Comparing the Quality of Confinement and Cost-Effectiveness of Public Versus Private Prisons: What We Know, Why We Do Not Know More, and Where to Go from Here

The Prison Journal

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 301-322

  Perrone, Dina ^a   Pratt, Travis C ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cost comparisons; prison privatization; quality of confinement

Indexed keywords

EID: 11844295309     PISSN: 00328855     EISSN: 15527522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0032885503256329     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anderson, P., Davoli, C. R., & Moriarty, L. (1985). Private corrections: Feast or fiasco? The Prison Journal, 65, 32-41.
2. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3. Archambeault, W. G., & Deis, D. R. (1996, December). Cost-effectiveness comparisons of private versus public prisons in Louisiana: A comprehensive analysis of Allen, Avoyelles, and Winn Correctional Centers (Executive Summary). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, School of Social Work.
4. Austin, J., & Coventry, G. (1999). Emerging issues on privatized prisons. Washington, DC: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
5. Beck, A. J., & Karberg, J. C. (2001, March). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2000 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
6. Bowditch, C., & Everett, R. S. (1987). Private prisons: Problems with the solution. Justice Quarterly, 4, 441-453.
7. Brister, R. C. (1996). Changing of the guard: A case for privatization of Texas prisons. The Prison Journal, 76, 310-330.
8. Camp, S. D. (1999). Do inmate survey data reflect prison conditions? Using surveys to assess prison conditions of confinement. The Prison Journal, 79, 250-268.
9. Camp, S. D., & Gaes, G. G. (1998, October). Private adult prisons: What we know and how we can know more, monograph. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division.
10. Camp, S. D., Saylor, W. G., & Wright, K. N. (1999). Creating performance measures from survey data: A practical discussion. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 71-80.
11. Colson, C. (1989). Alternatives to reduce prison crowding. Journal of State Government, 62, 59-94.
12. Corrections Corporation of America. (2001). Frequently asked questions (FAQ). Available from www.correctionscorp.com/statsqa.html
13. Cox, N. R., & Osterhoff, W. E. (1993). The public-private partnership: A challenge and an opportunity for corrections. In G. Bowman, S. Hakim, & P. Seidenstat (eds.), Privatizing correctional institutions (pp. 113-129). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
14. Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15. DiIulio, J. J. (1987). Governing prisons: A comparative study of correctional management.New York: Free Press.
16. DiIulio, J. J. (1991). No escape: The future of American corrections. New York: Basic Books.
17. Drowota, C. (1995). Comparative evaluation of privately-managed CCA prisons (South Central Correctional Center) and state-managed prototypical prisons (Northeast Correctional Center, Northwest Correctional Center) (Executive Summary). Nashville, TN: Select Oversight Committee on Corrections, Tennessee Assembly.
18. Durham, A. M. (1989). The privatization of punishment: Justification, expectations, and experience. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3, 48-73.
19. Geis, G., Mobley, A., & Shichor, D. (1999). Private prisons, criminological research, and conflict of interest: A case study. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 372-388.
20. General Accounting Office. (1996). Private and public prisons: Studies comparing operational costs and/or quality of service. Washington, DC: Author.
21. Harding, R. (1998). Evaluating private prisons: A reply. The Australian Journal of Criminology, 31, 314-320.
22. Harland, A. (1997). Editorial introduction. The Prison Journal, 77, 3-5.
23. Henig, J. R. (1985). Privatization and decentralization: Should governments shrink? Public Policy and Federalism, 12, 26-53.
24. Home Office. (1999). Research development statistics. Available from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prischap1.html
25. Lanza-Kaduce, L., Parker, K. F., & Thomas, C. W. (2000). The devil in the details: The case against the case study of private prisons, criminological research and conflict of interest. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 92-136.
26. Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. (1998). The importance of evaluating correctional programs: Assessing outcome and quality. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 22-29.
27. Lilly, R. J., & Deflem, M. (1996). Profit and reality: An analysis of the corrections commercial complex. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 3-20.
28. Lilly, R. J., & Knepper, P. (1993). The corrections-commercial complex. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 150-166.
29. Lipsey, M. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cooket al. (eds.), Meta-Analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
30. Logan, C. H. (1987). The propriety of prisons. Federal Probation, 51, 35-40.
