Age differences in interrogative suggestibility: A comparison between young and older adults

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1097-1107

  Polczyk, Romuald ^a   Wesołowska, Bogumiła ^a   Gabarczyk, Agnieszka ^a   Minakowska, Iwona ^a   Supska, Magdalena ^a   Bomba, Ewa ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECALL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUGGESTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 11844305992     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1073     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Binet, A. (1900). La suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher Frères.
2. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness. A historical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
3. Choynowski, M. (1959). Skala pamieci - podrecznik tymczasowy. [Memory Scale - Preliminary Manual]. Warszawa: PAN.
4. Cohen, G., & Faukner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: effects on reality monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 10-17.
5. Cole, C. B., & Loftus, E. F. (1987). The memory of children. In J. S. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 178-208). New York: Springer Verlag.
6. Coxon, P., & Valentine, T. (1997). The effects of the age of eyewitnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 415-430.
7. Crook, T. H., & Larrabee, G. J. (1990). A self rating scale for evaluating memory in everyday life. Psychology and Aging, 5, 48-57.
8. Danielsdottir, G., Sigurgeirsdottir, S., Einarsdottir, H. R., & Haraldsson, E. (1993). Interrogative suggestibility in children and its relationship with memory and vocabulary. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 499-502.
9. Gheorghiu, V. A. (1989). The development of research on suggestibility: critical considerations. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H. J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 3-56). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303-314.
11. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987a). A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 215-221.
12. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987b). The relationship between memory and suggestibility. Social Behavior 2, 29-33.
13. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Manual. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
14. Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clark, N. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: a social psychological model. Social Behavior 1 83-104.
16. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Henry, L. (2003). Child and adult witnesses with intellectual disability: the importance of suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 241-252.
17. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Lister, S. (1984). Interrogative suggestibility and its relationship with perceptions of self-concept and control. Joumal of the Forensic Science Society, 24, 99-110.
18. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Singh, K. K. (1984). Interrogative suggestibility and delinquent boys: an empirical validation study. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 425-430.
19. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
20. Loftus, E. F., Levidov, B., & Duensing, S. (1992). Who remembers best? Individual differences in memory for events that occurred in a science museum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 93-107.
21. Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., & Mather, M. (2003). Source monitoring and suggestibility to misinformation: Adult age-related differences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 107-119. DOI: 10.1002/acp.857.
22. Polczyk, R. (2000). Wplyw spoleczny a róinice indywidulne: Skale Sugestybilności Interrogatywnej Gudjonssona [Social influence and individual differences: Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales]. Kolokwia Psychologiczne nr 8: Wplyw spoleczny: Badania i praktyka. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii PAN.
23. Richardson, G., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Kelly, T. P. (1995). Interrogative suggestibility in an adolescent forensic population. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 211-216.
24. Schacter, D. L., Koutstaal, W., Johnson, M. K., Gross, M. S., & Angell, K. E. (1997). False recollection induced by photographs. Psychology and Aging, 12, 203-215.
25. Schooler, J. W., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Individual differences and experimentation: complementary approaches to interrogative suggestibility. Social Behavior 1, 105-112.
26. Singh, K. K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The vulnerability of adolescent boys to interrogative pressure: an experimental study. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 3, 167-170.
27. Warren, A., Hulse-Trotter, K., & Tubbs, E. C. (1991). Inducing resistance to suggestibility in children. Law and Human Behavior 15, 273-285.
28. Wechsler, D. (1945). The Wechsler Memory Scale. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
29. Young, K., Powell, M. B., & Dudgeon, P. (2003). Individual differences in children's suggestibility: a comparison between intellectually disabled and mainstream samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 31-49.