The implementation of a local primary care incentive scheme: Medical vs management priorities

Clinical Governance: An International Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 19-25

  Mahmood, Kashifa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

General practice; Management; Policy; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; INTERVIEW; MANAGER; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 12244259325     PISSN: 14777274     EISSN: 17586038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14777270310459931     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Coburn, D., Rapport, S. and Bogeault, I. (1997), “Decline vs retention of medical power through restratification: an examination of the Ontario case”, Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
2. Freidson, E. (1994), Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
3. Harrison, S. and Dowswell, G. (2002), “Autonomy and bureaucratic accountability in primary care: what English general practitioners say”, Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 208-26.