31. Logan, C. H. (1990). Private prisons: Cons and pros. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Logan, C. H. (1992). Well-kept: Comparing quality of confinement in private and public prisons. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 575-613.
33. Logan, C. H. (1996). Public vs. private prison management: A case comparison. Criminal Justice Review, 21, 62-85.
34. MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 457-471.
35. Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. (1998). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36. McConville, S. (1987). Aid from industry? Private corrections and prison crowding. In S. Gottfredson & S. McConville (eds.), America's correctional crisis: Prison populations and public policy (pp. 221-242). New York: Greenwood.
37. McDonald, D. C. (1989). The cost of corrections: In search of the bottom line. Research In Corrections, 2, 1-26.
38. Mitchell, G. A. (1996, December). Controlling prison costs in Wisconsin (Report No. 9). Thiensville: Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Inc.
39. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (1998, April). Review of Bay Correctional Facility and Moore Haven Correctional Facility (Report No. 97-68). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
40. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (2000, March). South Bay Correctional Facility provides savings and success: Room for improvement (Private Prison Review Report No. 99-39). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
41. Ogle, R. S. (1999). Prison privatization: An environmental catch-22. Justice Quarterly, 16, 579-600.
42. Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Petersilia, J. (1996). Improving corrections policy: The importance of researchers and practitioners working together. In A. T. Harland (ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 223-231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Pratt, T. C., & Maahs, J. (1999). Are private prisons more cost-effective than public prisons? A meta-analysis of evaluation research studies. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 358-371.
45. Reisig, M. D. (1998). Rates of disorder in higher-custody state prisons: A comparative analysis of managerial practices. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 229-244.
46. Reisig, M. D., & Pratt, T. C. (2000). The ethics of correctional privatization: A critical examination of the delegation of coercive authority. The Prison Journal, 80, 210-222.
47. Schiraldi, V., & Greene, J. (2002, February). Cutting correctly: New state policies for times of austerity (Policy Report). Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
48. Sechrest, D. K., & Shichor, D. (1996). Comparing public and private correctional facilities in California: An exploratory study. In G. L. Mays & T. Gray (eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences (pp. 133-151). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
49. Sellers, M. P. (1989). Private and public prisons: A comparison of costs, programs and facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 33, 241-256.
50. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
51. Shichor, D. (1993). The corporate context of private prisons. Crime, Law and Social Change, 20, 113-138.
52. Shichor, D. (1995). Punishment for profit: Private prisons/public concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Steelman, S., & Harms, K. (1986). Construction management firms—saving time and money. Corrections Today, 48, 64-66.
54. Texas Sunset Advisory Commission. (1990, December). Contracts for correctional facilities and services (Staff Report to the Sunset Advisory Commission). Austin, TX: Author.
55. Thomas, C. W. (1997, August). Comparing the cost and performance of public and private prisons in Arizona, monograph. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Corrections.
56. Thomas, C. W. (2001, September). Private Adult Correctional Facility Census: A “real-time” statistical profile. Available from http://web.crim.ufl.edu/pcp/census/2001/
57. Urban Institute. (1985, August). Comparison of privately and publicly operated corrections facilities in Kentucky and Massachusetts, project report. Washington, DC: Author.
58. Useem, B., & Reisig, M. D. (1999). Collective action in prisons: Protests, disturbances, and riots. Criminology, 37, 735-760.
59. Van Slambrouck, P. (1998, August 6). U.S. prisons—under pressure—shows increase in violence. Christian Science Monitor. Available from http://www.csmonitor.com/durable/1998/08/06/pls2.htm
60. Van Voorhis, P. (1994). Measuring prison disciplinary problems: A multiple indicators approach to understanding prison adjustment. Justice Quarterly, 11, 679-709.
61. Vardalis, J. J., & Becker, F. W. (2000). Legislative opinions concerning the private operation of state prisons: The case of Florida. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 136-148.
62. Wackenhut. (2001). The Wackenhut corporation press release page. Available from www.wackenhut.com/twc-pr.html
63. Winn, R. G. (1996). Ideology and the calculation of efficiency in public and private correctional enterprise. In G. L. Mays & T. Gray (eds.), Privatization and the provision of correctional services: Context and consequences (pp. 21-30). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.