Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: Breaking the stalemate?

European Environment

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 317-330

  Szarka, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; WIND POWER;

DENMARK; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

GOES;

EID: 11844270545     PISSN: 09610405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.367     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Benard M. 1998. Electricity generation from renewable energy: the French experience, Renewable Energy 15: 264-269.
2. BirdLife International/Langston RHW, Pullan JD. 2002. Wind Farms and Birds: an Analysis of the Effects of Wind Farms on Birds, and Guidance on Environmental Assessment Criteria and Site Selection Issues, T-PVS/Inf (2002) 30 revised. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
3. Birraux C, Le Déaut J-Y. 2001. L'Etat Actuel et les Perspectives Techniques des Energies Renouvelables, rapport no. 3415. Office Parlementaire d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifiques et Technologiques/Assemblée Nationale: Paris.
4. Boehmer-Christiansen S, Kellow A. 2002. International Environmental Policy. Interests and the Failure of the Kyoto Process. Elgar: Cheltenham.
5. Brundt A, Spooner D. 1998. The development of wind power in Denmark and the UK. Energy and Environment 9(3): 279-296.
6. Country Guardian. 2000. What's Wrong with Windfarms? http://www.countryguardian.net/case.htm [18 February 2004].
7. Country Guardian. 2003. The Windfarm White Elephant. http://www.countryguardian.net/The%20windfarm%20white%20elephant.htm [18 February 2004].
8. Countryside Agency. 1999. Renewable Energy Developments. http://www.countryside.gov.uk/WhoWeAreAndWhatWeDo/boardmeetings/ boardPapers/CA_AP99_50.asp [26 February 2004].
9. Danish Environment and Energy Ministry. 1996. Energy 21. The Danish Government's Action Plan for Energy 1996. Danish Environment and Energy Ministry: Copenhagen.
10. Danish Environment and Energy Ministry. 1999. Follow-Up on Energy 21: Status of Energy Planning. Danish Environment and Energy Ministry: Copenhagen.
11. Danish Government. 2002. Liberalisation of the Energy Markets. Danish Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs: Copenhagen.
12. Danish Government. 2003. Proposal for a Climate Strategy for Denmark http://www.mst.dk [8 July 2003].
13. de Gouvello C. 2002. France: focus on non-fossil fuels. In Vrolijk C (ed.), Climate Change and Power: Economic Instruments for European Electricity. Earthscan: London; 131-147.
14. Doherty B. 1992. The fundi-realo controversy: an analysis of four European Green parties. Environmental Politics 1(1): 95-120.
15. Dryzek JS. 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses Oxford University Press: Oxford.
16. English Nature RSPB, WWF-UK BWEA. 2001. Wind Farm Development and Nature Conservation. A Guidance Document for Nature Conservation Organisations and Developers when Consulting over Wind Farm Proposals in England. http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/wind_farm4.pdf [17 June 2003].
17. EWEA, Greenpeace. 2003. Wind Force 12: a Blueprint to Achieve 12% of the World's Electricity from Wind Power by 2020. EWEA-Greenpeace: Brussels.
18. Fischer F, Forester J (eds). 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham.
19. FoE. 2002. Wind Power: Your Questions Answered. FoE: London.
20. Gipe P. 1995. Wind Energy Comes of Age. Wiley: New York.
21. Gouvernement Français. 2000. Programme National de Lutte Contre le Changement Climatique. République Française: Paris.
22. Grohenheit PE. 2002. Denmark: long-term planning with different objectives. In Vrolijk C (ed.), Climate Change and Power: Economic Instruments for European Electricity. Earthscan: London; 108-130.
23. Hajer MA. 1993. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice. In Fischer F, Forester J (eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham; 43-76.
24. Hajer MA. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Clarendon: Oxford.
25. Helm D. 2002. A critique of renewables policy in the UK. Energy Policy 30(3): 185-188.
26. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2003. Wind Energy Annual Report 2002. IEA: Paris.
27. Jørgensen U, Karnøe P. 1995. The Danish wind-turbine story: technical solutions to political visions. In Rip AR, Misa TJ, Schot J (eds), Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. Pinter: London; 57-82.
28. Laali A-R, Benard M. 1999. French wind power generation programme EOLE 2005: results of the first call for tenders. Renewable Energy 16: 805-810.
29. Majone G. 1989. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
30. Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW. 1972. The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Pan: London.
31. Mitchell C. 1995. The renewables NFFO. Energy Policy 23(12 : 1077-1091.
32. Mitchell C. 2000. The England and Wales non-fossil fuel obligation: history and lessons. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25: 285-312.
33. National Trust. 1999. Executive committee 28 January 1999. http:// www.nationaltrust.org.uk/environment/html/env∩s/_fspapers/ fs_envissu4. htm [26 February 2004].
34. Nielsen FB. 2002. A formula for success in Denmark. In Pasqualetti MJ, Gipe RW, Righter RW (eds), Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World. Academic: London; 115-132.
35. Open Spaces Society. 2002. Policy on Wind Turbines. http://www.oss.org.uk/publications/infosht/a4.htm [17 June 2003].
36. Parker M. 2002. A low carbon energy policy for the UK under conditions of uncertainty. In Helm D (ed.), Towards an Energy Policy: The PIU Report and the White Paper. Oxera: Oxford; 31-41.
37. Rein M, Schön D. 1993. Reframing policy discourse. In Fischer F, Forester J (eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham; 145-166.
38. Rydin Y. 2003. Conflict, Consensus and Rationality in Environmental Planning: an Institutional Discourse Approach. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
39. Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith HC. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In Sabatier P (ed), Theories of the Policy Process. Westview: Boulder, CO; 117-166.
40. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. 2003. Our Energy Future - Creating a Low Carbon Economy, Cm 5761.
41. Steen N, Vrolijk C. 2002. United Kingdom: power markets and market policies. In Vrolijk C (ed.), Climate Change and Power: Economic Instruments for European Electricity. Earthscan: London; 224-256.
42. Strachan PA, Lal D. 2004. Wind energy policy, planning and management practice in the UK: hot air or gathering storm? Regional Studies 38(5): 551-571.
43. Toke D, Elliott D. 2000. A fresh start for UK wind power? International Journal of Ambient Energy 21(2): 67-76.
44. Wind Directions. 2004. May-June.