Not just Piaget; not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as alternative to Piaget

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 465-485

  Shayer, Michael ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11844265233     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00092-6     Document Type: Note

References (40)

1. Adey P.S. Shayer M. & Yates C. Thinking science: student and teachers' materials for the CASE intervention 2nd ed. 1995 Nelson London
2. Adey P. & Shayer M. Really raising standards 1994 Routledge London
3. Adey P. Robertson A. & Venville G. Let's think! 2001 NFER-Nelson Windsor
4. Adey P. Robertson A. & Venville G. Effects of a cognitive acceleration programme on year 1 pupils British Journal of Educational Psychology 72 2002 1-25
5. Adhami M. Johnson D.C. & Shayer M. Thinking maths: the programme for accelerated learning in mathematics 1998 Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books
6. Adhami, M., Johnson, D. C., & Shayer, M. (2002). Primary CAME thinking maths teachers' guide. BEAM Education, ISBN 1 903 142 296.
7. Beasley, F. P. (1984). An evaluation of Feurstein's model for the remediation of adolescents' cognitive deficits. PhD., University of London
8. Beasley F. Shayer M. Learning Potential Assessment through Feuerstein's LPAD: can quantitative results be achieved? International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction 1 2 1990 37-48
9. Belbin E. Applicable psychology and some national problems British Journal of Psychology 70 2 1979 187-197
10. Bereiter C. Toward a solution of the learning paradox Review of Educational Research 55 1985 201-226
11. Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (2000). http://www.massey.ac.nz/~Alock/colevyg.htm.
12. Collis K.F. A study of concrete and formal operations in school mathematics: a Piagetian viewpoint 1975 Australian Council for Educational Research Melbourne
13. Feuerstein R. Rand Y. Hoffman M. Miller M. Instrumental enrichment: an intervention programme for cognitive modifiability 1980 University Park Press Baltimore
14. Jones M. Gott R. Cognitive acceleration through science education: alternative perspectives International Journal of Science Education 20 7 1998 755-768
15. Hart, K. (Ed.) (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16, London: John Murray.
16. Howe A.C. Development of science concepts with a Vygotskian framework Science Education 80 1 1996 35-51
17. Inhelder B. Piaget J. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence 1958 Routledge London
18. Inhelder B. Piaget J. The early growth of logic in the child 1964 Routledge London
19. Lerman S. Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: a challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 27 2 1996 133-150
20. Newman D. Griffin P. Cole M. The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school 1989 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
21. Piaget, J. (1962/2000). Commentary on Vygotsky's criticisms of Language and thought of the child, and Judgement and reasoning in the child. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 241-259.
22. Piaget J. Sociological studies 1995 Routledge London
23. Shayer M. Piaget: only the Galileo of cognitive development? Comment on Niaz and Lawson on Genetic Epistemology Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 7 1993 815-818
24. Shayer M. Cognitive acceleration through science education II: its effects and scope International Journal of Science Education 21 8 1999 883-902
25. Shayer, M. (2000). GCSE 1999: added-value from schools adopting the CASE intervention. Report available from Centre of the Advancement of Thinking, King's College, Waterloo Road, London SE1 9NN.
26. Shayer M. Adey P.S. Towards a Science of Science Teaching 1981 Heinemann Educational Books London
27. Shayer M. Beasley F. Does instrumental enrichment work? British Educational Research Journal 13 2 1987 101-119
28. Shayer, M., & Adey, P. S. (Eds.) (2002). Learning Intelligence: cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 years. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
29. Shayer M. Gamble R. Bridging from CASE to core science, ISBN 0 86357 3320 2001 Association for Science Education Hatfield
30. Shayer M. Küchemann D.E. Wylam H. The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 1976 164-173
31. Shayer M. Wylam H. The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children II: 14-16 year-olds and sex differentials British Journal of Educational Psychology 48 1978 62-70
32. Shayer M. Demetriou A. Pervez M. The structure and scaling of concrete operational thought: three studies in four countries Genetic, Social and Psychological Monographs 114 3 1988 309-375
33. Smith L. Jean Piaget In J.A. Palmer (Ed.) 50 Modern thinkers on education: from Piaget to the present 2001 Routledge London
34. Smith L. The social construction of rational understanding In Tryphon A. Vonéche J. (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: the social genesis of thought 1996 Psychology Press Hove
35. van der Veer R. Valsiner J. The Vygotsky reader 1994 Blackwell Oxford
36. van der Veer R. Valsiner J. Understanding Vygotsky: a quest for synthesis 1991 Blackwell Oxford
37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986) (Ed. A. Kozulin) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society 1978 Harvard University Press London
39. West, L. H., & Pines, A. L. (Eds.). (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
40. Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.) (1979). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.