Surface hardness properties of resin-modified glass lonomer cements and polyacid-modified composite resins

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 42-49

  Bayindir, Yusuf Ziya ^a,b   Yildiz, Mehmet ^a,b  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Operative Dentistry ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Composite resin; Microhardness; Polyacid modified composite resin; Resin modified composite resin

Indexed keywords

ACID; GLASS FIBER; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; HARDNESS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 12344258920     PISSN: 15263711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-5-4-42     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Croll TP, Killian CM. Visible light-hardened glass-ionomer-resin cement restorations for primary teeth: new developments. Quintessence Int. 1992 Oct;23(10):679-82.
2. Christensen GJ. Glass ionomer-resin: a maturing concept. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 Jul;124(7):248-9.
3. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int. 1994 Sep;25(9):587-9. No abstract available.
4. McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials. 1998 Mar;19(6):521-7. Review.
5. Geurtsen W, Spahl W, Leyhausen G. Residual monomer/additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers. J Dent Res. 1998 Dec;77(12):2012-9.
6. Preston AJ, Agalamanyi EA, Higham SM, et. al. The recharge of esthetic dental restorative materials with fluoride in vitro-two years' results. Dent Mater. 2003 Jan;19(1):32-7.
7. Culbertson BM. Glass-ionomerdental restoratives. Prog Polim Sci. 2001; 26:577-604.
8. Crispin BJ. Contemporary Esthetic Dentistry: Practice Fundamentals. Glass ionomer restoratives. Tokyo, Chicago, Berlin, London; Quintessence publishing Co.: 1994: 57-76.
9. Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int. 1995 May;26(5):351-8.
10. Leinfelder KF. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991 Apr;122(4):65-70.
11. Watts DC, McNaughton V, Grant AA. The development of surface hardness in visible light-cured posterior composites. J Dent. 1986 Aug;14(4):169-74. No abstract available.
12. Bourke AM, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements: the setting reaction. J Dent. 1992 Apr;20(2):115-20.
13. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials. 1998 Mar;19(6):503-8. Review.
14. Louden JD, Roberts TA. Cure profiles of light cured dental composites by Raman spectroscopy. J Ram Spect. 1983; 14:365-370.
15. Asmussen, E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res. 1982 Dec;90(6):484-9.
16. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scand J Dent Res. 1982 Dec;90(6):490-6.
17. DeWald JP, Ferracane JL. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res. 1987 Mar;66(3):727-30.
18. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res. 1988 Jun;67(6):932-7.
19. Peutzfeldt A, Garcia-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent. 1997 Feb;10(1):15-7.
20. el-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1999 Jan-Feb;24(1):2-8.
21. Inoue K, Hayashi I. Residual monomer (Bis-GMA) of composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1982 Nov;9(6):493-7. No abstract available.
22. Sakaguchi RL, Peters MC, Nelson SR, et. al. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent. 1992 Jun;20(3):178-82.
23. Li Y, Swartz ML, Philips RW, et. al. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res. 1985 Dec;64(12):1396-401.
24. De Backer J, Dermaut L. Visible light sources and posterior visible light cured resins: a practical mixture. Quintessence Int. 1986 Oct;17(10):635-41. No abstract available.
25. Tsuruta S, Viohl J. Influence of storage humidity on hardness of light-cured glass polyalkenoate cements. Dent Mater J. 1996 Jun;15(1):51-7.
26. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, et. al. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1999 Jan;15(1):71-8.
27. Munack J, Haubert H, Dogan S, et. al. Effects of various storage media on surface hardness and structure of four polyacid-modified composite resins ("compomers"). Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Dec;5(4):254-9.
28. Friedl KH, Powers JM, Hiller KA. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent. 1995 Mar-Apr;20(2):74-80.
29. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et. al. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997 Apr;76(4):883-94.
30. Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation. J Esthet Dent. 1994;6(5):207-15. Review. No abstract available.