Evaluation of primary duct closure vs T-tube drainage following choledochotomy [3]

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 227-228

  Marwah, Sanjay ^a,b   Singh, Ishwar ^a   Godara, Rajesh ^a   Sen, Jyotsana ^a   Marwah, Nisha ^a   Karwasra, R K ^a  

^a POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b HUDA   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYGLACTIN; SUTURE MATERIAL;

BILE LEAKAGE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLEDOCHOTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMON BILE DUCT; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; GALLSTONE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LETTER; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SAFETY; T TUBE; TREATMENT INDICATION; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; BILIARY TRACT SURGICAL PROCEDURES; DRAINAGE; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 11844276956     PISSN: 02548860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Seale AK, Ledet WP. Primary common bile duct closure. Arch Surg 1999;134:22-4.
2. Gharaibeh KIA, Heiss HA. Biliary leakage following T-tube removal. Int Surg 2000;85:57-63.
3. Sawyers IL, Herrington IL, Edwards WH. Primary closure of the CBD. Am J Surg 1965;109:107-12.
4. Mirrizzi PL. Primary suture of the common bile duct in choledocholithiasis. Arch Surg 1942;44:44-54.
5. Moreaux I. Traditional surgical management of common bile duct stones: a retrospective study during a 20 year experience. Am J Surg 1995;169:220-6.
6. Gillant DA, May RE, Kennedy R, Longstaff AJ. Complication of T-tube drainage of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg 1985;67:170-1.
7. Reinhoff WF. Primary closure of common bile duct. Ann Surg 1960;151:255-61.