Complex assembly variant design in agile manufacturing. Part II: Assembly variant design methodology

IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers)

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 17-33

  Wang, Aihu ^a   Koc, Bahattin ^b   Nagi, Rakesh ^b  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b the State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

ASSEMBLY MATING GRAPHS; ASSEMBLY VARIANT DESIGN METHODOLOGY; MIXED INTEGER QUADRATIC PROGRAM; OPTIMIZATION MODEL;

AGILE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS;

EID: 11844258799     PISSN: 0740817X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07408170590516773     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahuja, R.K., Magnanti, T.L. and Orlin, J.B. (1990) Network Flows. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2. Akin, O. (1986) Psychology of Architectural Design, Pion, London, UK.
3. Allen, D. and Smith, P. (1980) Part classification and coding. Monograph no. 3, Brigham Young University, CAM Software Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT.
4. Allen, D.K. (1994) Group technology. The Journal of Applied Manufacturing Systems, 6(2), 37-46.
5. Anderl, R. and Mendgen, R. (1995) Parametric design and its impact on solid modeling applications, in Proceedings of the ACM Solid Modeling 1995, ACM Press, New York, pp. 1-12.
6. Anon (1986) OIR and Multi-M: Code Book and Conventions, Organization for Industrial Research, Waltham, MA.
7. Anon (1996) STEP AP224: mechanical product definition for process planning using form features. Document ISO TC184/WG3 N264 (T7). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Canthersburg, MD.
8. Anon (2003) ILOG CPLEX 9.0. User's Manual, available at www.ilog.com. Last accessed October 2004.
9. Chen, X. and Hoffman, C.M. (1995) Design of feature-based and constraint-based CAD, in Proceedings of ACM Solid Modeling 1995 ACM Press, New York, pp. 13-19.
10. D'Souza, B.S. and Simpson, T.W. (2002) A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization, in Proceedings of DETC02, available on CD DETC2002/DAC34106, ASME New York.
11. Finger, S. and Dixon, J.R. (1989) A review of research in mechanical engneering design. Part 1: descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design process. Research in Engineering Design, 1, 51-67.
12. Fowler, J.E. (1996) Variant design for mechanical artifacts: a state-of-the-art survey. Engineering with Computers, 12, 1-15.
13. Francis, R.L., McGinnis, L.E and White, J.A. (1992) Facilities Layout and Location, 2nd edn., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N. and Preiss, K. (1995)Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
15. Hernandez, G., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, E (2002) Design of hierarchic platforms for customizable products, in Proceedings of DETC02, DETC2002/DAC34095, ASME, New York.
16. Hyer, N.L. and Wemmerlov, U. (1985) Group technology oriented coding systems: structures, applications, and implementation. Production and Inventory Management, 26, 55-78.
17. Iyer, S. and Nagi, R. (1997) Automated retrieval and ranking of similar parts in agile manufacturing. IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, 29(10), 859-876.
18. Kinsey, A. (1992) Automated generation of group technology codes from a PDES product information model. M.S. thesis, Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
19. Krishnan, V. Eppinger, S.D. and Whimey, D.E. (1997) Simplifying iterations in cross-functional design decision making. Journal of Mechanical Design, 119(4), 485-494.
20. Messac, A., Martinez, M. and Simpson, T. (2002) Introduction of a product family penalty using physical programming. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 124, 164-172.
21. Minis, I., Candadai, A., Herrmann, J., Lam, G., Lin, E., Nagi, R. and Ramachandran, V. (1995 ) Optimal selection of partners in agile manufacturing. Technical report, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
22. Mullins, S.H. and Anderson, D.C. (1998) Automatic identification of geometric constraints in mechanical assemblies. Computer Aided Design 30(9), 715-726.
23. Nayak, R.U., Chen, W. and Simpson, T. (2002) A variation-based method for product family design. Engineering Optimization, 34(1), 65-81.
24. Opitz, A. (1970) A Classification System to Describe Workpieces, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
25. Ostwald, P.F. (1992) Engineering Cost Estimating, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
26. Prebil, I., Zupan, S. and Lučič, P (1995) Adaptive and variant design of rotational connections. Engineermg with Computers, 11 83-93.
27. Shimomura, Y., Yoshioka, M., Takcda, H., Umeda, Y. and Tomiyama, T. (1998) Representation of design object based on the functional evolution process model. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 120, 221-229.
28. Stutz, J. and Kashyap, R.L. (1989) Improving variant design of mechanical systems through functional relationships, Proceedings of the ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exposition, 1, ASME, New York, pp. 151-159.
29. Suh, N.P. (1990) The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
30. Wang, A. (2001) Variant design ofcomplex assemblies in agile manufacturing. Ph.D. thesis, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
31. Wang, A., Koc, B. and Nagi, R. (2005) Complex assembly variant design in agile manufacturing. Part I: system architecture and assembly modeling methodology. IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, 37 1), 1-15.
32. Watson, I. and Perera, S. (1997) Case-based design: a review and analysis of building design applications. AIEDAM, 11, 59-87.
33. Whitney, D.E. (1995) From geometric modeling to product data models: collaboration between engineering, computer science, and industry at Leeds University. Available at, http://web.mit.edu/ctpid/www/Whitney/ Europe/LEEDS.pdf. Last accessed October 2004.