Surface energy characterization of preservative-treated wood and E-glass/phenolic composites

Forest Products Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 262-268

  Tascioglu, Cihat ^a   Goodell, Barry ^b   Lopez Anido, Roberto ^c   Gardner, Douglas ^b  

^a ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^c The University of Maine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP); LIGNOCELLULOSIC WOODS; PHENOLIC COMPOSITES; PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS PRESERVATION; CELLULOSE; CHARACTERIZATION; FIBERS; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; ORGANOMETALLICS; PHENOLIC RESINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

WOOD;

CELLULASE; FIBERS; PINUS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE ENERGY; WOOD;

PINUS ECHINATA;

EID: 11844279150     PISSN: 00157473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Collet, B.M. 1972. A review of surface and interfacial adhesion in wood science and related fields. Wood Sci. and Tech. 6(1):1-42.
2. Dagher, H.J., J. Poulin, B. Abdel-Magid, S.M. Shaler, W. Tjoelker, and B. Yeh. 1998. FRP reinforcement of Douglas fir and Western Hemlock glulam beams. In: International Composites Expo '98. Nashville, TN.
3. Gardner, D.J., N.C. Generalla, D.W. Gunnells, and M.P. Wolcott. 1991. Dynamic wettability of wood. Langmuir. 7(11):2,498-2,502.
4. _, W. Tze, and Q. Shi. 1999. Surface energy characterization of wood particles by contact angle analysis and inverse gas chromatography. In: Progress in Lignocellulosics Characterization. D.S. Argyropoulos, ed. Tappi Press, Atlanta, GA. pp. 263-293.
5. Herzog, B., B. Goodell, R. Lopez-Anido, L. Muszyñski, D. Gardner, C. Tascioglu, Y. Hong, L. Eisenheld, and A. Pirvu. 2003. The effect of oil-borne preservative systems on the adhesive bondlines of FRP/glulam composite beams. Submitted for publication.
6. Hse, C.Y. 1972. Wettability of southern pine veneer by phenol-formaldehyde wood adhesives. Forest Prod. J. 22(1):51-56.
7. Maldas, D.C. and P.D. Kamden. 1998a. Surface tension and wettability of CCA-treated red maple. Wood and Fiber Sci. 30(4):368-373.
8. _ and _. 1998b. Surface characterization of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated red maple. J. Adhesion Sci. and Tech. 12(7):763-772.
9. Pocius, A.V. 1997. Adhesion and Adhesives Technology. Hanser/Gardner Publications, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. 279 pp.
10. Shen, Q., J. Nylund, and J.B. Rosenholm. 1998. Estimation of the surface energy and acid-base properties of wood by means of wetting method. Holzforschung. 52(5):521-529.
11. Tascioglu, C., B. Goodell, and R. Lopez-Anido. 2003. Bond durability characterization of preservative treated wood and E-glass/phenolic composite interfaces. Composites Sci. and Tech. (63):979-991.
12. _, _, and _. 2002. Effects of wood preservative treatments on mechanical properties of E-glass/phenolic pultruded composite reinforcement for wood. Forest Prod. J. 52:(11/12):53-61.
13. Tze, W. and D.J. Gardner. 2001. Contact angle and IGC measurements for probing surface-chemical changes in the recycling of wood pulp fibers. J. of Adhesion Sci. and Tech. 15(2):223-241.
14. Vick, C.B. 1994. Preliminary findings on adhesive bonding of CCA-treated southern pine. In: Proc. Adhesive and Bonded Wood Products. Proc. No. 4735. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI. pp. 158-176.
15. _, R.C. De Groot, and J. Young-quist. 1990. Compatibility of nonacidic water-borne preservatives with phenol-formaldehyde adhesive. Forest Prod. J. 40(2):16-22.
16. _ and T.A. Kuster. 1992. Mechanical interlocking of adhesive bonds to CCA-treated southern pine-A scanning electron microscopic study. Wood and Fiber Sci. 24(1): 36-46.
17. Vlosky, R.P. and T.F. Shupe. 2002. Home-owner attitudes and preferences for building materials with an emphasis on treated wood products. Forest Prod. J. 52(7/8):90-95.
18. Zhang, H.J., D.J. Gardner, J.Z. Wang, and Q. Shi. 1997. Surface tension, adhesive wettability, and bondability of artificially weathered CCA-treated southern pine. Forest Prod. J. 47(10):69-72.