parts of six temperate-origin forage grasses at early anthesis. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 317.
20. Tardiff, F.J., and G.D. Leroux. 1992. Response of three quackgrass biotypes to nitrogen fertilization. Agron. J. 84:366-370.
21. Thornton, B. 1996. Effects of severity of defoliation on root functioning in grasses. J. Range Manage. 49:443-447.