Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 87-131

  Payne, John W ^a   Bettman, James R ^a   Johnson, Eric J ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice; Judgment; Preference; Uncertainty; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 11944264938     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abelson, R. P., Levi, A. 1985. Decision making and decision theory. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, ed. G. Lindzey, E. Aronson. New York: Random House
2. Alba, J. W., Hutchinson, J. W. 1987. Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consum. Res. 13:411-54
3. Alloy, L. B., Tabachnik, N. 1984. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: the joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychol. Rev. 91:112-49
4. Anderson, J. R. 1982. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychol. Rev. 89:369-406
5. Arkes, H. R., Blumer, C. 1985. The psychology of sunk costs. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 35:124-40
6. Arkes, H. R., Dawes, R. M., Christensen, C. 1986. Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37:93-110
7. Aschenbrenner, K. M. 1984. Moment versus dimension-oriented theories of risky choice: a (fairly) general test involving single-peaked preferences. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10:513-35
8. Ashton, R. H. 1992. Pressure and performance in accounting decision settings: paradoxical effects of incentives, feedback, and justification. J. Acct. Res. In press
9. Ashton, R. H., Kleinmuntz, D. N., Sullivan, J. B., Tomassini, L. A. 1989. Audit decision making. In Research Opportunities in Auditing: The Second Decade, ed. A. R. Abdel-Khalik, I. Solomon, pp. 95-132. Sarasota, FL: Am. Account. Assoc., Auditing Sect.
10. Bar-Hillel, M. 1984. Representativeness and fallacies of probability judgment. Acta Psychol. 55:91-107
11. Bar-Hillel, M. 1990. Back to base-rates. See Hogarth 1990, pp. 200-16
12. Baron, J. 1988. Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
13. Bazerman, M. H. 1990. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: John Wiley. 2nd ed.
14. Beach, L. R. 1990. Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts. New York: John Wiley
15. Beach, L. R., Barnes, V. E., Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. 1986. Beyond heuristics and biases: a contingency model of judgmental forecasting. J. Forecast. 5:143-57
16. Beach, L. R., Mitchell, T. R. 1978. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad. Manage. Rev. 3:439-49
17. Beach, L. R., Mitchell, T. R. 1987. Image theory: principles, plans, and goals in decision making. Acta Psychol. 66:201-20
18. Beattie, J., Baron, J. 1992. Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. In press
19. Becker, J. L., Sarin, R. K. 1987. Lottery dependent utility. Manage. Sci. 33:1367-82
20. Bell, D. E. 1982. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30:961-81
21. Bell, D. E. 1985. Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33:1-27
22. Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., Yagil. J. 1989. Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study. Manage. Sci. 35:270-84
23. Ben Zur, H., Breznitz, S. J. 1981. The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychol. 47:89-104
24. Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W. 1990. A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 45:111-39
25. Bettman, J. R., Kakkar, P. 1977. Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. J. Consum. Res. 3:233-40
26. Bettman, J. R., Park, C. W. 1980. Effects of prior knowledge, experience, and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. J. Consum. Res. 7:234-48
27. Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W., Staelin, R. 1986. Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information. J. Mark. Pub. Pol. 5:1-28
28. Bettman, J. R., Sujan, M. 1987. Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. J. Consum. Res. 14: 141-54
29. Biehal, G. J., Chakravarti, D. 1986. Consumers' use of memory and external information in choice: macro and micro processing perspectives. J. Consum. Res. 12:382-405
30. Biggs, S. F., Bedard, J. C., Gaber, B. G., Linsmeier, T. J. 1985. The effects of task size and similarity on the decision behavior of bank loan officers. Manage. Sci. 31:970-87
31. Billings, R. S., Marcus, S. A. 1983. Measures of compensatory and noncompensatory models of decision behavior: process tracing versus policy capturing. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 31:331-52
32. Blattberg, R. C., Hoch, S. J. 1990. Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model and 50% manager. Manage. Sci. 36:887-99
33. Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., Luce, R. D. 1990. The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 13:193-212
34. Brehmer, B. 1990. Strategies in real-time dynamic decision making. See Hogarth 1990, pp. 262-79
35. Budescu, D. V., Weinberg, S., Wallsten, T. S. 1988. Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 14:281-94
36. Bunn, D., Wright, G. 1991. Interaction of judgmental and statistical forecasting methods: issues & analysis. Manage. Sci. 37:501-18
37. Butler, S. A. 1986. Anchoring in the judgmental evaluation of audit samples. Account. Rev. 61:101-11
38. Camerer, C. F. 1987. Do biases in probability judgment matter in markets? Experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 77:981-97
39. Camerer, C. F. 1989. An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. J. Risk Uncertain. 2:61-104
40. Camerer, C. 1992. The rationality of prices and volume in experimental markets. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. In press
41. Camerer, C., Johnson, E. J. 1991. The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly? In Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits, ed. A. Ericsson, J. Smith, pp. 195-207. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
42. Carroll, J. S., Bazerman, M. H., Maury, R. 1988. Negotiator cognition: a descriptive approach to negotiators understanding their opponents. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 41:352-70
43. Casey, J. T. 1991. Reversal of the preference reversal phenomenon. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 48:224-51
44. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., Farr, M. J., eds. 1988. The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
45. Coupey, E. 1990. Decision Restructuring in consumer Choice. PhD thesis. Fuqua School of Business, Duke Univ.
46. Cox, A. D., Summers, J. D. 1987. Heuristics and biases in the intuitive projection of retail sales. J. Mark. Res. 24:290-97
47. Crandall, C. S., Greenfield, B. 1986. Understanding the conjunction fallacy: a conjunction of effects? Soc. Cognit. 4:408-19
48. Creyer, E. H., Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W. 1990. The impact of accuracy and effort feedback and goals on adaptive decision behavior. J. Behav. Decis. Making 3:1-16
49. Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., Schulze, W. D. 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An assessement of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld
50. Curley, S. P., Yates, J. F. 1985. The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preferences.
51. Weber, M., Eisenfuhr, F., von Winterfeldt, D. 1988. The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Manage. Sci. 34:431-45
52. Wells, G. L. 1985. The conjunction error and the representativeness heuristic. Soc. Cogn. 3:266-79
53. Yates, J. F., Carlson, B. W. 1986. Conjunction errors: evidence for multiple judgment procedures, including 'signed summation'. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37: 230-53
54. Zakay, D. 1985. Post-decisional confidence and conflict experienced in a choice process. Acta Psychol. 58:75-80