Analysis of a database of pesticide residues on plants for wildlife risk assessment

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 360-371

  Baril, Alain ^a   Whiteside, Mélanie ^a   Boutin, Céline ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Nomogram; Pesticides; Plant residue; Risk assessment; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

CROPS; CULTIVATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FRUITS; MORPHOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

LINEAR REGRESSION; PLANT MORPHOLOGY; RESIDUE FROM A UNIT DOSAGE (RUD); WILDLIFE;

PESTICIDES;

PESTICIDE RESIDUE;

DATABASE; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

APPLICATION RATE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CROP; CULTIVATION METHOD; DATA BASE; DIET; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FRUIT SIZE; GRAIN; HORTICULTURE; MEASUREMENT; NOMOGRAM; NONHUMAN; PESTICIDE SPRAYING; PLANT LEAF; PLANT MORPHOLOGY; PLANT RESIDUE; POD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; RESIDUE FROM A UNIT DOSAGE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TECHNIQUE; VARIANCE; WILDLIFE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FRUIT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; PLANTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANATOMY; BIOCIDES; CULTIVATION; DATA BASES; FARM CROPS; FRUITS; PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 12344250872     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/03-656.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Urban DJ, Cook NJ. 1986. Standard evaluation procedure: Ecological risk assessment. EPA 540/9-95-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
2. Hoerger FD, Kenaga EE. 1972. Pesticide residues on plants: Correlation of representative data as a basis for estimation of their magnitude in the environment. In Coulston F, Korte F, eds, Environmental Quality, Vol 1. Academic, New York, NY, USA, pp 9-28.
3. Fletcher JS, Nellessen JE, Pfleeger TG. 1994. Literature review and evaluation of the EPA nomogram, an instrument for estimating pesticide residues on plants. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:1383-1391.
4. Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la protection des plantes/European Plant Protection Organization. 1993. Decision-making scheme for the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products. OEPP/EPPO Bull 24:1-87.
5. Fite E. 1994. The Environmental Protection Agency's Avian Pesticide Assessment Model. In Kendall RJ, Latcher TE, eds, Wildlife Toxicology and Population Modeling: Integrated Studies of Agroecosystems. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 519-530.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Probabilistic models and methodologies: Advancing the ecological risk assessment process in the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs. SAP Report 2001-06. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel, Washington, DC.
7. Solomon KR, Giesy JP, Kendall RJ, Best LB, Coats JR, Dixon KR, Hooper MJ, Kenaga EE, McMurry ST. 2001. Chlorpyrifos: Ecotoxicological risk assessment for birds and mammals in corn agroecosystems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:497-632.
8. Cleveland CB, Mayes MA, Cryer SA. 2002. An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton. Pest Manag Sci 58:70-84.
9. Corson MS, Mora MA, Grant WE. 1998. Simulating cholinesterase inhibition in birds caused by dietary insecticide exposure. Ecol Model 105:299-323.
10. Milliam JR, Craig-Veit CB, Batchelder ME, Viant MR, Herbeck TM, Woods LW. 2002. An avian bioassay for environmental estrogens: The growth response of zebra finch (Taenlopygia guttata) chick oviduct to oral estrogens. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2662-2668.
11. Quaglino AE, Craig-Veit CB, Viant MR, Erichsen AL, Fry DM, Milliam JR. 2002. Oral estrogen masculinizes female zebra finch song system. Horm Behav 41:236-241.
12. Bennett RS, Edge WD, Griffis WL, Matz AC, Wolff JO, Ganio LM. 1994. Temporal and spatial distribution of azinphos-methyl applied to alfalfa. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 27:534-540.
13. Schauber EM, Edge WD, Wolff JO. 1995. Influence of vegetation height on the distribution and persistence of insecticide residues on alfalfa and soil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29:449-454.
14. Pfleeger TG, Fong A, Hayes R, Ratsch H, Wickliff C. 1996. Field evaluation of the EPA (Kenaga) nomogram, a method for estimating wildlife exposure to pesticide residues on plants. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:535-543.
15. Edge WD, Schauber EM. 2000. Factors affecting risk assessment of small mammals to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2735-2741.
16. Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods. 1999. Terrestrial ECOFRAM terrestrial draft report. Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
17. Wauchope RD, Street JE. 1987. Fate of a water-soluble herbicide spray on foliage. Part I. Spray efficiency: Measurement of initial deposition and absorption. Pestic Sci 19:243-263.
18. Southwick LM, Boethel DJ, Willis GH, Rester DC, Yanes J Jr, Troxclair NN Jr, Sparks AN Jr. 1986. Deposits and persistence of permethrin ULV and EC applications on soybean leaves. J Econ Entomol 79:202-207.
19. Bailey LH: 1968. Manual of Cultivated Plants. MacMillan, New York, NY, USA.
20. Decoteau DR. 2000. Vegetable Crops. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
21. Dunn DJ. 1964. Multiple contrasts using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241-252.
22. Statsoft. 2000. Statistica for Windows. Tulsa, OK, USA.
23. Rider AR, Dickey EC. 1982. Field evaluation of calibration accuracy for pesticide application equipment. Trans ASAE 25:258-260.
24. Hofman V, Hauck D. 1983. Sprayer check in North Dakota. Paper NCR-83-404. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.