Evaluation of a portable ultrasound device immediately after spiral computed tomography;Einsatz eines tragbaren ultraschallgeräts unmittelbar nach spiral-computertomographie

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 433-437

  Oschatz, E ^a   Prosch, H ^a   Schober, E ^a   Mostbeck, G ^a  

^a Institut fur Rontgendiagnostik   (Austria)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Liver; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADRENAL DISEASE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KIDNEY DISEASE; LIVER DISEASE; MALE; PLEURA EMPYEMA; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADRENAL GLAND DISEASES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; LIVER DISEASES; PLEURAL DISEASES; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 11844268096     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813795     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Vourvouri EC, Poldermans D, Schinkel AFL et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening using a hand-held ultrasound device. A pilot study. Eur J Endovasc Surg 2001; 22: 352-354
2. Ryan SM, Smith E, Sidhu PS. Comparison of the SonoSite and Acuson 128/XP10 ultrasound machines in the "bed side" assessment of the post liver transplant patient. Eur J of Ultrasound 2002; 15: 37-43
3. Piepenpack A, Klebel F, Dorenbeck U et al. Evaluation eines tragbaren Ultraschallgerätes im Routinebetrieb der Klinik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 349-352
4. Eberhardt SC, Choi PH, Bach AM et al. Utility of sonography for small hepatic lesions found on computed tomography in patients with cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 335-343
5. Seitz K, Vasilakis D, Ziegler M. Was leistet die abdominelle B-Bild Diagnostik mit einem tragbaren Ultraschallgerät im Vergleich mit einem High-end Gerät? Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie. Ultraschall in Med 2003; 24: 96-100
6. Prokop M. Multislice CT: Technical principles and future trends. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 (Suppl 5): M3-M13
7. Jones EC, Chezmar JL, Nelson RC et al. The frequency and significance of small hepatic lesions (less than or equal to 15 mm) detected by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 535-539
8. Heyder N, Judmeyer G et al. Befundung und Nomenklatur bei Ultraschalluntersuchungen innerer Organe. Empfehlungen der Nomenklaturkommission der Sektion Innere Medizin der DEGUM und der ÖGUM. Springer, 1994
9. Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Ercolani MC et al. Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 1999; 210: 71-74
10. Barnes PA, Thomas JL, Bernardino ME. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of hepatic cysts by computed tomography. Radiology 1981; 141: 129-133
11. Seemann MD, Bonel H, Wintersperger B et al. Vergleich eines High-end Ultraschallgerätes mit einem Spiral-CT-Scanner beim Screening von Lebermetastasen. Ultraschall Med 1998; 19: 164-167
12. Brick SH, Hill MC, Lande IM. The mistaken or indeterminate CT diagnosis of mistaken hepatic metastases: the value of sonography. AJR 1987; 148: 723-726
13. Kearney SE, Davies CW, Davies RJ et al. Computed tomography and ultrasound in parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 542-547
14. Teichgräber UKM, Beuter T, Klühs L et al. Netzplantechnik zur Zeitplanung bei abdominellen Ultraschalluntersuchungen. Ultraschall in Med 1999; 20: 237-242
15. Fischer T, Filimonow S, Petersein J et al. Sonographie am Krankenbett: Zeitgewinn durch Nutzung eines tragbaren Ultraschallgerätes? Ultraschall in Med 2002; 23: 311-314