From mirror self-recognition to the looking-glass self: Exploring the justification hypothesis

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 47-65

  Shaffer, Leigh S ^a  

^a WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Justification Hypothesis; Looking glass self; Social psychology; Sociology; Tree of Knowledge (ToK) System

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; CULTURAL FACTOR; EGO; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; JUSTIFICATION HYPOTHESIS; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIETY; SPEECH; THINKING; TREE OF KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM;

ATTITUDE; COGNITION; CULTURE; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 12144267767     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20090     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Adler, P.A., Adler, P., & Fontana, A. (1987). Everyday life sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 217-235.
2. Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9).
3. Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Backman, C.W. (1985). Identity, self presentation, and the resolution of moral dilemmas: Towards a social psychological theory of moral behavior. In B.R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 261-290). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (1973). From pervasive ambiguity to a definition of the situation. Sociometry, 36, 378-389.
6. Baylis, C.A. (1967). Conscience. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 189-191). New York: Macmillan.
7. Broom, L., & Selznick, P. (1973). Sociology: A text with adapted readings (5th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
8. Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.
9. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cody, M.J., & McLaughlin, M.L. (1988). Accounts on trial: Oral arguments in traffic court. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 113-126). London: Sage.
12. Collins, R. (1989). Toward a Neo-Meadian sociology of mind. Symbolic Interaction, 12(1), 1-32.
13. Couch, C.J. (1989). Comments on a Neo-Meadian sociology of the mind. Symbolic Interaction, 12(1), 59-62.
14. Cooley, C.H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
15. Denzin, N. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
16. Desmonde, W.H. (1967). George Herbert Mead. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 5, pp. 231-233). New York: Macmillan.
17. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
18. Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original Work published in 1897.)
19. Freud, S. (1962). Civilization and its discontents. New York: Norton. (Original work published in 1930.)
20. Gangestad, S.W., & Snyder, C.R. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 530-555.
21. Gerth, H.H., & Mills, C.W. (1953). Character and social structure, part three. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
22. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Prentice Hall.
23. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
24. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
25. Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Henriques, G. (2003). The Tree of Knowledge System and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7(2), 150-182.
27. Henriques, G. (2004). Psychology defined. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1207-1221.
28. Hewitt, J.P. (2000). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
29. Hewitt, J.P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1-11.
30. Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Jackson, J.M. (1988). Social psychology, past and present: An integrative orientation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. James, W. (1891). The principles of psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Keenan, J., Gallup, G.G., Jr., & Falk, D. (2003). The face in the mirror: The search for the origins of consciousness. New York: Ecco/HarperCollins.
34. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation: The organization of meaning in social interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
36. McPhail, C. (1989). Meadian versus Neo-Meadian theories of mind. Symbolic Interaction, 12(1), 43-51.
37. Mead, G.H. (1930). Cooley's contribution to American social thought. American Sociological Review, 35, 693-706.
38. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Miller, D.L. (1973). George Herbert Mead-Self, language and the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Mills, C.W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
41. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
42. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 4, 515-526.
43. Rochberg-Halton, E. (1989). Mead market or slaughterhouse? Symbolic Interaction, 12(1), 33-36.
44. Scheff, T.J. (1985). The primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 40, 849-850.
45. Scheff, T.J. (1988). Shame and conformity: The deference-emotion system. American Sociological Review, 53, 395-406.
46. Scheff, T.J. (1990). Socialization of emotions: Pride and shame as causal agents. In T.D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agenda in the sociology of emotions (pp. 281-304). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
47. Scheff, T.J. (1993). Toward a social psychological theory of mind and consciousness. Social Research, 60(1), 171-195.
48. Scheff, T.J. (2000). Shame and the social bond: A sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 84-99.
49. Scheff, T.J. (2003). Shame and self in society. Symbolic Interaction, 26(2), 239-262.
50. Scheibe, K. (1985). Historical perspectives on the presented self. In B.R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 33-64). New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Scheibe, K. (1987). Retrospective review: Goffman redux. Contemporary Psychology, 32(6), 501-502.
52. Schonbach, P. (1980). A category system for account phases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 195-200.
53. Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers, Vol. 1: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
54. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Schwalbe, M.L. (1983). Language and the self: An expanded view from a symbolic interactionist perspective. Symbolic Interaction, 6(2), 291-306.
56. Schwalbe, M.L. (1993). Goffman against postmodernism: Emotion and the reality of the self. Symbolic Interaction, 16(4), 335-350.
57. Scott, M.B., & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
58. Shaffer, V.A., & Renner, M.J. (2000). Black and white colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza) do not show mirror self-recognition. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 13(3-4), 154-160.
59. Sherif, M. (1966). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper Torchbooks. (Original work published 1936.)
60. Sherif, M. (1968). Self concept. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 150-159).
61. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C.W. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper and Row.
62. Smith, M.B. (1978). Perspectives of selfhood. American Psychologist, 33(12), 1053-1063.
63. Snyder, C.R., Higgins, R.L., & Stucky, R.J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in search of grace. New York: Wiley.
64. Stone, G.P., & Farberman, H.A. (1983). Social psychology through symbolic interaction (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
65. Strauss, A. (1956). The social psychology of George Herbert Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Stryker, S. (1977). Developments in "two social psychologies": Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40, 145-160.
67. Swanson, G.E. (1961). Mead and Freud: Their relevance for social psychology. Sociometry, 24(4), 319-339.
68. Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization. American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.
69. Tetlock, P.E. (1985). Toward an intuitive politician model of attribution processes. In B.R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 203-234). New York: McGraw-Hill.
70. Thoits, P.A. (1995). Social psychology: The interplay between sociology and psychology. Social Forces, 73(4), 1231-1243.
71. Thomas, W.I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (Vols. 1-5). Boston: Richard G. Badger.
72. Watson, J.B. (1936). Autobiography. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 3, pp. 271-281). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
73. Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Wrong, D. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern society. American Sociological Review, 26, 183-193.