메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 860-869

Reporting-rate variability and precision of white-tailed deer harvest estimates in Pennsylvania

Author keywords

Accuracy; Check station; Estimate; Harvest; Odocoileus virginianus; Pennsylvania; Precision; Registration; Report card; Reporting rate; White tailed deer

Indexed keywords

DEER; HARVESTING; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 12144281234     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0860:RVAPOW]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (25)

References (29)
  • 1
    • 0035687642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies
    • ANDERSON, D. R. 2001. The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:1294-1297.
    • (2001) Wildlife Society Bulletin , vol.29 , pp. 1294-1297
    • Anderson, D.R.1
  • 2
    • 0026077015 scopus 로고
    • Nonresponse bias in New Zealand waterfowl harvest surveys
    • BARKER, R. J. 1991. Nonresponse bias in New Zealand waterfowl harvest surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:126-131.
    • (1991) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.55 , pp. 126-131
    • Barker, R.J.1
  • 5
    • 0024474466 scopus 로고
    • Estimating population size for sparse data in capture-recapture experiments
    • CHAO, A. 1989. Estimating population size for sparse data in capture-recapture experiments. Biometrics 45:427-438.
    • (1989) Biometrics , vol.45 , pp. 427-438
    • Chao, A.1
  • 6
    • 12144272320 scopus 로고
    • Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
    • DIEFENBACH, D. R. 1993. Game take and furtaker survey. Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
    • (1993) Game Take and Furtaker Survey
    • Diefenbach, D.R.1
  • 7
    • 0001786982 scopus 로고
    • Vital statistics of animal populations
    • S. D. Schemnitz, editor. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    • DOWNING, R. L. 1980. Vital statistics of animal populations. Pages 247-267 in S. D. Schemnitz, editor. Wildlife management techniques manual. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
    • (1980) Wildlife Management Techniques Manual , pp. 247-267
    • Downing, R.L.1
  • 12
    • 0002230481 scopus 로고
    • Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations
    • T. A. Bookhout, editor. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
    • LANCIA, R. A., J. D. NICHOLS, AND K. H. POLLOCK, 1994. Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. Pages 215-253 in T. A. Bookhout, editor. Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
    • (1994) Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats , pp. 215-253
    • Lancia, R.A.1    Nichols, J.D.2    Pollock, K.H.3
  • 13
    • 0037888162 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How should detection probability be incorporated into estimates of relative abundance?
    • MACKENZIE, D. I., AND W. L. KENDALL. 2002. How should detection probability be incorporated into estimates of relative abundance? Ecology 83:2387-2393.
    • (2002) Ecology , vol.83 , pp. 2387-2393
    • MacKenzie, D.I.1    Kendall, W.L.2
  • 16
    • 0035110433 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Male harvest in relation to female removals in a black-tailed deer population
    • MCCULLOUGH, D. R. 2001. Male harvest in relation to female removals in a black-tailed deer population. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:46-58.
    • (2001) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.65 , pp. 46-58
    • McCullough, D.R.1
  • 17
    • 0033976433 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do wolves affect white-tailed deer buck harvest in northeastern Minnesota?
    • MECH, L. D., AND M. E. NELSON. 2000. Do wolves affect white-tailed deer buck harvest in northeastern Minnesota? Journal of Wildlife Management 64:129-136.
    • (2000) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.64 , pp. 129-136
    • Mech, L.D.1    Nelson, M.E.2
  • 18
    • 0026301152 scopus 로고
    • A comparative evaluation of techniques for analyzing white-tailed deer harvest data
    • ROSEBERRY, J. L., AND A. WOLFF. 1991. A comparative evaluation of techniques for analyzing white-tailed deer harvest data. Wildlife Monographs 117.
    • (1991) Wildlife Monographs 117
    • Roseberry, J.L.1    Wolff, A.2
  • 19
    • 0033673422 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A nationwide evaluation of deer hunter harvest survey techniques
    • RUPP, S. P., W. B. BALLARD, AND M. C. WALLACE. 2000. A nationwide evaluation of deer hunter harvest survey techniques. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:570-578.
    • (2000) Wildlife Society Bulletin , vol.28 , pp. 570-578
    • Rupp, S.P.1    Ballard, W.B.2    Wallace, M.C.3
  • 20
    • 0004282518 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
    • SAS INSTITUTE. 2000. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8.02. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
    • (2000) SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8.02
  • 21
    • 12144249300 scopus 로고
    • Some nonsampling errors in the Canadian waterfowl mail survey
    • SEN, A. R. 1972. Some nonsampling errors in the Canadian waterfowl mail survey. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:951-954.
    • (1972) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.36 , pp. 951-954
    • Sen, A.R.1
  • 22
    • 12144281100 scopus 로고
    • Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
    • SHOPE, W. K. 1985. Game take survey. Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
    • (1985) Game Take Survey
    • Shope, W.K.1
  • 23
    • 0036816036 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Generic variance expressions, precision, and sampling optimization for the sex-age-kill model of population reconstruction
    • SKALSKI, J. R., AND J. J. MILLSPAUCH. 2002. Generic variance expressions, precision, and sampling optimization for the sex-age-kill model of population reconstruction. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:1308-1316.
    • (2002) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.66 , pp. 1308-1316
    • Skalski, J.R.1    Millspauch, J.J.2
  • 24
    • 0000522427 scopus 로고
    • Comparisons of big game harvest estimates from check station and telephone surveys
    • STEINERT, S. F., H. D. RIFFEL, AND G. C. WHITE. 1994. Comparisons of big game harvest estimates from check station and telephone surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 58:335-340.
    • (1994) Journal of Wildlife Management , vol.58 , pp. 335-340
    • Steinert, S.F.1    Riffel, H.D.2    White, G.C.3
  • 26
    • 0033672465 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design and evaluation of mail surveys to estimate deer harvest parameters
    • TAYLOR, C. E., D. L. OTIS, H. S. HILL, JR., AND C. R. RUTH. 2000. Design and evaluation of mail surveys to estimate deer harvest parameters. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:717-723.
    • (2000) Wildlife Society Bulletin , vol.28 , pp. 717-723
    • Taylor, C.E.1    Otis, D.L.2    Hill Jr., H.S.3    Ruth, C.R.4
  • 28
    • 0035050733 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why take calculus? Rigor in wildlife management
    • WHITE, G. C. 2001. Why take calculus? Rigor in wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:380-386.
    • (2001) Wildlife Society Bulletin , vol.29 , pp. 380-386
    • White, G.C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.