A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 20-25

  Subirana, Mireia ^a   Solá, Ivan ^a   Garcia, Josep M ^a   Gich, Ignasi ^a   Urrútia, Gerard ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE LA SANTA CREU I SANT PAU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliographic databases; CINAHL; EMBASE; MEDLINE; Nursing; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; DATA BASE; EMBASE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; NURSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 11844271513     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. I.G. Needleman A guide to systematic reviews J Clin Periodontol 29 Suppl 3 2002 6 9
2. J.M. Magarey Elements of a systematic review Int J Nurs Pract 7 2001 376 382
3. A.R. Jadad, D.J. Cook, A. Jones, T.P. Klassen, P. Tugwell, M. Moher, and D. Moher Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals JAMA 280 1998 278 280
4. W.L. Deville, P.D. Bezemer, and L.M. Bouter Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy J Clin Epidemiol 53 2000 65 69
5. M. Petticrew Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions BMJ 322 2001 98 101
6. J. Glanville, M. Haines, and I. Auston Getting research finding into practice: finding information on clinical effectiveness BMJ 317 1998 200 203
7. S.H. Brenner CINAHL and MEDLINE: a comparison of indexing practices Bull Med Libr Assoc 77 1989 366 371
8. J. Burnham, and B. Shearer Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for the nurse researcher Med Ref Serv Q 12 3 1993 45 57
9. H. Brazier, and C.M. Begley Selecting a database for literature searches in nursing: MEDLINE or CINAHL? J Adv Nurs 24 1996 868 875
10. M.M. Watson, and R. Perrin A comparison of CINAHL and MEDLINE CD-ROM in four allied health areas Bull Med Libr Assoc 82 1994 214 216
11. E. Okuma Selecting CD-ROM databases for nursing students: a comparison of MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Bull Med Libr Assoc 82 1994 25 29
12. I. Coma, R. de Dios, and C. Montcusí Fuentes de información para enfermería: comparación entre las bases de datos CINAHL y MEDLINE Metas 14 1999 21 27
13. S.K. Khan G. ter Riet J. Glanville A.J. Sowden J. Kleijnen Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness. CRD Report no. 4 2nd ed. 2001 NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York York, UK [Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4. htm. ]
14. J. Cohen A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educ Psychol Meas 20 1960 37 46
15. J.R. Landis, and G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159 174
16. V.S. Conn, J.C. Valentine, H.M. Cooper, and M.J. Rantz Grey literature in meta-analyses Nurs Res 52 2003 256 261
17. M. Egger, and G.D. Smith Bias in location and selection of studies BMJ 316 1998 61 66
18. R.W. Scherer, K. Dickersin, and P. Langenberg Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis JAMA 272 1994 158 162