Factors influencing the surgical process during shoulder joint replacement: Time-action analysis of five different prostheses and three different approaches

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Minekus, Joanne P J ^a   Valstar, Edward R ^a,b   Rozing, Piet M ^b   De Vos, Maarten J ^c   Diercks, Ron L ^d   Willems, W Jaap ^e   Dankelman, Jenny ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c SINT MAARTENSKLINIEK   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Guiding instruments; Joint replacement; Shoulder prosthesis; Time action analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT PROSTHESIS; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MEDICAL ERRORS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 12244283723     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Magermans DJ, Smits NCMA, Chadwick EKJ et al: Discriminating factors for functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty; a literature review. Acta Orthop Belg, 2003; 69(2): 127-36
2. Skirving AP: Total shoulder arthroplasty - current problems and possible solutions. J Orthop Sci, 1999; 4(1): 42-53
3. Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK: A guide to task analysis. 1992; 41-80
4. Swain AD, Guttmann HE: Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Albuquerque, 1983
5. Cuschieri A: Human reliability assessment in surgical performance and clinical outcome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2000; 82: 83-87
6. den Boer KT, Straatsburg IH, Schellinger AV et al: Quantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: a time-motion analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 1999; 9(5): 389-95
7. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A: Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery-a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon, 1998; 29(6): 409-14
8. Sjoerdsma W: Surgeons at work, time and actions analysis of the laparoscopic surgical process. 1998; PhD thesis of the Delft University of Technology, Delft
9. Treasure T, Valencia O, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Gallivan S: Surgical performance measurement. Health Care Management Science, 2002; 5: 243-48
10. Minekus JPJ, Rozing PM, Valstar E, Dankelman J: Evaluation of humeral head replacements using time-action analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003; 12: 152-57
11. Redfern TR, Wallace WA, Beddow FH: Clavicular osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 1989; 13(1): 61-63
12. Rozing PM, Brand R: Rotator cuff repair during shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty, 1998; 13(3): 311-19
13. Dunbar MJ, Gross M: Critical steps in total knee arthroplasty; a method of analysing operative procedures. Int Orthop, 1995; 19: 265-68
14. Kreder HJ, Deyo RA, Koepsell T et al: Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington. J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 1997; 79(4): 485-94
15. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L: The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001; 83(1): 45-49
16. Committee on quality of health care in America, To err is human; Building a safer health system. National academy press, Washington, 1999