Predation risk affects diapause induction in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae

Experimental and Applied Acarology

Volumn 34, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 307-314

  Kroon, Annemarie ^a   Veenendaal, René L ^a   Bruin, Jan ^a   Egas, Martijn ^a   Sabelis, Maurice W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Diapause; Photoperiod; Predation risk; Predator induced effect; Tetranychus urticae; Typhlodromus pyri

Indexed keywords

DIAPAUSE; PHOTOPERIOD; PREDATION RISK;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COLD; FEMALE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MITE; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; RISK; TETRANYCHIDAE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; COLD; FEMALE; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; MITES; PHOTOPERIOD; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RISK; TETRANYCHIDAE;

ACARI; ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; TETRANYCHIDAE; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE; TYPHLODROMUS PYRI; URTICAE;

EID: 11944253582     PISSN: 01688162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-004-2207-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cohen D. 1970. A theoretical model for the optimal timing of diapause. Am. Nat. 104: 389-400.
2. Danks H.V. 1987. Insect Dormancy: An Ecological Perspective. Biological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.
3. Dicke M. and Grostal P. 2001. Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 1-23.
4. Dixon A.F.G. 1998. Aphid Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London.
5. Dixon A.F.G. and Agarwala B.K. 1999. Ladybird-induced life-history changes in aphids. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1549-1553.
6. Faraji F., Janssen A. and Sabelis M.W. 2001. Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterat-tacking prey. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25: 613-623.
7. Foott W.H. 1965. Geotactic response of the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina, Tetranychidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 95: 106-108.
8. Gould H.J. and Kingham H.G. 1965. Observations on diapause in Tetranychus urticae infesting cucumbers. Plant Pathol. 14: 174-178.
9. Grostal P. and Dicke M. 1999. Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions. Behav. Ecol. 10: 422-427.
10. Hairston N.G. 1987. Diapause as a predator-avoidance adaptation. In: Kerfoot W.C. and Sib A. (eds), Predation, Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover and London, pp. 281-290.
11. Helle W. and Sabelis M.W. (eds) 1985. Spider mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. IA. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
12. Hussey N.W. and Parr W.J. 1963. Dispersal of the glasshouse red spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 6: 207-214.
13. Janssen A., Faraji F., van der Hammen T., Magalhães S. and Sabelis M.W. 2002. Interspecific infanticide deters predators. Ecol. Lett. 5: 490-494.
14. Koveos D.S., Kroon A. and Veerman A. 1993a. The same clock may control induction and maintenance of diapause in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. J. Biol. Rhythms 8(4): 265-282.
15. Koveos D.S., Kroon A. and Veerman A. 1993b. Geographic variation of diapause intensity in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Physiol. Entomol. 18: 50-56.
16. Kroon A., Veenendaal R.L. and Veerman A. 1997. Photoperiodic diapause in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae: qualitative or quantitative time measurement? Physiol. Entomol. 22: 357-364.
17. Kroon A., Veenendaal R.L., Egas M., Bruin J. and Sabelis M.W. 2005. Diapause incidence in the two-spotted spider mite increases due to predator presence, not due to selective predation. Exp. Appl. Acarol. in press.
18. Nilssen J.P. 1977. Cryptic predation and the demographic strategy of two limnetic cyclopoid copepods. Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobiol. 34: 187-196.
19. Nilssen J.P. 1980. When and how to reproduce: a dilemma for limnetic cyclopoid copepods. In: Kerfoot W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. Amer. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr. Spec. Symp. Vol. 3. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp. 418-426.
20. Overmeer W.P.J. 1981. Notes on breeding phytoseiid mites from orchards (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 46(2): 503-509.
21. Parr J.W. and Hussey N.W. 1966. Diapause in the glasshouse red spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch): a synthesis of present knowledge. Hortic. Res. 6: 1-21.
22. Popov S.Y. and Veerman A. 1996. Behavioural response and winter survival of mated and unmated diapausing females of the Tetranychus atlanticus-urticae complex. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 167-175.
23. Sabelis M.W. and Bakker F.M. 1992. How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 16: 203-225.
24. Slusarczyk M. 1999. Predator-induced diapause in Daphnia magna may require two chemical cues. Oecologia 119: 159-165.
25. So P.-M. and Takafuji A. 1991. Coexistance of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae) with different capacities for diapause: comparative life-history traits. Oecologia 87: 146-151.
26. Strickler J.R. and Twombly S. 1975. Reynolds number, diapause and predatory copepods. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol Verb. 19: 2943-2950.
27. Takafuji A. 1994. Variation in diapause characteristics and its consequences on population phenomena in the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. In: Danks H.V. (ed.). Insect Life-Cycle Polymorphism. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 113-132.
28. Veerman A. 1977. Aspects of the induction of diapause in a laboratory strain of the mite Tetranychus urticae. J. Insect Physiol. 23: 703-711.
29. Veerman A. 1985. Diapause. In: Helle W. and Sabelis M.W. (eds), Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 279-316.
30. Weisser W.W., Braendle C. and Minoretti N. 1999. Predator-induced morphological shift in the pea aphid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1175-1181.
31. Zar J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.