Transient response functions for conjunctive water management in the Snake River Plain, Idaho

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1469-1482

  Cosgrove, Donna M ^a   Johnson, Gary S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjunctive water use; Ground water model; Stream aquifer interaction; Water policy regulation decision making; Water resources planning and management

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; STREAM FLOW; STRESSES; SURFACE WATER RESOURCES;

CONJUCTIVE MANAGEMENT; STREAM DEPLETION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

BASIN MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PLANNING;

IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; SNAKE RIVER PLAIN; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

SERPENTES;

EID: 12244306981     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01599.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allen, R.G. and C.E. Brockway, 1983. Estimating Consumptive Irrigation Requirements for Crops in Idaho. Idaho Water and Energy Resources Research Institute, Moscow, Idaho, 182 pp.
2. Cosgrove, D.M., 2001. Response Functions for the Conjunctive Management of Water in the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho. PhD Dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.
3. Cosgrove, D.M., G.S. Johnson, S. Laney, and J. Lindgren, 1999. Description of the IDWR/UI Snake River Plain Aquifer Model. Idaho Water Resources Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 120 pp.
4. Ejaz, M.S. and R.C. Peralta, 1995. Maximizing Conjunctive Use of Surface and Ground Water Under Surface Water Quality Constraints. Advances in Water Resources 18(2)67-75.
5. Frederick, D.B. and G.S. Johnson, 1996. Estimation of Hydraulic Properties and Development of a Layered Conceptual Model for the Snake River Plain Aquifer at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho. Idaho Water Resources Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 80 pp.
6. Fredericks, J.W. and J.W. Labadie, 1995. Decision Support System for Conjunctive Stream-Aquifer Management. Colorado Water Resources Research Institute Open File Report No. 10, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colorado, 124 pp.
7. Garabedian, S.P., 1992. Hydrology and Digital Simulation of the Regional Aquifer System, Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1408-F, 102 pp.
8. Glover, R.E., 1968. The Pumped Well. Colorado State University Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 100, Ft. Collins, Colorado, 23 pp.
9. Goode, D.J. and C.A. Appel, 1992. Finite-Difference Inter-Block Transmissivity for Unconfined Aquifers and for Aquifers Having Smoothly Varying Transmissivity. U.S. Geological Survey WaterResources Investigations Report 92-4124, 79 pp.
10. Hubbell, J.M., C.W. Bishop, G.S. Johnson, and J.G. Lucas, 1997. Numerical Ground-Water Flow Modeling of the Snake River Plain Aquifer Using the Superposition Technique. Ground Water 35(1):59-66.
11. IDWR (Idaho Department of Water Resources), 1997. Upper Snake River Basin Study. Idaho Department of Water Resources, Boise, Idaho, 85 pp.
12. Illangasekare, T. and H.J. Morel Seytoux, 1982. Stream-Aquifer Influence Coefficients as Tools for Simulation Management. Water Resources Research 18(1):168-176.
13. Jenkins, C.T., 1968. Computation of Rate and Volume of Stream Depletion by Wells. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Chapter D1, Book 4, 17 pp.
14. Johnson, G.S., C.W. Bishop, J.M. Hubbell, and J.G. Lucas, 1993. Simulation of Impacts of Snake River Plain Aquifer Water Use on Flow in the Snake River. Idaho Water Resources Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 56 pp.
15. Kjelstrom, L.C., 1995. Streamflow Gains and Losses in the Snake River and Ground-Water Budgets for the Snake River Plain, Idaho and Eastern Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1408-C, 47 pp.
16. Maddock III, T., 1972, Algebraic Technological Functions From a Simulation Model. Water Resources Research 8(1):129-134.
17. Maddock III, T. and L.J. Lacher, 1991. MODRSP: A Program to Calculate Drawdown, Velocity, Storage, and Capture Response Functions for Multi-Aquifer Systems. Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, HWR 91-020.
18. McDonald, M.G. and A.W. Harbaugh, 1988. A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1.
19. Morel-Seytoux, H.J. and C.J. Daly, 1975. A Discrete Kernel Generator for Stream-Aquifer Studies. Water Resources Research 11(2):253-260.
20. Reilly, T.E., O.L. Franke, and G.D. Bennett, 1987. The Principle of Superposition and Its Application in Ground-Water Hydraulics. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 3, Chapter B6, 28 pp.
21. Robertson, J.B., 1974. Digital Modeling of Radioactive and Chemical Waste Transport in the Snake River Plain Aquifer at the National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 74-1089, 41 pp.
22. Spinazola, J.M., 1994. Geohydrology and Simulation of Flow and Water Levels in the Mud Lake Area of the Eastern Snake River Plain, Eastern Idaho. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4227, Boise, Idaho, 78 pp.
23. Whitehead, R.L., 1992. Geohydrologic Framework of the Snake River Plain Regional Aquifer System, Idaho and Eastern Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1408-B, 32 pp.