Trends in cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis in a reference hospital in Izmir/Turkey: A comperative study for four years

Genetic Counseling

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 53-59

  Gunduz, C ^a   Cogulu, Ozgur ^a   Cankaya, T ^a   Bora, E ^a   Karaca, E ^a   Alpman, A ^a   Sagol, S ^a   Onay, H ^a   Ozkinay, F ^a   Ozkinay, C ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Amniocentesis; Prenatal diagnosis; Trends

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOGENETICS; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FETUS BLOOD SAMPLING; FETUS MALFORMATION; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNIOTIC FLUID; CATCHMENT AREA (HEALTH); CYTOGENETICS; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; LINKAGE (GENETICS); PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TURKEY;

EID: 12144289745     PISSN: 10158146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BOYD P. A., CHAMBERLAIN P, HICKS N.R.: 6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK. Lancet, 1998, 352, 1577-1581.
2. CARON L., TIHY F, DALLAIRE L.: Frequencies of chromosomal abnormalities at amniocentesis: over 20 years of cytogenetic analyses in one laboratory. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1999, 82, 149-154.
3. CHAABOUNI H., CHAABOUNI M., MAAZOUL F., M'RAD R., BEN JEMAA L., SMAOUI N., TERRAS K., KAMMOUN H., BELGHITH N., RIDENE H., BOUJEMAA O., ZOUARI F.: Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome disorders in Tunisian population. Ann. Genet., 2001, 44, 99-104.
4. COGULU O., TAS M.A., BOZOKLAR R., OZKINAY F.: Evaluation of 437 amniotic fluid samples in prenatal diagnosis. J. Neonatology. 1998, 5, 25-29.
5. EPSTEIN C.J., GOLBUS M.S.: Prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases. Am. Sci., 1977, 65, 703-711.
6. GERBIE A.B., NADLER H.L., GERBIE M. V.: Amniocentesis in genetic counselling. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1971, 109, 765-768.
7. HAMEL G., SIMARD L., GAGNE R., DE BRAEKELEER M.: Genetic amniocentesis: a six-years experience in an isolated region of northeastern Quebec (Canada). Genet. Counsel., 1993, 4, 103-108.
8. HOOK E.B., CROSS P.K., SCHREINEMACHERS D.M.: Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants. JAMA, 1983, 249, 2034-2038.
9. HSIEH F.J., KO T.M., TSENG L.H., CHANG L.S., PAN M.F., CHUANG S.M., LEE T.Y., CHEN H.Y.: Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis in amniocentesis. J. Formos. Med. Assoc., 1992, 91, 276-282.
10. th weeks: Evaluation of the earliest possible genetic diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn., 1992, 12, 595-601.
11. LAXOVA R., LEWIS B. V., SUDDABY M.: A clinical service for prenatal diagnosis. Lancet, 1975, 2, 964-966.
12. LIPPMAN A., TOMKINS D.J., SHIME J., HAMERTON J.L.: Canadian multicentre randomized clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. Prenat. Diagn., 1992, 12, 385-476.
13. MAC LACHLAN N.A.: Amniocentesis. In: Prenatal Diagnosis and Screening. D.J.H. Brock, C.H. Rodeck, M.A. Ferguson-Smith (eds). Hong Kong, Churchill Livingstone. 1992, 13-21.
14. MURER-ORLANDO M., ZAHED L., DOCHERTY Z.: Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities. Genetica, 1990, 83, 61-65.
15. MUTTON D., IDE R.G., ALBERMAN E.: Trends in prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down's syndrome, England and Wales, 1989-97. BMJ, 1998, 317, 922-923.
16. NABER J.M., HUETHER C.A., GOODWIN B.A.: Temporal changes in Ohio amniocentesis utilization during the first twelve years (1972-1983), and frequency of chromosome abnormalities observed. Prenat. Diagn., 1987, 7, 51-65.
17. OLSEN C.L., CROSS P.K.: Trends in the use of prenatal diagnosis in New York State and the impact of biochemical screening on the detection of Down syndrome, 1984-1993. Prenat. Diagn., 1997, 17, 1113-1124.
18. ROSEN D.J., KEDAR I., AMIEL A., BEN-TOVIM T., PETEL Y., KANETI H., TOHAR M., FEJGIN M.D.: A negative second trimester triple test and absence of specific ultrasonographic markers may decrease the need for genetic amniocentesis in advanced maternal age by 60%. Prenat. Diagn., 2002, 22, 59-63.
19. SIRIVATANAPA P., TONGSONG T., WANAPIRAK C., SIRICHOTIYAKUL S., CHANPRAPAPH P., YAMPOCHAI A., TAKAPIITRA A., SEKARARITHI R.: Prenatal diagnosis, 10-year experience. J. Med. Assoc. Thai., 2000, 83, 1502-1528.
20. STEELE M.W., BREG W.R.: Chromosome analysis of human fluid cells. Lancet, 1966, 1, 383-385.
21. STRANC L.C., EVANS J.A., HAMERTON J.L.: Prenatal diagnosis in Canada-1990. A review. Prenat. Diagn., 1994, 14, 1253-1255.
22. WILSON R.D.: Early amniocentesis, A clinical review. Prenat. Diagn., 1995, 15, 1259-1273.
23. YANG Y.H., JU K.S., KIM S.B., CHO Y.H., LEE J.H., LEE S.H., CHOI O.H., CHUN J.H., KIM J.I., KIM H.J., SOHN Y.S.: The Korean collaborative study on 11 000 prenatal genetic amniocentesis. Yonsei Med. J., 1999, 40, 460-466.
24. YOUNG S.R., SHIPLEY C.F., WADE R.V., EDWARDS J.G., WATERS M.B., CANTU M.L., BEST R.G., DENIS E.J.: Single-center comparison of results of 1000 prenatal diagnoses with chorionic villus sampling and 1000 diagnoses with amniocentesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1991, 165, 255-263.