Sportsfish consumption surveys: A risk assessment practitioner's wish list

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1213-1225

  Strauss, Harlee ^a  

^a H Strauss Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult; Children; Exposure assessment; Fish consumption; Ingestion rate

Indexed keywords

EID: 12244251039     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030490887267     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Balcom NC, Capacchione CM, and Hirsch DW. 1999. Quantification of Fish and Seafood Consumption Rates for Connecticut. Unpublished report, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Long Island Sound Programs, Hartford, CT, USA
2. Beehler GP, Weiner JM, McCann SE, et al. 2002. Identification of sport fish consumption patterns in families of recreational anglers through factor analysis. Environ Res Section A 89:19-28
3. Bevelhimer MS, Beauchamp JJ, Simple BE, et al. 1997. Estimation of Whole-Fish Contaminant Concentrations from Fish Fillet Data. ES/ER/TM-202. Report Prepared by Risk Assessment Program, Oak Ridge National Lab. for the Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy. Oak Ridge, TN, USA
4. Burger J. 2000. Consumption advisories and compliance: The fishing public and the deamplification of risk. J Environ Plan Manage 43:471-88
5. Burger J, Stevens WL Jr, Boring CS, et al. 1999. Factors in exposure assessment: Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in fishing and consumption of fish caught along the Savannah River. Risk Anal 19:427-38
6. Burger J, Gaines KF, Boring CS, et al. 2004. Effects of cooking on radiocesium in fish from the Savannah River: Exposure differences for the public. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46:231-5
7. Connelly NA, Knuth BA, and Bisogni CA. 1992. Effects of the Health Advisory and Advisory Changes on Fishing Habits and Fish Consumption in New York Sport Fisheries. Report No. 92-9. Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
8. CRITFC (Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission). 1994. A Fish Consumption Survey of the Umatilla, Nez Perce, Yakama, and Warm Springs Tribes of the Columbia River Basin, Technical Report 94-3, Portland, OR, USA. Available at http://www.critfc.org/tech/94-3report.html
9. Davidson PW, Myers GJ, and Weiss, B. 2004. Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics 113:1023-29
10. Ebert ES. 1996. Fish consumption and human health: Developing partnerships between risk assessors and resource managers. Am Fish Soc Symp 16:261-70
11. Ebert ES, Harrington NW, Boyle KJ, et al. 1993. Estimating consumption of freshwater fish among Maine anglers. N Am J Fish Manage 13:737-45
12. Ebert ES, Su SH, Barry TJ, et al. 1996. Estimated rates of fish consumption by anglers participating in the Connecticut Housatonic river creel survey. N Am J Fish Manage 16:81-9
13. Finley BL, Iannuzzi TJ, Wilson ND, et al. 2003. The Passaic River creel/angler survey: Expert panel review, findings, and recommendations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:829-55
14. Harris SG and Harper BL. 1997. A Native American exposure scenario. Risk Anal 17:789-95
15. Knuth BA, Connelly NA, and Matthews BE. 1998. Children's Fishing and Fish Consumption Patterns. HDRU Series 98-3. Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
16. Knuth BA, Connelly NA, Sheeshka J, et al. 2003. Weighing health benefit and health risk information when consuming sport-caught fish. Risk Anal 23:1185-97
17. Marien K. 2002. The importance of weight-normalized exposure data when issuing fish advisories for protection of public health. Environ Health Perspect 110:671-7
18. Morgan JN, Berry MR, and Graves RL. 1997. Effects of commonly used cooking practices on total mercury concentration in fish and their impact on exposure assessments. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 7:119-33
19. Moya J, Garrahan KG, Poston TM, et al. 1998. Effects of cooking on levels of PCBs in the fillets of Winter Flounder. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 60:845-51
20. NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA
21. Price PS, Su SH, and Gray MN. 1994. The effect of sampling bias on estimates of angler consumption rates in creel surveys. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 4:355-72
22. Schantz SL, Widholm JJ, Rice DC. 2003. Effects of PCB exposure on neuropsychological function in children. Environ Health Perspect. 111:357-76
23. Sherer RA and Price PS. 1993. The effect of cooking processes on PCB Levels in Edible Fish Tissue. Quality Assurance 2:396-407
24. TERA (Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment). 1999. Comparative Dietary Risks: Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption. Results of a Cooperative Agreement between USEPA and TERA. Available at http://www.tera.org/pubs/cdrpage.htm
25. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997a. Exposure Factors Handbook. Volume II. Food Ingestion Factors. Chapter 10. Intake of Fish and Shellfish. EPA/600/P-95/002Fb, Washington, DC, USA
26. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997b. Exposure Factors Handbook. Volume III. Activity Factors. Chapter 15. EPA/600/P-95/002Fc, Washington, DC, USA
27. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997c. Exposure Factors Handbook. Volume I. General Factors. Chapter 7. Body Weight Factors. EPA/600/P-95/002Fa, Washington, DC, USA
28. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidance for Conducting Fish and Wildlife Consumption Surveys. EPA 823-B-98-007, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/fishguid. pdf
29. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2000a. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories, Volume I, Fish Sampling and Analysis. Third Edition. EPA 823-B-00-007, Washington, DC, USA
30. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2000b. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories, Volume 2, Risk Assessment and Fish Consumption Limits. Third Edition. EPA 823-B-00-008, Washington, DC, USA
31. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Human Health Risk Assessment GE/Housatonic River Site Rest of River Volume IV, Consumption of Fish and Waterfowl Risk Assessment. Washington, DC, USA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/region01/ge/thesite/restofriver/reports/final.hhra/HHRA_Vol4/ 44019_HHRA_Vol4.pdf
32. West PC, Fly JM, Marans R, et al. 1989. Michigan Sport Anglers Fish Consumption Survey. Natural Resource Sociology Research Lab Technical Report #1. University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
33. Whelton SP, He J, Whelton PK, et al. 2004. Meta-analysis of observational studies on fish intake and coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 93:1119-23
34. Wilson ND, Shear NM, Paustenbach DJ, et al. 1998. The effect of cooking practices on the concentration of DDT and PCB compounds in the edible tissue of fish. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 8:423-40
35. Wolfe RJ. 1996. Subsistence food harvests in rural Alaska, and food safety issues. Paper presented to the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences Committee on Environmental Justice, Spokane, WA, USA. Available at www.state.ak.us/adfg/subsist/download/food962.pdf