The professional development of teachers by means of the construction of collaborative thinking

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 241-252

  Martínez Ruiz, MarÍa A ^a   Sauleda Pareés, Narciso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344254713     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674589700200016     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Axelrod, R., 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation, New York:Basic Books.
2. Beltrán de Tena, R. Y., and RodrÍguez Diéguez, J. L., 1990. La evaluaciÓn. Didáctica-adaptaciÓn. El curriculum, 2:299–500.
3. Davis, G. A., and Thomas, M. A., 1992. Escuelas eficaces y profesores eficientes, Madrid:Ed. La muralla.
4. Day, C. W., 1990. “ The development of teachers' personal practical knowledge through school-based curriculum ”. In Insight into Teachers' Thinking and Practice, Edited by:Day, C., Pope, M., and Denicolo, P., London:Falmer Press.
5. Day, C. W., 1991. Roles and relationships in qualitative research on teachers' thinking:a reconsideration. Teaching & Teacher Education, 7:537–547.
6. Day, C. W., 1994. Le reflexion:una condicion necesaria pero no suficiente para el desarrollo profesional. Tossal. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigacion Educativa, 2:67–79.
7. Day, C. W., 1996. “ A general framework for research projects in in-service teacher education:the European context. Paper presented to the Sectorial meeting on Teacher Education ”. Europe:On-going and future research projects. Murcia. Spain.
8. Day, C. W., Hall, C., Gammage, P., and Coles, M., 1993. Leadership and Curriculum in the Primary School, London:Paul Chapman.
9. Elbaz, F., 1990. “ Knowledge and discourse:the evolution of research on teacher' thinking ”. In Insight into Teachers' Thinking and Practice, Edited by:Day, C., Pope, M., and Denicolo, P., London:Falmer Press.
10. Frank, S. A., 1995. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature, 337:520–522.
11. Glance, N. S., and Huberman, B. A., 1994. The dynamics of social dilemmas. Scientific American, 270:58–63.
12. Hargreaves, A., 1995. “ Towards a social geography of teacher education ”. In Teacher Education in Industrialized Nations, Edited by:Shimahara, N. K., and Holowinsky, I. Z., New York:Garland.
13. Holmes Group. 1986. Tomorrow's Teachers, East Lansing:Holmes Group.
14. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrow's Schools, East Lansing:Holmes Group.
15. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrow's School of Education, East Lansing:Holmes Group.
16. Labaree, D. F., and Pallas, A. M., 1996a. Dire straits:the narrow vision of the Holmes Group. Educational Researcher, 25:25–28.
17. Labaree, D. F., and Pallas, A. M., 1996b. Rejoinder:the Holmes Group's mystifying response. Educational Researcher, 25:31–32.
18. Lieberman, A., ed. 1995. “ Expanding the leadership team ”. In Educational Leadership, New York:Garland.
19. Lortie, D., 1975. Schoolteacher, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
20. Murray, F. B., 1996. The narrow and broad readings of tomorrow's schools of education. Educational Researcher, 25 (5):28–31.
21. Nowak, M., and Sigmund, K., 1993. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Nature, 364:56–58.
22. Nowak, M., May, R. M., and Sigmund, K., 1995. La aritmética de la ayuda mutua. InvestigaciÓn y ciencia, 227:42–48.
23. Wasser, J. D., and Bresler, L., 1996. Working in the interpretative zone:conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research terms. Educational Research, 25 (5):5–15.